PhotoBanter.com

PhotoBanter.com (http://www.photobanter.com/index.php)
-   General Photography Techniques (http://www.photobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Share beauties of Canadian Rockies (http://www.photobanter.com/showthread.php?t=3954)

Shu October 20th 03 04:41 AM

Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
 
Sept 2- - Oct 4, 2003, I hiked in Canadian Rockies for two weeks.
Now the photo web for my hiking trip is up on-line.
You are cordially invited to visit the new photo gallery. Hope you will
enjoy the beauties of Canadian Rockies.

http://128.111.124.127/ssr/CanadaRockies.htm

Ronald




PWW October 20th 03 02:52 PM

Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
 
You have some nice images in there. I might make them smaller, and easier to
see.

I would also recommend putting a some sort of visible watermark on your
images otherwise they might end up in someone elsešs portfolio.

--
PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson)
Over 1,000 Photographs Online at,
http://PhotoStockFile.com


On 10/19/03 11:41 PM, in article , "Shu"
wrote:

Sept 2- - Oct 4, 2003, I hiked in Canadian Rockies for two weeks.
Now the photo web for my hiking trip is up on-line.
You are cordially invited to visit the new photo gallery. Hope you will
enjoy the beauties of Canadian Rockies.

http://128.111.124.127/ssr/CanadaRockies.htm

Ronald





Alan Browne October 20th 03 04:55 PM

Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
 


Shu wrote:

Sept 2- - Oct 4, 2003, I hiked in Canadian Rockies for two weeks.
Now the photo web for my hiking trip is up on-line.
You are cordially invited to visit the new photo gallery. Hope you will
enjoy the beauties of Canadian Rockies.

http://128.111.124.127/ssr/CanadaRockies.htm

Ronald



Congrats.

Maybe name your "kayaking" shots to "canoe" shots... (97-07)



ralford October 20th 03 06:45 PM

Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
 
Question - is there any "value" to reduced sized web photos? Certainly a
print couldn't be made of any commercial value, IMHO.

Also, with respect, I find your (PWW) copyright across the heart of the
picture very distracting.

Cheers,

rma

"PWW" wrote in message
...
You have some nice images in there. I might make them smaller, and easier

to
see.

I would also recommend putting a some sort of visible watermark on your
images otherwise they might end up in someone elsešs portfolio.

--
PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson)
Over 1,000 Photographs Online at,
http://PhotoStockFile.com


On 10/19/03 11:41 PM, in article , "Shu"
wrote:

Sept 2- - Oct 4, 2003, I hiked in Canadian Rockies for two weeks.
Now the photo web for my hiking trip is up on-line.
You are cordially invited to visit the new photo gallery. Hope you will
enjoy the beauties of Canadian Rockies.

http://128.111.124.127/ssr/CanadaRockies.htm

Ronald







Carole October 20th 03 07:51 PM

Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
 
Just wondering....I just added a photo section to my website. I put a
"no right click" javascript on all the photo pages with a friendly kind
of message that says it you would like a copy to contact me :) Is that
enough to stop people from stealing my photos? I know about Digimarc,
but I'm not working at present, so $$ are rather tight.

What does everyone else do to protect their work, but also get it out
there for people to see?



ralford wrote:
Question - is there any "value" to reduced sized web photos? Certainly a
print couldn't be made of any commercial value, IMHO.

Also, with respect, I find your (PWW) copyright across the heart of the
picture very distracting.

Cheers,

rma

"PWW" wrote in message
...

You have some nice images in there. I might make them smaller, and easier


to

see.

I would also recommend putting a some sort of visible watermark on your
images otherwise they might end up in someone elsešs portfolio.

--
PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson)
Over 1,000 Photographs Online at,
http://PhotoStockFile.com


On 10/19/03 11:41 PM, in article , "Shu"
wrote:


Sept 2- - Oct 4, 2003, I hiked in Canadian Rockies for two weeks.
Now the photo web for my hiking trip is up on-line.
You are cordially invited to visit the new photo gallery. Hope you will
enjoy the beauties of Canadian Rockies.

http://128.111.124.127/ssr/CanadaRockies.htm

Ronald








PWW October 22nd 03 12:54 AM

Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
 
All those special ways to stop copying just doesn't work very well. It seems
that there are ways around all of them. That is why I recommend putting a
visible watermark on each and every image I put on the web. And use a lower
resolution image of not to big of size. I just figure that I have to get my
images out in front of clients and and accept a few thefts from my lower
rez, smaller watermarked images might make them think twice about taking my
images without my permission. I will still go after every single copyright
infringement that I can.
--
PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson)
Over 1,000 Photographs Online at,
http://PhotoStockFile.com



On 10/20/03 2:51 PM, in article ,
"Carole" wrote:

Just wondering....I just added a photo section to my website. I put a
"no right click" javascript on all the photo pages with a friendly kind
of message that says it you would like a copy to contact me :) Is that
enough to stop people from stealing my photos? I know about Digimarc,
but I'm not working at present, so $$ are rather tight.

What does everyone else do to protect their work, but also get it out
there for people to see?





DaveS October 22nd 03 01:10 AM

Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
 

"PWW" wrote:
snip
That is why I recommend putting a
visible watermark on each and every image I put on the web. And use a

lower
snip


I think you have a very nice site, and if someone wants to buy the image,
the watermark is not that distracting.

Have fun,
Dave



PWW October 22nd 03 01:21 AM

Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
 
Did you look at his web-site? He had huge files on his site. I do believe
somebody could have used them for other reasons. Even if somebody wanted to
get a hold of the photographer of a photograph they "took off his site" just
to review and evaluate it, they might have a problem finding where they got
it because he did not have a watermark on the photograph.

Even if the photographs are copied and then only used on web-sites, the
web-site business still should pay the photographer for that use. That makes
it a "commercial value." It would be so easy for web-sites to use many
unmarked photographs and some photographs would allow even printed materials
being made from them.

Yes, I agree my original Watermark is somewhat distracting. I am a little
gun-shy or overprotective myself. I have changed it, but I have not changed
all the photos on my main site yet. Gee whiz, over 900 photos is a lot to
do, AGAIN... I will do it, but I have been rather busy lately.

It would seem that your images would benefit from a watermark also. I took a
look at your photos (pretty nice) an you are selling 4x6 prints, to people
of your horse photos. With an web image size of 8.8x6.6 @ 72PPI, that is
plenty large enough for some people to print nice 4x6, 5x7 and with a little
work larger photographs. IMHO.
--
PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson)
Over 1,000 Photographs Online at,
http://PhotoStockFile.com


On 10/20/03 1:45 PM, in article xbVkb.4513$B_2.781@okepread02, "ralford"
wrote:

Question - is there any "value" to reduced sized web photos? Certainly a
print couldn't be made of any commercial value, IMHO.

Also, with respect, I find your (PWW) copyright across the heart of the
picture very distracting.

Cheers,

rma

"PWW" wrote in message
...
You have some nice images in there. I might make them smaller, and easier

to
see.

I would also recommend putting a some sort of visible watermark on your
images otherwise they might end up in someone elsešs portfolio.

--
PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson)
Over 1,000 Photographs Online at,
http://PhotoStockFile.com


On 10/19/03 11:41 PM, in article , "Shu"
wrote:

Sept 2- - Oct 4, 2003, I hiked in Canadian Rockies for two weeks.
Now the photo web for my hiking trip is up on-line.
You are cordially invited to visit the new photo gallery. Hope you will
enjoy the beauties of Canadian Rockies.

http://128.111.124.127/ssr/CanadaRockies.htm

Ronald








PWW October 22nd 03 01:22 AM

Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
 
Thanks Dave,
--
PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson)
Over 1,000 Photographs Online at,
http://PhotoStockFile.com


On 10/21/03 8:10 PM, in article
. net, "DaveS"
wrote:


"PWW" wrote:
snip
That is why I recommend putting a
visible watermark on each and every image I put on the web. And use a

lower
snip


I think you have a very nice site, and if someone wants to buy the image,
the watermark is not that distracting.

Have fun,
Dave




Carole October 22nd 03 01:46 AM

Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
 
I'll have to look into watermarking. I've never done it, but I'm sure
there has to be some place on the web where you can learn how to do this?


PWW wrote:
All those special ways to stop copying just doesn't work very well. It seems
that there are ways around all of them. That is why I recommend putting a
visible watermark on each and every image I put on the web. And use a lower
resolution image of not to big of size. I just figure that I have to get my
images out in front of clients and and accept a few thefts from my lower
rez, smaller watermarked images might make them think twice about taking my
images without my permission. I will still go after every single copyright
infringement that I can.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PhotoBanter.com