"Annika1980" wrote in message
...
From: "Mark M"

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/34504445

Why are you shooting at 4f?
Isn't this shot with your 70-200 2.8 L?

1/250 could have been a crispy 1/350 or more at 2.8,
and yes...you'd still have some obvious and nice motion effects...

Can you say "flash sync?"


ooh. The flash... no wonder the blur in the background is so funny -
unflattering.