View Single Post
  #6  
Old October 8th 06, 09:35 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
John McWilliams
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,945
Default Canon screwed themselves (or did they?)

JC Dill wrote:
On 8 Oct 2006 11:15:05 -0700, "RichA" wrote:

The consensus seems to be a jump from the 350 to the 400 isn't worth it
from an image improvement perspective,


This is true for almost any single product jump.

Most people don't jump to a newer model (of anything) until there are
2 (or more) model upgrades. E.g. most camera owners didn't jump from
10d to 20d, but some did jump from 10d to 30d. Most didn't jump from
300d to 350d, but some did jump from 300d to 400d. Most didn't jump
from G1 to G2, but some did jump from G1 to G3. Etc. (I don't know
the Nikon product line well enough to give similar examples but I'm
sure they exist there as well.) I own a Canon 1DMII, I'm not jumping
to a 1DMIIN. That doesn't mean the N isn't a good camera - it is
selling like hotcakes but I bet that most buyers are either A)
replacing an older (than the 1DMII) body or B) are first-time buyers
in the DSLR market.


There are still several millions of people who will buy their first
DSLR. Many of them, and some of us existing Canon shooters, are
impressed by pixel counts.

--
John McWilliams