|
|
Thouoght I'd share some pictures
|
Thouoght I'd share some pictures
Dennis wrote:
www.dspappa.com/eyestravel/index.html Please don't. While posting an image or two for specific equipment or technique discussion is welcome, posting of entire collections just for the hell of it is not. |
Thouoght I'd share some pictures
Tony Gartshore wrote:
In article , says... Dennis wrote: www.dspappa.com/eyestravel/index.html Please don't. While posting an image or two for specific equipment or technique discussion is welcome, posting of entire collections just for the hell of it is not. All he's posted is a link to his website... The point is to not post pointless posts directing to a website for that purpose alone. Posting photos directly to this ng (as an attachement aka binary) is also not permitted by the NG charter. (2nd link below). Posting an image link to discuss an issue with equipment or technique is another matter as stated above. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. |
Thouoght I'd share some pictures
"Alan Browne" wrote in message ... Dennis wrote: www.dspappa.com/eyestravel/index.html Please don't. While posting an image or two for specific equipment or technique discussion is welcome, posting of entire collections just for the hell of it is not. Mind you, Alan, posting the link is not all that bad. One can decide to see or see. However, my advice to the OP is if he's going to post on the Internet for this group or ANY person, family, whatever, he should refrain from printing: *Eyes of Pappa Photography* at the bottom of every photo. It ruins them all. Marcel |
Thouoght I'd share some pictures
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 18:47:50 -0400, Alan Browne
wrote: : Tony Gartshore wrote: : In article , : says... : Dennis wrote: : www.dspappa.com/eyestravel/index.html : Please don't. While posting an image or two for specific equipment or : technique discussion is welcome, posting of entire collections just for : the hell of it is not. : : All he's posted is a link to his website... : : The point is to not post pointless posts directing to a website for that : purpose alone. Posting photos directly to this ng (as an attachement : aka binary) is also not permitted by the NG charter. (2nd link below). : : Posting an image link to discuss an issue with equipment or technique is : another matter as stated above. Fair enough. But where is the prohibition against posting a link to one's pictures? What is your definition of the words "permitted" and "encouraged" in the following quotation from the newsgroup's charter? "Can we include photographs with our postings to r.p.d.slr-systems? No. The charter of the newsgroup prohibits the attaching of photographs and other attachments (usually referred to as binaries.) However, posting links to photographs is permitted, even encouraged whenever discussion of a particular problem or desired result are discussed." Bob |
Thouoght I'd share some pictures
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:37:10 -0400, "Celcius" wrote:
: : "Alan Browne" wrote in message : ... : Dennis wrote: : www.dspappa.com/eyestravel/index.html : : Please don't. While posting an image or two for specific equipment or : technique discussion is welcome, posting of entire collections just for : the hell of it is not. : : Mind you, Alan, posting the link is not all that bad. One can decide to see : or see. : However, my advice to the OP is if he's going to post on the Internet for : this group or ANY person, family, whatever, he should refrain from printing: : *Eyes of Pappa Photography* at the bottom of every photo. It ruins them all. : Marcel That's the objective, isn't it? He wants to show them to us without the risk that someone will rip them off. If you like a picture enough to care that the legend is there, then you should buy it; and then Dennis will send you the high-resolution version without the legend. Makes perfect sense to me. Bob |
Thouoght I'd share some pictures
"Robert Coe" wrote in message ... On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 18:47:50 -0400, Alan Browne wrote: : Tony Gartshore wrote: : In article , : says... : Dennis wrote: : www.dspappa.com/eyestravel/index.html : Please don't. While posting an image or two for specific equipment or : technique discussion is welcome, posting of entire collections just for : the hell of it is not. : : All he's posted is a link to his website... : : The point is to not post pointless posts directing to a website for that : purpose alone. Posting photos directly to this ng (as an attachement : aka binary) is also not permitted by the NG charter. (2nd link below). : : Posting an image link to discuss an issue with equipment or technique is : another matter as stated above. Fair enough. But where is the prohibition against posting a link to one's pictures? What is your definition of the words "permitted" and "encouraged" in the following quotation from the newsgroup's charter? "Can we include photographs with our postings to r.p.d.slr-systems? No. The charter of the newsgroup prohibits the attaching of photographs and other attachments (usually referred to as binaries.) However, posting links to photographs is permitted, even encouraged whenever discussion of a particular problem or desired result are discussed." Bob Alan should probably take his PBase link off his sig then? |
Thouoght I'd share some pictures
"Robert Coe" wrote in message ... On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:37:10 -0400, "Celcius" wrote: : : "Alan Browne" wrote in message : ... : Dennis wrote: : www.dspappa.com/eyestravel/index.html : : Please don't. While posting an image or two for specific equipment or : technique discussion is welcome, posting of entire collections just for : the hell of it is not. : : Mind you, Alan, posting the link is not all that bad. One can decide to see : or see. : However, my advice to the OP is if he's going to post on the Internet for : this group or ANY person, family, whatever, he should refrain from printing: : *Eyes of Pappa Photography* at the bottom of every photo. It ruins them all. : Marcel That's the objective, isn't it? He wants to show them to us without the risk that someone will rip them off. If you like a picture enough to care that the legend is there, then you should buy it; and then Dennis will send you the high-resolution version without the legend. Makes perfect sense to me. Bob Not really, this is not a comercial group and anyone that uses it for that should be immediatly killfilled. |
Thouoght I'd share some pictures
"Pete D" wrote:
Alan should probably take his PBase link off his sig then? Don't be silly. None of Alan's little "rules" ever apply to Alan! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PhotoBanter.com