On 2012-03-23 21:44 , Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:16:08 -0500, David
wrote:

Eric writes:

On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:02:04 -0500, David
wrote:

For nearly all photos (not for SI specifically, but preparing my photos
for web display in general) I try for the point where extra size doesn't
bring extra goodness.

I understand that. Unfortunately I seem to prefer larger photographs,
often with lots of detail, and trying to preserve the visual impact in
an image of small size becomes very difficult. I may have to force my
brain to appreciate a different syle of image.

Yes, if you're doing stuff that really needs to be a few feet across,
often it doesn't look it's best at 1200 pixels, I do agree .

I guess that's why I bought a 19" printer. :-)

Me too. But it has nothing to do with preparing an image for the SI.


--
"I was gratified to be able to answer promptly, and I did.
I said I didn't know."
-Samuel Clemens.