Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
 

Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF...

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08..._7_6.asp#specs

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.

Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
 

Alan Browne wrote:

Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF...

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08..._7_6.asp#specs

Maximum image file size: 345MP. IIIeeeeeee!


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html

Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
 

Blinky the Shark wrote:
Alan Browne wrote:

Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF...

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08..._7_6.asp#specs

Maximum image file size: 345MP. IIIeeeeeee!

When I scan MF film I get near 500 Mpix per image. But I bet the
digital cameras (Leaf or Blad) give cleaner images...


--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.

Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
 

Alan Browne wrote:
Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF...

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08..._7_6.asp#specs


What sorts of lenses do these cameras (As opposed to backs) use?

I was unable to find good info on Google ... I did find
mention of Schneider and 70 lp/mm.

Doug McDonald

Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
 

lid wrote:
Alan Browne wrote:
Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF...

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08..._7_6.asp#specs



What sorts of lenses do these cameras (As opposed to backs) use?

I was unable to find good info on Google ... I did find
mention of Schneider and 70 lp/mm.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leaf_Me...at_Photography

notes that it uses a line of Schneider AF 'digital' lenses as well as
Rollei 6008 lenses (of which there are more than Schneider...
http://www.rollei.jp/e/pd/rl60_lens.html )


--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.

Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
 

Alan Browne wrote:
Blinky the Shark wrote:
Alan Browne wrote:

Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF...

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08..._7_6.asp#specs


Maximum image file size: 345MP. IIIeeeeeee!

When I scan MF film I get near 500 Mpix per image. But I bet the
digital cameras (Leaf or Blad) give cleaner images...


If not, your money back.....

--
john mcwilliams

Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
 

Blinky the Shark wrote,on my timestamp of 11/09/2008 6:36 AM:
Alan Browne wrote:

Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF...

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08..._7_6.asp#specs

Maximum image file size: 345MP. IIIeeeeeee!

Pah! That's nothing!

Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
 

Richard wrote:
"Alan Browne" wrote in message
...
Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF...

Good thing they have lots of "Leaf" lenses to do it with. Hah hah
ahah !

As Alan has mentioned, this system can use the lenses designed for the 6008i
series of cameras. So, there are a full range of lenses available.

Neil

Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
 

Scott W wrote:
On Sep 10, 10:57 am, Alan Browne
wrote:
Blinky the Shark wrote:
Alan Browne wrote:
Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF...
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08...tus_10_7_6.asp...
Maximum image file size: 345MP. IIIeeeeeee!
When I scan MF film I get near 500 Mpix per image. But I bet the
digital cameras (Leaf or Blad) give cleaner images...

You must mean 500 MBtyes, not MPix. a frame from a 6x9 camera scanned
at 4000 ppi would give you about 125 MPix. You would have to be
scanning at 8000 ppi to get to 500 MP.

Quite correct, I meant Mbytes;

However, 4000 dpi (56mm / 25.4 * 4000 = ~8800) @ 16 b/col

So, 8800^2 pixels for about 460 Mbyte @ 48 bits/pixel.


--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.

Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
 

Alan Browne wrote:
Scott W wrote:
On Sep 10, 10:57 am, Alan Browne
wrote:
Blinky the Shark wrote:
Alan Browne wrote:
Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF...
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08...tus_10_7_6.asp...

Maximum image file size: 345MP. IIIeeeeeee!
When I scan MF film I get near 500 Mpix per image. But I bet the
digital cameras (Leaf or Blad) give cleaner images...

You must mean 500 MBtyes, not MPix. a frame from a 6x9 camera scanned
at 4000 ppi would give you about 125 MPix. You would have to be
scanning at 8000 ppi to get to 500 MP.

Quite correct, I meant Mbytes;

However, 4000 dpi (56mm / 25.4 * 4000 = ~8800) @ 16 b/col

So, 8800^2 pixels for about 460 Mbyte @ 48 bits/pixel.

Last sentence: pixels. Previous one: dpi: Disconnect!

Are you purposely using that misnomer to prove something, or do you
still not get it that it can make a difference to others' understanding,
no matter how perfectly you get it?

--
john mcwilliams