On 2017-05-02 01:00:16 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Mon, 1 May 2017 16:46:36 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2017-05-01 23:23:15 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Mon, 1 May 2017 12:49:08 -0400, PAS wrote:

On 4/28/2017 8:17 AM, Whisky-dave wrote:
On Friday, 28 April 2017 13:05:22 UTC+1, android wrote:
In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote:

On Friday, 28 April 2017 12:10:54 UTC+1, android wrote:
In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote:

On Thursday, 27 April 2017 13:12:04 UTC+1, android wrote:
In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote:

On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 17:42:34 UTC+1, android wrote:
Whisky-dave Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 14:50:23 UTC+1, android wrote:

Well that was the original Cibachrome later they came out with
version
2 which didn;t need nuetralising.

You seem to have smelled it goood! Thou shall not inhale...
Well the bible didn't say not to inhale.

So? I did! It's common sense really...
Only if you have a choice.
You didn't? Oki...
no it wasn't an oki printer.
I just hate it when they take good words and make brands out of them...
--
teleportation kills
I didn;t and still don't know is Oki is a word or not .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oki
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/spel...english/?q=oki

any other suggestions ?

There are perfectly good words outside of dictionaries 'n stuff...
Yes I know but when I try to use then I'm told I can't spell.



If I understand the Androids use of "Oki" properly, that would be
spelled "Okee" in the USA, as in "Okee Dokey"

In England it would be "Okeigh Dokeigh".

Don't you mean; "Oakeigh Doakeigh"?

I guess almost any local version is understood.
Okay, OK, or should that be okey-dokey?

Yup.

....and then there is this:
http://mentalfloss.com/article/50042/whats-real-origin-ok
--
Regards,

Savageduck