On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:40:41 -0800 (PST), RichA
wrote:



ray wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:28:28 +0000, agvx wrote:

PC World Top 100: http://tr.im/PCWorld100

Amazon.com customer reviews: http://tr.im/D300sReviews

Considering the astuteness of the average consumer, there must be many
better and less expensive alternatives.

Uh, no there aren't. Despite its age (Yes, the s is s warmed over
300) the camera is still the height of its class. There is nothing
cheaper that can match it in all categories. Canon's 7D produces good
images, but no one trusts their bodies.

I guess that's why inexpensive P&S cameras easily beat the image quality
from the Canon 7D DSLR

http://darwinwiggett.wordpress.com/2.../the-canon-7d/

Judging by your discernment over what is and is not a good camera, your
opinion on the D300 is now also just as suspect.

You're not much of an authority on the subject of cameras and photography,
are you now. Perhaps you shouldn't post again until you get some real-life
experience with either topic.