Ripe Apples
 

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:


I didn't need to do that, doesn't you're monitor take up space too.
You see one of the advantages of an all in one design is that yuo don;t need
that box yuo call a destop, we even went for that design in our PC lab when
we brought about 30 dell 9030.

First of all I can't buy an all in one with the same spec as what I
have got.

in about a month, you will be able to buy an all-in-one that blows away
whatever you have.

Second you can't replace the screen with another of
different spec while retaining your existing hardware.

so what? the screen doesn't normally fail and the retina display is
*much* better than what you have.

Ripe Apples
 

On 11/13/2017 7:27 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:


I didn't need to do that, doesn't you're monitor take up space too.
You see one of the advantages of an all in one design is that yuo don;t need
that box yuo call a destop, we even went for that design in our PC lab when
we brought about 30 dell 9030.

First of all I can't buy an all in one with the same spec as what I
have got.

in about a month, you will be able to buy an all-in-one that blows away
whatever you have.

Second you can't replace the screen with another of
different spec while retaining your existing hardware.

so what? the screen doesn't normally fail and the retina display is
*much* better than what you have.


Do you really need a screen of that density, when your images are going
to be seen on screens with much lower density?

--
PeterN

Ripe Apples
 

In article , PeterN
wrote:

Second you can't replace the screen with another of
different spec while retaining your existing hardware.

so what? the screen doesn't normally fail and the retina display is
*much* better than what you have.

Do you really need a screen of that density, when your images are going
to be seen on screens with much lower density?

yes.

Ripe Apples
 

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 19:27:23 -0500, nospam
wrote:

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:


I didn't need to do that, doesn't you're monitor take up space too.
You see one of the advantages of an all in one design is that yuo don;t need
that box yuo call a destop, we even went for that design in our PC lab when
we brought about 30 dell 9030.

First of all I can't buy an all in one with the same spec as what I
have got.

in about a month, you will be able to buy an all-in-one that blows away
whatever you have.

That's always the case.

Second you can't replace the screen with another of
different spec while retaining your existing hardware.

so what? the screen doesn't normally fail and the retina display is
*much* better than what you have.

Is it a matte display or only semi-gloss?
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

Ripe Apples
 

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

I didn't need to do that, doesn't you're monitor take up space too.
You see one of the advantages of an all in one design is that yuo don;t
need
that box yuo call a destop, we even went for that design in our PC lab
when
we brought about 30 dell 9030.

First of all I can't buy an all in one with the same spec as what I
have got.

in about a month, you will be able to buy an all-in-one that blows away
whatever you have.

That's always the case.

no it isn't.

the imac pro comes out next month and will raise the bar. again.

Second you can't replace the screen with another of
different spec while retaining your existing hardware.

so what? the screen doesn't normally fail and the retina display is
*much* better than what you have.

Is it a matte display or only semi-gloss?

it's a 10 bpc retina wide gamut display that is considered to be the
best in the biz by pretty much everyone. it really is *that* good.

you won't notice any glossiness or lack thereof unless it's off, which
is not how a display of any sort is intended to be used.

Ripe Apples
 

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 22:52:06 -0500, nospam
wrote:

Is it a matte display or only semi-gloss?

it's a 10 bpc retina wide gamut display that is considered to be the
best in the biz by pretty much everyone. it really is *that* good.

you won't notice any glossiness or lack thereof unless it's off, which
is not how a display of any sort is intended to be used.

I suppose that in the future you will claim to have answered my
question.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

Ripe Apples
 

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

Is it a matte display or only semi-gloss?

it's a 10 bpc retina wide gamut display that is considered to be the
best in the biz by pretty much everyone. it really is *that* good.

you won't notice any glossiness or lack thereof unless it's off, which
is not how a display of any sort is intended to be used.

I suppose that in the future you will claim to have answered my
question.

or the present.

it's stupid to get a superb high resolution display and then blur it
with a matte coating. you *won't* notice the finish of the display
while using it. you're looking for excuses.

Ripe Apples
 

On 11/13/2017 9:50 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN
wrote:

Second you can't replace the screen with another of
different spec while retaining your existing hardware.

so what? the screen doesn't normally fail and the retina display is
*much* better than what you have.

Do you really need a screen of that density, when your images are going
to be seen on screens with much lower density?

yes.


Why. What is the benefit, except for the user liking it.

--
PeterN

Ripe Apples
 

In article , PeterN
wrote:

Second you can't replace the screen with another of
different spec while retaining your existing hardware.

so what? the screen doesn't normally fail and the retina display is
*much* better than what you have.

Do you really need a screen of that density, when your images are going
to be seen on screens with much lower density?

yes.

Why. What is the benefit, except for the user liking it.

image quality.

what is the benefit of your 36mp camera, versus a more affordable 24 mp?

Ripe Apples
 

On 11/14/2017 6:56 AM, nospam wrote:
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

Is it a matte display or only semi-gloss?

it's a 10 bpc retina wide gamut display that is considered to be the
best in the biz by pretty much everyone. it really is *that* good.

you won't notice any glossiness or lack thereof unless it's off, which
is not how a display of any sort is intended to be used.

I suppose that in the future you will claim to have answered my
question.

or the present.

it's stupid to get a superb high resolution display and then blur it
with a matte coating. you *won't* notice the finish of the display
while using it. you're looking for excuses.

And when using a gloss monitor, although the highlights and mid range
colors are great, it is very difficult to see gradations of color in the
shadow to dark areas. Most people may not care, but I do. I know the
gloss on Apple branded monitors is not as high as it used to be, but I
prefer to work on a matte surfaced monitor.
Similarly, if I am submitting a print for a print competition, because
of the configuration of the light boxes they are usually viewed under, I
will print on a glossy surface, and underexpose by about a half stop.
OTOH if the print is going to be hanging on a wall, I will usually use a
matte paper. IOW I print for the conditions under which the image will
be viewed.

--
PeterN