Canon 200mm f1.8 - why did they stop making it
|
Canon 200mm f1.8 - why did they stop making it
rugbyphoto wrote:
Seems to be the perfect field side sports lens, why did they stop? Probably because they weren't selling well. Why ask here when a quick phone call to Canon will answer the question? |
Canon 200mm f1.8 - why did they stop making it
John A. Stovall wrote:
Canon wanted to be Green and not use leaded glass in their lenses. An incomplete theory sullied by unrelenting reality: had the demand for the optic existed, Canon could have simply redesigned it. |
Canon 200mm f1.8 - why did they stop making it
Lead-based flint glasses have all been replaced by titanium-based
glasses with identical optical properties. Even if a re-design were necessary for the 200/1.8 it would be an almost trivial undertaking. Brian |
Canon 200mm f1.8 - why did they stop making it
wrote in message
ups.com... John A. Stovall wrote: Canon wanted to be Green and not use leaded glass in their lenses. An incomplete theory sullied by unrelenting reality: had the demand for the optic existed, Canon could have simply redesigned it. If you don't think there's a demand for that lens, check the prices on ebay! Sheesh! -- Skip Middleton http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com |
Canon 200mm f1.8 - why did they stop making it
Because no one I could speak to at Canon Canada appears to even recall
that they had such a lens :) |
Canon 200mm f1.8 - why did they stop making it
The ebay prices seem to be pretty much what you would have bought one
for so the demand remains high. I dream of finding the cash for one of those beauties. garry www.rugbyphoto.com |
Canon 200mm f1.8 - why did they stop making it
"rugbyphoto" wrote in message
oups.com... The ebay prices seem to be pretty much what you would have bought one for so the demand remains high. I dream of finding the cash for one of those beauties. garry www.rugbyphoto.com Yah, me too. Then, having found the cash, I'd have to find the justification. Just having the fastest 200mm lens ever made seems sort of weak, in light of the $4000 hole it would put in our back account. -- Skip Middleton http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PhotoBanter.com