In article 2017042117424828144-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:
http://www.hendriximages.com/blog/20...-go-acros-the-
de
finitive-review
The article contains the statement that:
"The fact that no external RAW converter can achieve a similar
analogue film-like look ... ".
I must agree with what nospam will probably say. If it can be done in
the camera it clearly can be done in an external computer. The fact
that the author of that article doesn't know how is irrelevant.
as i said elsewhere, it's his own limitation, not that of digital.
He isn't shooting film. He is shooting digital and leaving the
processing to the camera.
http://tavphotography.com/acros-vs-acros-film-vs-digital/
it's still his own limitation.
just because *he* can't do it doesn't mean it's not possible.
all he needs to do is match what's done in the camera and the results
will be identical.