View Single Post
  #10  
Old March 16th 14, 08:59 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
me[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default D300 took years to fall to 1/2 price. D7000 took months.

On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 12:05:19 -0400, me wrote:

On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 09:21:31 -0500, nospam
wrote:

In article , me
wrote:

Do you KNOW how many Nikon users are enraged that a D400 was never
produced??

it was called the d7000/7100.

Having just picked up a 7100 this week, as my D200/D300 each exhibit
various fallings, I would say it is immediately apparent upon picking
it up that it not in the class a 400 would be.


what features would you put in a d400 that the d7100 lacks?



Bigger buffer, real weather sealing, better release mechanism on the
door to flash memory, controls layout similar to D200/300. It reminds
me of the my old D70. The release mode dial and lock button are quite
difficult to operate even with very thin Head digital activity gloves
on. Forget about operating it with any real gloves on. Doesn't even
have a way to use a snap on monitor protector. Heck, the D70 even had
one of those.

This is just after one morning's shooting.



What nospam, no come back?