NG screw up.
 

Well, just in case anyone thinks the National Geographic is perfect, there's
a full page photograph on page 112 of this month's issue that is printed
backwards.

"William Graham" wrote in message
news:Jo86d.271835$mD.144953@attbi_s02...
Well, just in case anyone thinks the National Geographic is perfect,
there's
a full page photograph on page 112 of this month's issue that is printed
backwards.


Maybe next time you will read the text that accompanies the image (pg. 113)
before you get too excited?

"...tintypes...The resulting positive images appear backwards, as in a
mirror."

Jim Kramer

"jimkramer" wrote in message
...
"William Graham" wrote in message
news:Jo86d.271835$mD.144953@attbi_s02...
Well, just in case anyone thinks the National Geographic is perfect,
there's
a full page photograph on page 112 of this month's issue that is printed
backwards.


Maybe next time you will read the text that accompanies the image (pg.
113)
before you get too excited?

"...tintypes...The resulting positive images appear backwards, as in a
mirror."

Jim Kramer


Ha! - You're right.....But, after all, did they really have to print one
backwards to illustrate the point?

"jimkramer" wrote in message
...
"William Graham" wrote in message
news:Jo86d.271835$mD.144953@attbi_s02...
Well, just in case anyone thinks the National Geographic is perfect,
there's
a full page photograph on page 112 of this month's issue that is printed
backwards.


Maybe next time you will read the text that accompanies the image (pg.
113)
before you get too excited?

"...tintypes...The resulting positive images appear backwards, as in a
mirror."

Jim Kramer


Ha! - You're right.....But, after all, did they really have to print one
backwards to illustrate the point?