PhotoBanter.com

PhotoBanter.com (http://www.photobanter.com/index.php)
-   Digital Photography (http://www.photobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Huge 2mp camera with optical zoom (http://www.photobanter.com/showthread.php?t=15135)

scott October 6th 04 10:53 PM

Huge 2mp camera with optical zoom
 
Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year:

http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html




andre October 7th 04 07:55 AM

scott wrote:
Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year:

http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html



And if we are really lucky we can even reckognize shapes behind all the
noise. What the heck. Its like computers. People look for GHz not actual
performance.

Enjoy your 6MP phone.

Andre

--
----------------------------------
http://www.aguntherphotography.com

Siddhartha Jain October 7th 04 10:45 AM

scott wrote:
Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year:

http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html


That won't change the physics behind photography. The more light you
gather the more are the chances of getting a good image. And as I
understand, the bigger your filming plane (film or sensor) and the
bigger your lens (light gathering hole), the better is your image
likely to be.

IMHO, the need to shrink phones and have a big lens/sensor to capture
good images are opposite directions. Something, that'll never make good
cameras out of phones. Yes, it is very much possible that the quality
of images from phones might be so *acceptable* to general users that
they switch to phones exclusively for shooting.

Personally, I want a hot-pluggable chip in my head to snap and store
anything that looks interesting ;-) That will always beat carrying
around any equipment (phone/camera) on convenience and speed.
Cheers,

Siddhartha


scott October 7th 04 10:00 PM

"andre" wrote in message

scott wrote:
Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year:

http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html



And if we are really lucky we can even reckognize shapes behind all
the noise. What the heck. Its like computers. People look for GHz
not actual performance.

Enjoy your 6MP phone.


But surely the technology will advance to allow the sensitivities we have
today in dSLR sensors to made much smaller in a few years time?



Ray Fischer October 16th 04 10:22 PM

scott wrote:
Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year:

http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html


Cute. Doubt that the image quality will be all that great, though.
There's a reason telescopes are big, and it has nothing to do with
technology.

--
Ray Fischer



Ray Fischer October 16th 04 10:22 PM

scott wrote:
Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year:

http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html


Cute. Doubt that the image quality will be all that great, though.
There's a reason telescopes are big, and it has nothing to do with
technology.

--
Ray Fischer



Ray Fischer October 16th 04 10:22 PM

scott wrote:
Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year:

http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html


Cute. Doubt that the image quality will be all that great, though.
There's a reason telescopes are big, and it has nothing to do with
technology.

--
Ray Fischer



ZONED! October 16th 04 10:55 PM

On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:22:38 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote:

scott wrote:
Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year:

http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html

Cute. Doubt that the image quality will be all that great,


Agreed, why the need? Especially since all I have seen, compress the
image beyond what I would waste any space to save.

though.
There's a reason telescopes are big, and it has nothing to do with
technology.

--
Ray Fischer




ZONED! October 16th 04 10:55 PM

On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:22:38 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote:

scott wrote:
Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year:

http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html

Cute. Doubt that the image quality will be all that great,


Agreed, why the need? Especially since all I have seen, compress the
image beyond what I would waste any space to save.

though.
There's a reason telescopes are big, and it has nothing to do with
technology.

--
Ray Fischer




Big Bill October 17th 04 04:20 PM

On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:55:51 GMT, (ZONED!)
wrote:

On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:22:38 GMT,
(Ray
Fischer) wrote:

scott wrote:
Maybe our 6mp sensors of today will be like this next year:

http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/040916.html

Cute. Doubt that the image quality will be all that great,


Agreed, why the need? Especially since all I have seen, compress the
image beyond what I would waste any space to save.


Cell phones.

though.
There's a reason telescopes are big, and it has nothing to do with
technology.

--
Ray Fischer



Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PhotoBanter.com