View Single Post
  #9  
Old November 4th 08, 12:56 PM posted to rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
Roy G[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 208
Default P&S Teleconverters


"TrentBaxter" wrote in message
...
On 4 Nov 2008 04:30:03 -0600, "Toby" wrote:


"bugbear" wrote in message
news
Eric Stevens wrote:
... there is a down side.

In other news there is NO ultimate camera.

Resolution, sharpness, convenience, ease of use,
weight, cost, speed of response all vary,
and in some cases conflict.


And that is the basic truth of the matter. Each type of camera and lens
and
accessory offers some advantages and some disadvantages. Wise users
research
the pros and cons of each, and then make an informed choice according to
their needs and desires.

Toby


Those even more wise, borne of lifetime of true real-world photography
experience,
SNIPPED

all the other virtual-photographer DSLR-trolls) even more glaringly
obvious to
the world.



I do not make claims for any particular type of equipment, and happen to
agree with Toby.

You make claims for only one type of equipment, and seem to state that P & S
cameras are the ultimate in every respect.

Worse, you very clearly insult the intelligence of anyone who does not agree
with you.

You never seem to post on any other topic, except to extoll the virtues of P
& S or damn the shortcomings of SLRs.

You keep changing your alias, and have replied to your own postings using
another alias.

AND you seem unwilling or unable to specify which make or models you use.

It is long past the time for you to come clean, and start giving some real
information, instead of just spouting far fetched theory and poisonous bile.

Put up or shut up.

Roy G