Color Science
Something on-topic for a change: U Tube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMfC...uwzOcpWqeg3VvI or http://tinyurl.com/y9f6zbxw I know someone who will like this. :-) -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
Color Science
In article .com,
Savageduck wrote: Something on-topic for a change: U Tube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMfC...&fbclid=IwAR37 9N Ie scWYXY09k0OCP5UuDIZ7sgmAt-socH7vuf-FFuwzOcpWqeg3VvI or http://tinyurl.com/y9f6zbxw I know someone who will like this. :-) It just shows that most (not all) of us are biased in justifying, and reinforcing the choices we made when making camera purchase decisions. That said, I have few complaints with my move from Nikon to Fujifilm, and while two years ago, I was second guessing myself by not going with a D500, I am more than happy with my X-T3. ...and thanks for posting something on topic. ;-) BTW: There was no need to use the full URL, or tinyurl if you just go to the Youtube *Share* option and copy the already shortened Youtube URL, like this. https://youtu.be/EMfCDujQywY or truncate it past the &featu https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMfCDujQywY except that it's shillboy, and therefore not worth watching. |
Color Science
On Nov 7, 2018, Eric Stevens wrote
(in ): Something on-topic for a change: U Tube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMfC...d=IwAR37 9NIe scWYXY09k0OCP5UuDIZ7sgmAt-socH7vuf-FFuwzOcpWqeg3VvI or http://tinyurl.com/y9f6zbxw I know someone who will like this. :-) It just shows that most (not all) of us are biased in justifying, and reinforcing the choices we made when making camera purchase decisions. That said, I have few complaints with my move from Nikon to Fujifilm, and while two years ago, I was second guessing myself by not going with a D500, I am more than happy with my X-T3. ....and thanks for posting something on topic. ;-) -- Regards, Savageduck |
Color Science
On Nov 7, 2018, Savageduck wrote
(in iganews.com): On Nov 7, 2018, Eric Stevens wrote (in ): Something on-topic for a change: U Tube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMfC...lid=IwAR37 9N Ie scWYXY09k0OCP5UuDIZ7sgmAt-socH7vuf-FFuwzOcpWqeg3VvI or http://tinyurl.com/y9f6zbxw I know someone who will like this. :-) It just shows that most (not all) of us are biased in justifying, and reinforcing the choices we made when making camera purchase decisions. That said, I have few complaints with my move from Nikon to Fujifilm, and while two years ago, I was second guessing myself by not going with a D500, I am more than happy with my X-T3. ...and thanks for posting something on topic. ;-) BTW: There was no need to use the full URL, or tinyurl if you just go to the Youtube *Share* option and copy the already shortened Youtube URL, like this. https://youtu.be/EMfCDujQywY -- Regards, Savageduck |
Color Science
On Nov 7, 2018, RichA wrote
(in ): On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 15:37:51 UTC-5, Eric Stevens wrote: Something on-topic for a change: U Tube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMfC...lid=IwAR37 9N IescWYXY09k0OCP5UuDIZ7sgmAt-socH7vuf-FFuwzOcpWqeg3VvI or http://tinyurl.com/y9f6zbxw I know someone who will like this. :-) The thing is GARBAGE. What thing, is GARBAGE? Your response is a tad vague. -- Regards, Savageduck |
Color Science
On Nov 7, 2018, nospam wrote
(in ) : In iganews.com, Savageduck wrote: Something on-topic for a change: U Tube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMfC...&fbclid=IwAR37 9N Ie scWYXY09k0OCP5UuDIZ7sgmAt-socH7vuf-FFuwzOcpWqeg3VvI or http://tinyurl.com/y9f6zbxw I know someone who will like this. :-) It just shows that most (not all) of us are biased in justifying, and reinforcing the choices we made when making camera purchase decisions. That said, I have few complaints with my move from Nikon to Fujifilm, and while two years ago, I was second guessing myself by not going with a D500, I am more than happy with my X-T3. ...and thanks for posting something on topic. ;-) BTW: There was no need to use the full URL, or tinyurl if you just go to the Youtube *Share* option and copy the already shortened Youtube URL, like this. https://youtu.be/EMfCDujQywY or truncate it past the &featu https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMfCDujQywY except that it's shillboy, and therefore not worth watching. That is another issue all together. -- Regards, Savageduck |
Color Science
On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 19:07:36 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article .com, Savageduck wrote: Something on-topic for a change: U Tube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMfC...&fbclid=IwAR37 9N Ie scWYXY09k0OCP5UuDIZ7sgmAt-socH7vuf-FFuwzOcpWqeg3VvI or http://tinyurl.com/y9f6zbxw I know someone who will like this. :-) It just shows that most (not all) of us are biased in justifying, and reinforcing the choices we made when making camera purchase decisions. That said, I have few complaints with my move from Nikon to Fujifilm, and while two years ago, I was second guessing myself by not going with a D500, I am more than happy with my X-T3. ...and thanks for posting something on topic. ;-) BTW: There was no need to use the full URL, or tinyurl if you just go to the Youtube *Share* option and copy the already shortened Youtube URL, like this. https://youtu.be/EMfCDujQywY or truncate it past the &featu https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMfCDujQywY except that it's shillboy, and therefore not worth watching. I found it interesting. It's not actually about color but peoples perception of color and color preferences. It's more psychology than photography. There is quite a lot to be learned from it. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
Color Science
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: I found it interesting. It's not actually about color but peoples perception of color and color preferences. It's more psychology than photography. There is quite a lot to be learned from it. there's nothing at all to be learned from it, especially since he has no understanding himself. the entire video could be summarized as different cameras when set to their default settings produce jpegs that look different. |
Color Science
In article .com,
Savageduck wrote: I found it interesting. It's not actually about color but peoples perception of color and color preferences. It's more psychology than photography. There is quite a lot to be learned from it. there's nothing at all to be learned from it, especially since he has no understanding himself. the entire video could be summarized as different cameras when set to their default settings produce jpegs that look different. ...but, the result, regardless of the actual IQ/color fidelity of the various prints was an indication of individual manufacturer bias among those who responded to his test. It didn¹t actually matter which cameras were used, or even if different cameras were used. What mattered was that those polled believed that different cameras were used, and that they believed that the prints were the product of the cameras on the labeled prints. people believe all sorts of things. this is not news. This was much the same as a blind wine tasting where due to mixed/changed labels, tasters are confused between a bottle of Trader Joe¹s *Two Buck Chuck* and a $50 bottle. one of the better ones was where red food coloring was added to white wine and fooled wine experts. it's also the same nonsense audiophiles spew, such as one speaker cable sounding better than another, something that is electrically impossible. people are very easily influenced. As Eric said, this actually had nothing to do with photography, or actual *color science*, but the particular brand biases/prejudices of the group of tested testers. So it had nothing to do with Northrup¹s photographic knowledge, lack thereof, or how much the Northrups might be shills for any particular brand. in other words, nothing useful. and he was shilling, just not for a particular product. at the end of the video, he hyped a link via his tracking service, the results of which he then markets to advertisers. he could have given the direct link, but then he would not get paid as much. |
Color Science
On Nov 8, 2018, nospam wrote
(in ) : In , Eric Stevens wrote: I found it interesting. It's not actually about color but peoples perception of color and color preferences. It's more psychology than photography. There is quite a lot to be learned from it. there's nothing at all to be learned from it, especially since he has no understanding himself. the entire video could be summarized as different cameras when set to their default settings produce jpegs that look different. ....but, the result, regardless of the actual IQ/color fidelity of the various prints was an indication of individual manufacturer bias among those who responded to his test. It didn’t actually matter which cameras were used, or even if different cameras were used. What mattered was that those polled believed that different cameras were used, and that they believed that the prints were the product of the cameras on the labeled prints. This was much the same as a blind wine tasting where due to mixed/changed labels, tasters are confused between a bottle of Trader Joe’s *Two Buck Chuck* and a $50 bottle. As Eric said, this actually had nothing to do with photography, or actual *color science*, but the particular brand biases/prejudices of the group of tested testers. So it had nothing to do with Northrup’s photographic knowledge, lack thereof, or how much the Northrups might be shills for any particular brand. -- Regards, Savageduck |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PhotoBanter.com