On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 21:01:03 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-07-18 03:48:56 +0000, Bill W said:

On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 19:40:55 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-07-18 02:24:22 +0000, Bill W said:

On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 21:52:24 -0400, PeterN
wrote:

On 7/17/2016 2:06 PM, Savageduck wrote:
It's just a Scrub Jay, but he is local and has an appetite for the suet
feeder.
https://db.tt/vrmKaAeQ
https://db.tt/ZEVsGOKb


Nice portrait. he first seems a bit too contrasty.

We're in agreement on that to a point, but I think it might have been
enough to just bring the eye area up a bit in both photos. But I'm
once again looking on the wrong monitor for this sort of thing. All 3
of us might be seeing something different.

If you guys want to play here are the two RAF files:
https://db.tt/OZKjfFXT
https://db.tt/lUdPYX4E

Just curious - why are the file sizes about double what I'd expect for
that camera?

Why are you surprised? What sort of RAW file size did you expect for the X-E2?
Remember file size will vary according content.

All of my raw files with all of my cameras tend to be about the same
as the sensor size. I don't expect exact, but yours are double.