You can simply apply the word "mediocre" to all of them, and there'll be
not
much need to do multiple reviews.

I have used disposables, there are times when having a 'valueless' camera is
a major plus, sure the image quality with all of them is weak, but that
doesn't mean they have no uses or cannot produce interesting photographs, I
have submitted a few images to the Shoot-in that were made using Kodak
disposables.

"Jeremy" wrote in message
newsHJag.13834$Nw6.2548@trnddc03...

"Greg Hansen" wrote in message
...
Is there a good source that discusses disposable cameras? Like shutter
speed and aperture, repeatability of shutter speed, lens quality, any
color filtering (underwater cameras?), and whatever else there might be
to
say about them?


You can simply apply the word "mediocre" to all of them, and there'll be
not
much need to do multiple reviews.

Honestly, who would bother studying reviews of low-end stuff like that?