|
Huge 2mp camera with optical zoom
Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year:
http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html |
scott wrote:
Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year: http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html And if we are really lucky we can even reckognize shapes behind all the noise. What the heck. Its like computers. People look for GHz not actual performance. Enjoy your 6MP phone. Andre -- ---------------------------------- http://www.aguntherphotography.com |
scott wrote:
Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year: http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html That won't change the physics behind photography. The more light you gather the more are the chances of getting a good image. And as I understand, the bigger your filming plane (film or sensor) and the bigger your lens (light gathering hole), the better is your image likely to be. IMHO, the need to shrink phones and have a big lens/sensor to capture good images are opposite directions. Something, that'll never make good cameras out of phones. Yes, it is very much possible that the quality of images from phones might be so *acceptable* to general users that they switch to phones exclusively for shooting. Personally, I want a hot-pluggable chip in my head to snap and store anything that looks interesting ;-) That will always beat carrying around any equipment (phone/camera) on convenience and speed. Cheers, Siddhartha |
"andre" wrote in message
scott wrote: Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year: http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html And if we are really lucky we can even reckognize shapes behind all the noise. What the heck. Its like computers. People look for GHz not actual performance. Enjoy your 6MP phone. But surely the technology will advance to allow the sensitivities we have today in dSLR sensors to made much smaller in a few years time? |
scott wrote:
Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year: http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html Cute. Doubt that the image quality will be all that great, though. There's a reason telescopes are big, and it has nothing to do with technology. -- Ray Fischer |
scott wrote:
Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year: http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html Cute. Doubt that the image quality will be all that great, though. There's a reason telescopes are big, and it has nothing to do with technology. -- Ray Fischer |
scott wrote:
Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year: http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html Cute. Doubt that the image quality will be all that great, though. There's a reason telescopes are big, and it has nothing to do with technology. -- Ray Fischer |
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:22:38 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote: scott wrote: Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year: http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html Cute. Doubt that the image quality will be all that great, Agreed, why the need? Especially since all I have seen, compress the image beyond what I would waste any space to save. though. There's a reason telescopes are big, and it has nothing to do with technology. -- Ray Fischer |
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:55:51 GMT, (ZONED!)
wrote: On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:22:38 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote: scott wrote: Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year: http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html Cute. Doubt that the image quality will be all that great, Agreed, why the need? Especially since all I have seen, compress the image beyond what I would waste any space to save. Cell phones. though. There's a reason telescopes are big, and it has nothing to do with technology. -- Ray Fischer Bill Funk Change "g" to "a" |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:13 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PhotoBanter.com