PhotoBanter.com

PhotoBanter.com (http://www.photobanter.com/index.php)
-   Digital Photography (http://www.photobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   The Aftermath (http://www.photobanter.com/showthread.php?t=129621)

Savageduck[_3_] July 10th 16 04:50 AM

The Aftermath
 
This is what our neighborhood looks like after our fire.
https://db.tt/VHYNod4U
https://db.tt/l9XTaSIV

--
Regards,

Savageduck


Eric Stevens July 10th 16 05:36 AM

The Aftermath
 
On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 20:50:05 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

This is what our neighborhood looks like after our fire.
https://db.tt/VHYNod4U
https://db.tt/l9XTaSIV


It will be interesting to see what it looks like this time next year.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

Savageduck[_3_] July 10th 16 05:39 AM

The Aftermath
 
On 2016-07-10 04:36:30 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 20:50:05 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

This is what our neighborhood looks like after our fire.
https://db.tt/VHYNod4U
https://db.tt/l9XTaSIV


It will be interesting to see what it looks like this time next year.


If we get any rain this Winter, this time next year it should be green
starting to dry to golden brown for Summer.

--
Regards,

Savageduck


Eric Stevens July 10th 16 06:15 AM

The Aftermath
 
On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 21:39:28 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-07-10 04:36:30 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 20:50:05 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

This is what our neighborhood looks like after our fire.
https://db.tt/VHYNod4U
https://db.tt/l9XTaSIV


It will be interesting to see what it looks like this time next year.


If we get any rain this Winter, this time next year it should be green
starting to dry to golden brown for Summer.


.... and the trees?
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

Savageduck[_3_] July 10th 16 06:28 AM

The Aftermath
 
On 2016-07-10 05:15:11 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 21:39:28 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-07-10 04:36:30 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 20:50:05 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

This is what our neighborhood looks like after our fire.
https://db.tt/VHYNod4U
https://db.tt/l9XTaSIV

It will be interesting to see what it looks like this time next year.


If we get any rain this Winter, this time next year it should be green
starting to dry to golden brown for Summer.


... and the trees?


Unless they are totally charred the California Live Oaks are pretty
resilient. They don't burn like conifers which are loaded with fuel.
--
Regards,

Savageduck


Eric Stevens July 10th 16 09:34 AM

The Aftermath
 
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 02:46:23 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article 2016070922284396220-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
says...

On 2016-07-10 05:15:11 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 21:39:28 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-07-10 04:36:30 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 20:50:05 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

This is what our neighborhood looks like after our fire.
https://db.tt/VHYNod4U
https://db.tt/l9XTaSIV

It will be interesting to see what it looks like this time next year.

If we get any rain this Winter, this time next year it should be green
starting to dry to golden brown for Summer.

... and the trees?


Unless they are totally charred the California Live Oaks are pretty
resilient. They don't burn like conifers which are loaded with fuel.


Depends on the conifer. Some conifers are pyrophytic--they need fire to
reproduce.



All that suggests that fires are part of the natural cycle. In which
case its better to have more frequent and smaller than to let the fuel
accumulate to feed larger fires. This is much the same as fires in
Australia. Fires are natural and we have to live with them. Putting
them off and letting the fuel burden accumulate just makes for bigger
fires when they inevitably occur.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

PeterN[_6_] July 10th 16 09:25 PM

The Aftermath
 
On 7/9/2016 11:50 PM, Savageduck wrote:
This is what our neighborhood looks like after our fire.
https://db.tt/VHYNod4U
https://db.tt/l9XTaSIV


Glad you and you house are safe.From what I read, the vegetation will
regenerate, if floods don't wash the soil away before the roots grow in.
--
PeterN

Savageduck[_3_] July 10th 16 09:35 PM

The Aftermath
 
On 2016-07-10 20:25:25 +0000, PeterN said:

On 7/9/2016 11:50 PM, Savageduck wrote:
This is what our neighborhood looks like after our fire.
https://db.tt/VHYNod4U
https://db.tt/l9XTaSIV


Glad you and you house are safe.From what I read, the vegetation will
regenerate, if floods don't wash the soil away before the roots grow in.


Floods! In my corner of California we would be happy with any rain.

--
Regards,

Savageduck


newshound July 11th 16 10:33 AM

The Aftermath
 
On 7/10/2016 9:34 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 02:46:23 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article 2016070922284396220-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
says...

On 2016-07-10 05:15:11 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 21:39:28 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-07-10 04:36:30 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 20:50:05 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

This is what our neighborhood looks like after our fire.
https://db.tt/VHYNod4U
https://db.tt/l9XTaSIV

It will be interesting to see what it looks like this time next year.

If we get any rain this Winter, this time next year it should be green
starting to dry to golden brown for Summer.

... and the trees?

Unless they are totally charred the California Live Oaks are pretty
resilient. They don't burn like conifers which are loaded with fuel.


Depends on the conifer. Some conifers are pyrophytic--they need fire to
reproduce.



All that suggests that fires are part of the natural cycle. In which
case its better to have more frequent and smaller than to let the fuel
accumulate to feed larger fires. This is much the same as fires in
Australia. Fires are natural and we have to live with them. Putting
them off and letting the fuel burden accumulate just makes for bigger
fires when they inevitably occur.


And fires are one of the things which helps to hold oxygen levels down
to the present value.

John McWilliams July 11th 16 03:40 PM

The Aftermath
 
On 7/10/16 PDT 1:34 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 02:46:23 -0400, "J. Clarke"

Unless they are totally charred the California Live Oaks are pretty
resilient. They don't burn like conifers which are loaded with fuel.


Depends on the conifer. Some conifers are pyrophytic--they need fire to
reproduce.


All that suggests that fires are part of the natural cycle. In which
case its better to have more frequent and smaller than to let the fuel
accumulate to feed larger fires. This is much the same as fires in
Australia. Fires are natural and we have to live with them. Putting
them off and letting the fuel burden accumulate just makes for bigger
fires when they inevitably occur.

The US Forest Service subscribes to that knowledge, at least in some
areas. Carrying it out, though, is another matter. Some people freak
out at the thought of any flame anywhere. Plus those damn trees we
imported from down under are very flammable when dry.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PhotoBanter.com