Draco wrote:
(snip)
You really do deserver the title "CYBER SLUT", don't you?


(sigh) Someone is off their meds again. Always happens this time of
year. I guess you deserve the title "CYBER BULLY". Such a shame that a
once promising photographer drank to much carrot juice to improve his
sight and lost sight of the art of photography.

Get help.

Draco

There you go Draco...
I've got 2 choices. Both are likely to happen.

One is to fight the jackass with his own behavior.
The other is to engage in protracted and expensive legal action to halt
his criminal activities and copyright infringement...

Not to mention his false and totally wrongful 3 year campaign in harmony
with the Aussie-on-th-run to discredit my digital enlargement
algorithm... Without ever having seen one of my enlargements himself...
Having some qualification to make the outrageous statements he does
might also have given him some credibility too... He has none.

I'll tell you this Draco...
No legitimate and reputable business person like me should have to put
up with this idiot's behavior. It's not as if he's ever done business
with me.

He's just a jackass loser from a backwoods area of America who thinks
because he's got an internet connection he can defame, insult and attack
people whenever he feels his secure little 'group' of worshipers is
under threat.

Here's a few facts for you Draco...

Before ever National Geographic will look at submissions from anyone,
they have to have credibility.

Before ever National Geographic will consider anyone's photos for
publication, they have to have a story with them or be commissioned shots.

Your idolization of a happy snapping hillbilly with an over size ego and
under achieving ability only goes to show how easy it is to fool you.

Already he's filled you with bull**** that evidence I recently posted
http://www.annika1980.com/evidence/moats-comments.htm contradicts and
somehow managed to fool you into thinking a postage stamp size photo (at
publication resolution) is something other than what it is... A
Photoshop creation with no commercial value.

It's one thing to post positive comments about mundane photos. You've
done that with mine often enough but to convince yourself they are
something other than Internet pictures only makes you look like a puppet
of Bret's... You know, like the ones he creates to tell himself his
****ty pictures are better than they are...

It's curious to watch how your behavior becomes a mirror of the jackass
when I blocked you location from access to my sites... Really curious.