[Alan Browne:]
The "debate" was a long time ago and it
is over.

Of course. The recent debate was just about the foolishness of the outcome
of the previous "debate" you are referring to.

"zlr", for lack of a better name was agreed
to and the definition of what it covered was agreed to.

A recent debate established very clearly the foolishness of naming EVFs
"ZLRs". But this debate was already some time ago and it is over - please
don't insist on it unless you have fresh reasons to offer, which is
obviously not the case.

Is it perfect? No. Does it have its place?
Absolutely. Are there other places for P&S, DSLR
and rangefinders? Yes. Is there a place for
general discussions about digital? Yep.

You are mixing up two competely different issues, to wit the
inappropriateness of naming EVFs "ZLRs" and the usefulness of a group
about EVFs.

Julio.