Digital camera review on long term test (and torture test)
Could anyone direct me with website that provide long term test on
digital cameras, not just the test when the camera is brand new? Any difference in performance between the expensive models or established brand name and their cheaper models? Thanks for info |
Digital camera review on long term test (and torture test)
On May 20, 11:26 am, wrote:
Could anyone direct me with website that provide long term test on digital cameras, not just the test when the camera is brand new? Any difference in performance between the expensive models or established brand name and their cheaper models? Thanks for info Pro models actually specify things like shutter life. However, some (Canon) have had problems in other areas. Rule of thumb, if it costs more, it will last longer. |
Digital camera review on long term test (and torture test)
Rich observed
On May 20, 11:26 am, wrote: Could anyone direct me with website that provide long term test on digital cameras, not just the test when the camera is brand new? Any difference in performance between the expensive models or established brand name and their cheaper models? Thanks for info Pro models actually specify things like shutter life. However, some (Canon) have had problems in other areas. Rule of thumb, if it costs more, it will last longer. umm. ... alternatively if it costs more, it'll cost more to repair! Mike -- Michael J Davis I have a photographic memory; but then I forget to load the film |
Digital camera review on long term test (and torture test)
On Sun, 20 May 2007 08:26:02 -0700, aniramca wrote:
Could anyone direct me with website that provide long term test on digital cameras, not just the test when the camera is brand new? Any difference in performance between the expensive models or established brand name and their cheaper models? Thanks for info IMHO - you'll get more info from users than from a 'long term test'. I think the basic thing to remember is that the better care you take of photographic equipment, the longer it will last. That's true of optics as well as electronics. |
Digital camera review on long term test (and torture test)
RockyZ wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 09:47:07 +0100, Michael J Davis wrote: Rich observed On May 20, 11:26 am, wrote: Could anyone direct me with website that provide long term test on digital cameras, not just the test when the camera is brand new? Any difference in performance between the expensive models or established brand name and their cheaper models? Thanks for info Pro models actually specify things like shutter life. However, some (Canon) have had problems in other areas. Rule of thumb, if it costs more, it will last longer. Yeah right. I guess that's why inexpensive high-end P&S cameras will outlast DSLRs 30 times over because of all the mechanical linkage that DSLRs need to operate their mirror-slapping, image-shaking, last-century technology. Interesting theory. But I'm still shooting an SLR body from 1982 and one from 1969, whereas two digital P&S have crapped out on the household (third is going strong). I expect the mechanics of my D200 to outlast the electronics. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PhotoBanter.com