DanP wrote in news:634a73ef-bd29-4f79-837c-
:

On Aug 24, 8:10*pm, Ken Walls wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:23:12 -0400, Bowser wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:24:15 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote:

Wow! *Good luck with the lenses, Canon.

http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10...20mpsensor.asp

Well, the picture would be just as sharp, but not at the pixel level.
Dynamic range, at lower ISOs, could be killer.

How do you figure that? Each photosite is only 2.1 µm in size.

There you go then, you have answered your own question.
Pixel race gone mad.

DanP


Still, I am curious to see what they can wring out of such a pixel count.
Just for the novelty factor. This thing could be the ultimate lens test
bed, FINALLY! Of course, you can always stitch and image and get the same
effect, with good DR.