ASAAR wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:13:34 -0700, "MarkČ" (just back and still
griping) mjmorgan(lowest even number wrote:
Oh well, you won't miss us then.
Paul,
I block spammers...but when you respond to them (as you do SOOO frequently
do) we're still stuck seeing their posts through your post. Surely you must
realize that the spammers themselves NEVER actually see your
response...since they anonymously post them to hundreds of groups...so would
you be so kind as to simply ignore them...so that the rest of us can ignore
them as well?
Many of the spammers aren't quite so obvious, and Paul's reply can
be used as an Early Spammer Warning Device. This makes it easier
for me do ignore more spammers than would be the case if he didn't.
Seriously this is my intention, just for the odd person who stumbles
on a post and clicks what sometimes looks like a genuine link. I just
try to make my reply slightly amusing too. Some people take it
seriously though and rather as I would rather label spammers as such
they are more concerned with my actions. they also seem to think I am
so stupid I don't know that most spams are not being minded by a real
person, but it really is just a marker, nothing more and nothing less.
Occasionally a spammer will argue the point, which just adds to the
fun.
--
Paul (We won't die of devotion)
-------------------------------------------------------
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/