Tom Phillips wrote:
Scott W wrote:

I note that they did not say that 400 ISO print film was equivalent to
a digital image of 24MP but put it closer to 6 MP.

You note wrong as usual, plus reinterpret
according to your ignorant bias.) Also
never had the courage or knowledge to
respond to my orignal post, I notice...
Tom you are just not worth the bother. You have it fixed in your head
what you believe is true and no amount of evidence to the contrary to
going to sway you. I have had technicians working for me that were
very much like you, in time you learn there is no use trying to educate
them.

Scott