Thread
:
Lens Cell Cleaning
View Single Post
#
19
February 15th 11, 01:52 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.large-format
David Nebenzahl
external usenet poster
Posts: 1,353
Lens Cell Cleaning
On 2/14/2011 3:57 PM
spake thus:
On 2/14/2011 2:32 PM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
In ,
wrote:
From my use, it's a very nice lens given a bad rap mainly because
it was sold at a low price as a "novice lens". Who wants that
when you can buy a pro lens? :P
Well, at least in the 1990s when the question arose for me, it was
more like "who wants that when you can buy a nice clean used
Commercial Ektar"?
I actually replaced a "nice clean" commercial ektar of the same length
with this lens and got much better results at my shooting apertures of
f16-f22. Maybe my sample was a bad one but the geronar has much higher
contrast and "snappyness" to the pictures, especially in difficult
lighting. Add to that a much better shutter, I don't think I'd want 50
year old lens with marginal coatings in one of those old supermatic
shutters over this one.
What do you mean, "marginal coatings"? Do you think they flake off or
something?
Sorry, but it sounds to me as if you've bought the marketing hype hook,
line and sinker when it comes to "advanced, space-age" coatings. The
only "marginal" here is that modren coatings are marginally better than
the old ones. Hell, even *uncoated* lenses (horrors!) can perform
extremely well (under certain conditions).
--
The phrase "jump the shark" itself jumped the shark about a decade ago.
- Usenet
David Nebenzahl
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by David Nebenzahl
Find all threads started by David Nebenzahl