In article , Eric Stevens wrote:

Eric Stevens:
I'm not so foolish or so inexperienced as to pretend that it
absolutely wouldn't stand a chance in a court of law.

Sandman:
Yet here you are, arguing a definition that only has relevancy in
a legal context.

Me? I'm not arguing a definition.

Incorrect:

"Nowhere that I can see does the license prevent anyone from
running Windows. The terms of the license apply only if one
chooses to run Apple software. If he chooses to run Apple
software (Hackintosh) he *will* be running it on an
"Apple-branded computer"."
/ Eric Stevens- 02/19/2016

--
Sandman