View Single Post
  #78  
Old May 20th 17, 12:00 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Eric Stevens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,611
Default Monitor settings

On Fri, 19 May 2017 23:21:47 +0100, sid wrote:

nospam wrote:


just because you aren't interested in quality doesn't mean the rest of
the world isn't.

Plain old insults, shows you've got no real argument.


then it's a good thing i didn't insult you or anyone else, isn't it?

if anyone has no real argument, that would be you, something even more
clear now than it was before.


The more you know you've lost the more pointless your posts become.

Peer review will very quickly let you know if your doing
something wrong.

which is what everyone in this newsgroup is telling you.

No, even you agreed that you can't tell a blind bit of difference.

i did not say that.

You said it was not possible to tell which photos had or had not been
processed on a colour calibrated monitor. To anyone with half a brain
that implies that there is no difference. If you meant something else
perhaps you should have said something else.

no it doesn't imply that at all.

So, what does it imply?


that you don't understand colour management, what a colour managed
workflow is and why it's beneficial to everyone (not just you), and
that you aren't interested in learning anything.


So, let me get this straight, *you* can't tell which of my images have or
have not been processed on a colour calibrated monitor means that I don't
understand colour management? It means to me that you cannot see a
difference ergo it makes none.


Oh, it does. The problem is that you are not using an appropriate
test.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens