Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote:
Brad Sanborne wrote:


Now why on earth did you do all that math over when the same calculations
were already done in the last paragraph?

Because your's were wrong.
29x != 27x (actually 26.8111...x) and 36x != 35x (actually 34.952x).


So does this in anyway change his point? In fact IMHO you make it for
him! :-)

Stephanie