PhotoBanter.com

PhotoBanter.com (http://www.photobanter.com/index.php)
-   Other Photographic Equipment (http://www.photobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Why don't camera reviews cover the data connection to the PC? (http://www.photobanter.com/showthread.php?t=103310)

Pat Cheney December 27th 08 06:19 AM

Why don't camera reviews cover the data connection to the PC?
 
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:34:21 -0800, John Navas wrote:

Don't let that stop you from notifying your local newspapers, consumer
advocates, and government representatives. Probably should start at the
city/county level and work your way up. This outrage must end!


It doesn't strike you as deceptive that both Casio listed a tremendous
amount of detail in that referenced web site for the other components yet
listed something as critical as a non-standard interface using standard
language?

http://www.casio.com/products/Camera...om/EX-Z1080BE/

Calling this Casio-proprietary port USB or USB/AV (when it comes with both
USB and AV cables) is wrong.

Casio should have called it "Proprietary USB/AV" or "Casio port" or
whatever that port is officially called.

BTW, does anyone know what the official name of the Casio proprietary
camera port is called?

John Navas[_2_] December 27th 08 06:44 AM

Why don't camera reviews cover the data connection to the PC?
 
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:19:32 -0800, Pat Cheney wrote
in :

On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:34:21 -0800, John Navas wrote:

Don't let that stop you from notifying your local newspapers, consumer
advocates, and government representatives. Probably should start at the
city/county level and work your way up. This outrage must end!


I didn't write that. Be more careful when quoting (in addition to when
buying).

It doesn't strike you as deceptive that both Casio listed a tremendous
amount of detail in that referenced web site for the other components yet
listed something as critical as a non-standard interface using standard
language?

http://www.casio.com/products/Camera...om/EX-Z1080BE/


Nope. It's common throughout the industry, for the reason I've already
explained.

Calling this Casio-proprietary port USB or USB/AV (when it comes with both
USB and AV cables) is wrong.


Nope. It is a standard USB port even though the connector is
non-standard. The supplied cable works with any standard USB connector.

Casio should have called it "Proprietary USB/AV" or "Casio port" or
whatever that port is officially called.


To make you happy? Would you have been happier if the cable were
permanently connected to the camera, eliminating the connector you don't
like?

BTW, does anyone know what the official name of the Casio proprietary
camera port is called?


USB/AV Connector, just as it says.

--
Very best wishes for the holiday season and for the coming new year,
John


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PhotoBanter.com