On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 11:34:59 -0700, RichA
wrote:

No one would argue that Canon dominates the professional photo
market. In nearly every field. Neither would anyone argue that their
cameras aren't at the top of the photo heap when it comes to quality.
But did Canon earn the market via better products, or did they (as
many have suggested) simply buy it?

[Idiotic comparisons to the waste management market, organized crime
and unfair business practices snipped]

But was what Canon did fair business practice,
if in fact that is what they've done?

Rich, stick to your normal menu of rants - sensor dust, plastic, kit
lenses, wide-angle lenses, out-gassing, etc.


TR