Alan Browne wrote:
W.Boyce wrote:
Alan Browne wrote:
W.Boyce wrote:

What sort of ratio do you think he should aim for? Shooting
digital.

1:34.234123541362354 Precisely.

The assignment was completed and he "winged it" in the absence of any
meaningful input from me or this group. He shot considerably fewer
pictures than shown above. Maybe he was lucky or a better
photographer than Browne.

You really are intellectually impaired if you can't recognize a jibe at
the notion that there is a useful ratio "to be aimed for".

Well, I was suspicious.
12 decimal places I could have accepted, but when the number ran to 15
places, I started to smell a rat...

--
Jeff R.
(What's that? Izzat you, Doug? ..sniff, sniff...)