ping nospaam
In a prior thread I stated that one of my friends had a $10,000 iWatch, and you said it was impossible. I confirmed the other day that he had only spent $1,000. I misunderstood what he said. You were right. -- PeterN |
ping nospaam
On 9/13/15 PDT 1:25 AM, PeterN wrote:
In a prior thread I stated that one of my friends had a $10,000 iWatch, No you didn't. and you said it was impossible. No, he didn't. I confirmed the other day that he had only spent $1,000. I misunderstood what he said. Yes, you really, really did! Can't you learn to listen carefully? Comprehension is lacking. You were right. No he wasn't, just because you were wrong. READ!! -- The above non-sensical gainsaying of everything and a few critical remarks is my impression of a number of threads. Well done, Peter for bellying up to the bar and admitting a wrong statement. But it's certainly possible to order an Apple Watch for $10,000 or more. (no "i") |
ping nospaam
On 9/13/2015 1:02 PM, John McWilliams wrote:
On 9/13/15 PDT 1:25 AM, PeterN wrote: In a prior thread I stated that one of my friends had a $10,000 iWatch, No you didn't. and you said it was impossible. No, he didn't. I confirmed the other day that he had only spent $1,000. I misunderstood what he said. Yes, you really, really did! Can't you learn to listen carefully? Comprehension is lacking. You were right. No he wasn't, just because you were wrong. READ!! You misread what I said, but it is not worth a discussion. -- PeterN |
ping nospaam
On 2015-09-15 01:56:28 +0000, PeterN said:
On 9/13/2015 1:02 PM, John McWilliams wrote: On 9/13/15 PDT 1:25 AM, PeterN wrote: In a prior thread I stated that one of my friends had a $10,000 iWatch, No you didn't. and you said it was impossible. No, he didn't. I confirmed the other day that he had only spent $1,000. I misunderstood what he said. Yes, you really, really did! Can't you learn to listen carefully? Comprehension is lacking. You were right. No he wasn't, just because you were wrong. READ!! You misread what I said, but it is not worth a discussion. ....and you missed the Pythonesque "argument". -- Regards, Savageduck |
ping nospaam
On 9/14/2015 10:11 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2015-09-15 01:56:28 +0000, PeterN said: On 9/13/2015 1:02 PM, John McWilliams wrote: On 9/13/15 PDT 1:25 AM, PeterN wrote: In a prior thread I stated that one of my friends had a $10,000 iWatch, No you didn't. and you said it was impossible. No, he didn't. I confirmed the other day that he had only spent $1,000. I misunderstood what he said. Yes, you really, really did! Can't you learn to listen carefully? Comprehension is lacking. You were right. No he wasn't, just because you were wrong. READ!! You misread what I said, but it is not worth a discussion. ...and you missed the Pythonesque "argument". Probably -- PeterN |
ping nospaam
On 9/15/15 PDT 10:07 AM, PeterN wrote:
On 9/14/2015 10:11 PM, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-09-15 01:56:28 +0000, PeterN said: On 9/13/2015 1:02 PM, John McWilliams wrote: On 9/13/15 PDT 1:25 AM, PeterN wrote: In a prior thread I stated that one of my friends had a $10,000 iWatch, No you didn't. and you said it was impossible. No, he didn't. I confirmed the other day that he had only spent $1,000. I misunderstood what he said. Yes, you really, really did! Can't you learn to listen carefully? Comprehension is lacking. You were right. No he wasn't, just because you were wrong. READ!! You misread what I said, but it is not worth a discussion. ...and you missed the Pythonesque "argument". Probably Perhaps you missed the critical information in the signature line contained in the first reply. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PhotoBanter.com