PhotoBanter.com

PhotoBanter.com (http://www.photobanter.com/index.php)
-   Film & Labs (http://www.photobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   HP5+ vs Tri-X when pushing (http://www.photobanter.com/showthread.php?t=67742)

Steven Woody July 22nd 06 01:32 PM

HP5+ vs Tri-X when pushing
 
hi,

i want to know which one is better when pushing? and which one is
faster ( in real ASA )?

p.s. suppoes D-76 devloper will be used.

thanks.

-
woody


July 22nd 06 05:50 PM

HP5+ vs Tri-X when pushing
 
In article . com,
Steven Woody wrote:

i want to know which one is better when pushing? and which one is
faster ( in real ASA )?


The real "ASA" is the one printed on the box. Pushing only increases
the slope of the curve, i.e. it ups the contrast.


Steven Woody July 23rd 06 02:36 AM

HP5+ vs Tri-X when pushing
 

wrote:
In article . com,
Steven Woody wrote:

i want to know which one is better when pushing? and which one is
faster ( in real ASA )?


The real "ASA" is the one printed on the box. Pushing only increases
the slope of the curve, i.e. it ups the contrast.


by real 'asa', i mean the film speed acording to human experience when
use a film in practice.

pushing increases the overall contrast by means of move most lower
value zones to high value zones, hence increases brightness. that's
kinda of human feeling of 'speed'.

please answer the queston directly. thanks.

-
woody


jon fabian July 24th 06 08:20 AM

HP5+ vs Tri-X when pushing
 
In article . com,
"Steven Woody" wrote:

i want to know which one is better when pushing? and which one is
faster ( in real ASA )?

p.s. suppoes D-76 devloper will be used.


The two emulsions are different; neither is "better". HP5 is more
contrasty than TriX out of the box so it will push contrastier. TriX's
grain structure hasn't changed much over the decades so the larger grain
shouldn't seem as intrusive as HP5's. Since HP5 has more of a "T" style
grain, when pushed it resembles (IMHO) high-speed color neg grain.

If you are after contrast HC-110 or equivalent might be a better choice
than D-76. D-76 is pretty neutral and very kind to midtones. But
processing method also plays a role. D-76 in a small tank will yield
different results than dip-n-dunk with nitrogen burst agitation.

Speed, like contrast and grain is relative and subjective. Some people
regularly pull 400 to 200 for a wider latitude. Some people push 400 to
800 or 1600 for available light or monster grain.

Remember the first rule of photography: "Light interacts with silver
salts; all else is negotiable."

Hope this helps,

Jon

July 28th 06 09:50 PM

HP5+ vs Tri-X when pushing
 
In article . com,
Steven Woody wrote:

by real 'asa', i mean the film speed acording to human experience when
use a film in practice.


That would be EI. ASA (now ISO) has a strict definition.

pushing increases the overall contrast by means of move most lower
value zones to high value zones, hence increases brightness.


The lower zones don't change much at all with longer processing (other
than increasing fog base). All you do it increase contrast.

that's kinda of human feeling of 'speed'.


No, it isn't.

please answer the queston directly. thanks.


Please do some tests and answer it for yourself.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PhotoBanter.com