![Old](images/statusicon/post_old.gif)
August 20th 04, 04:22 PM
|
|
ColynG writes:
On 20 Aug 2004 12:53:30 GMT, (James E Kropp) wrote:
Is it me, or has the rec.photo newsgroup gone to the toilet and flushed
itself! There used to be a time where this place, (and I mean all of the
newsgroups in rec.photo,) had informative, PHOTOGRAPHIC information.
I used to spend a lot of time browsing and learning, and yes, even
sometimes
contributing, to these newsgroups. Now it seems, all is lost because of all
this rambling and dribble and porn crap!
Cant people just stick to the subject? Any thoughts on how to do this???
James
Kropp
Once you killfile the troll(s) and cross-posters, you will find there
is still plenty of good on-topic posts.
Yes. and it sure cuts down the list. My NG list ran 432 posts for rec.photo.dig
this time. I actually have about 34 posts. The rest is trash.
Charlie Self
"Bore, n.: A person who talks when you wish him to listen." Ambrose Bierce, The
Devil's Dictionary
|