"FLY135" fly_135(@ hot not not)notmail.com wrote in message
link.net...

"Wilbert Dijkhof" wrote in message
...

Let's try again...

"Anyone who wasn't terrorist sympathizer wouldn't say it was a police
state"

Since when is a double negative an example of adequate logical argument?
It's not even terrific English. Nor are you developing a logical argument
from a proven premise as "logic" would require.

Since Rata said that the US is a police state, the logic of Moose's post
dictates that he is a terrorist sympathizer. That is of course predicated
on the correctness of Moose's logic.

In this instance, a big predicate.