On Dec 16, 2018, newshound wrote
(in articlesoydnYsoKMO0JYvBnZ2dnUU78QXNnZ2d@brightvie w.co.uk):

On 16/12/2018 14:28, Savageduck wrote:
On Dec 16, 2018, newshound wrote
(in articleFamdnaQURdVU3ovBnZ2dnUU78eWdnZ2d@brightvie w.co.uk):

On 16/12/2018 00:11, Savageduck wrote:

Nikkor, especially FF Nikkor glass. Though I have to admit some of the
latest
top end Fuji glass is not exactly inexpensive.

We'll all have to stop raving about how good it is!

(Currently a bit scared of my new X-T3)

-)

Aah! You pulled the trigger on the X-T3. The performance improvement over
the
X-T2 is quite amazing. Enjoy.

BTW; I had to treat mine to some new glass so I bought a used XF16-55mm
f/2.8, so with my other Fuji glass I have a set up which is every bit a
match
for the FF cameras from Nikon, Canon, and Sony at a massive discount.
I shall get the 100-400 in the spring. I was a bit disappointed that
using the cheap XC 50-230 at full stretch the autofocus wasn't quite
getting it right. This wasn't high speed stuff at all. But obviously I
do need to practice and explore all the (many) options more carefully. I
am also looking forward to trying the video with the advantage of an
external mike socket. I currently use a Tascam recorder for main audio
with a static Canon video camera, and the Fuji XE-1 to do "infill"
clips, all manually synchronised. (This is recording live music, but
with a bluetooth feed off the desk to the Tascam).

I'm certainly tempted by the 16-55 too.

I bought the 100-400mm back when the sales season started in September, and
it does a great job.

This was with the X-T2 before the X-T3 was delivered.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/dh8q323iuyle153/DSCF6922-E2.jpg

Back when I first bought my X-E2 I had considered the XC50-230mm, but bought
the 55-200mm with a $200 discount some 2 years ago, and I am very pleased
with what that has delivered.

Also an X-T2 shot.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xwwov7yanz74rem/DSF6645R1E3.jpg

--
Regards,
Savageduck