Thread: 400mm IS
View Single Post
  #6  
Old January 25th 06, 03:28 AM posted to rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 400mm IS

Eric Miller wrote:

I have a Canon EF 400mm f/5.6 L USM. What I would really like to have is
this same lens with IS. At this point, the actual options (without
quintupling the price) are the Canon 100-400 IS, 300 f/4 IS + 1.4 TC and the
Sigma 80-400 IS. Sure, the 400 DO IS and 400 2.8 IS are available, but not
in my price range. So, what is the likelihood that a) Canon will come out
with an 400mm 5.6 IS replacement for my lens; b) a third party will make a
compatible 400mm f/5.6 IS/OS/VR non-zoom; or, c) someone will make an
IS/OS/VR teleconverter in Canon mount?

Second question: Has anyone made an actual comparison of the realistally
expectable photo quality between the 300 f/4 IS + 1.4TC, the 100-400 IS,
80-400 OS and the 400 f/5.6 L that takes into account the results obtainable
with IS? I'm not just talking about optical quality, but general sharpness
of photos in the real world, giving the lenses with IS/OS their due. I'm
starting to suspect that whatever marginal benefits the 400 f/5.6 L offers
in optical quality is outweighed by the benefits of IS/OS for certain
applications, like the small bird photography that I do.

The other option, is, I gues, using a gyroscopic stabilizer like the ones
offered by Kenyon Labs, but those aren't exactly cheap.

Eric Miller
www.dyesscreek.com


I found my 100-400 mm a little soft at 400mm. Another frequent poster
here, Bill Hilton, has one that is very sharp at 400. So if you
decide the 100-400 route, test it first. (I'll sell you mine ;-)
Tests at:
Relative Lens Sharpness
http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedeta...lens-sharpness

Older test:
Canon EOS 100-400mm L IS vs Sigma 170-500mm vs Canon 75-300mm IS
http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/lenstest1.html

I have opted for a 300 mm f/4 L IS. It is lighter and faster
autofocus, and provides as much sharpness at 300 as the 100-400
at 400mm. Then at 420 mm (300+1.4x TC) I get more detail
than with the 100-400 at 400. I also use it on a 1D Mark II so
I have autofocus at 600 mm f/8.

Sample (300+1.4x TC):
http://www.clarkvision.com/galleries...962.b-700.html

Roger