Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
 

Chroma camera
https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...4-field-camera

Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-(

--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
 

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

Chroma camera

https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...ight-affordabl
e-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera

film, not digital.

Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-(

there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to
firefox.

Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
 

On 2018-02-23 16:04, Eric Stevens wrote:
Chroma camera
https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...4-field-camera

https://tinyurl.com/ybspbw93 ... via firefox & TinyURL site



--
“When it is all said and done, there are approximately 94 million
full-time workers in private industry paying taxes to support 102
million non-workers and 21 million government workers.
In what world does this represent a strong job market?”
..Jim Quinn

Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
 

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:14:29 -0500, nospam
wrote:

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

Chroma camera

https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...ight-affordabl
e-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera

film, not digital.

Read the subject line.

Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-(

there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to
firefox.

It is on this occasion. It's been removed from my tool bar on security
grounds.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
 

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:


https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...tweight-afford
able-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera

film, not digital.

Read the subject line.

read the name of the newsgroup.

Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-(

there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to
firefox.

It is on this occasion. It's been removed from my tool bar on security
grounds.

tinyurl doesn't need a toolbar item, and as i said, there's no need for
url shorterners on usenet.

Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
 

On 2018-02-23 17:58, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:14:29 -0500, nospam
wrote:

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

Chroma camera

https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...ight-affordabl
e-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera

film, not digital.

Read the subject line.

Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-(

there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to
firefox.

It is on this occasion. It's been removed from my tool bar on security
grounds.

1) You can just type "tinyurl" in the url bar and a link to it will
appear quickly.
2) You can put a bookbar shortcut in the bookmarks toolbar.

Not sure what the security issue could be as long as you edit the
bookmarks yourself. (Unless Firefox has some peculiar fault).

--
“When it is all said and done, there are approximately 94 million
full-time workers in private industry paying taxes to support 102
million non-workers and 21 million government workers.
In what world does this represent a strong job market?”
..Jim Quinn

Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
 

rOn Fri, 23 Feb 2018 18:00:25 -0500, nospam
wrote:

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:


https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...tweight-afford
able-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera

film, not digital.

Read the subject line.

read the name of the newsgroup.

You f***ing idiot! Why do you think I put the words "digital back"
into the heading?

Don't you know what a digital back is?

Just look at this one, for example (one of many).
https://fotodioxpro.com/products/hbh-4x5-pro
or this one
http://www.digital-photography.org/D..._field_pro.htm


Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-(

there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to
firefox.

It is on this occasion. It's been removed from my tool bar on security
grounds.

tinyurl doesn't need a toolbar item, and as i said, there's no need for
url shorterners on usenet.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
 

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 18:31:47 -0500, Alan Browne
wrote:

On 2018-02-23 17:58, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:14:29 -0500, nospam
wrote:

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

Chroma camera

https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...ight-affordabl
e-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera

film, not digital.

Read the subject line.

Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-(

there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to
firefox.

It is on this occasion. It's been removed from my tool bar on security
grounds.

1) You can just type "tinyurl" in the url bar and a link to it will
appear quickly.
2) You can put a bookbar shortcut in the bookmarks toolbar.

Agreed, but not as convenient as having it on the tool bar. I used to
be able to click on the tool bar and within a second or so I had it in
in the cliboard.

Not sure what the security issue could be as long as you edit the
bookmarks yourself. (Unless Firefox has some peculiar fault).

Something to do with lack of https.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
 

On 23/02/2018 21:14, nospam wrote:
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

Chroma camera

https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...ight-affordabl
e-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera

film, not digital.

Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-(

there's never a need for that on usenet,

There is if you use Thunderbird ;-)


--
Cheers, Rob

Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
 

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:


https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...ightweight-aff
ordable-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera

film, not digital.

Read the subject line.

read the name of the newsgroup.

You f***ing idiot! Why do you think I put the words "digital back"
into the heading?

Don't you know what a digital back is?

i do, but don't expect to find one that's any good a price you can
afford.

Just look at this one, for example (one of many).
https://fotodioxpro.com/products/hbh-4x5-pro

junk. laughably so.

why bother using a 4x5 camera if you're only going to mount an slr on
the back?

or this one

http://www.digital-photography.org/D...al/dicomed_fie
ld_pro.htm

that article is almost 20 years old, but at least they used a mac,
except that particular mac is long discontinued, so even if you can
find the back, it won't do you any good.

here's a bunch of backs, using that 'new high-speed usb 2' technology:
http://www.betterlight.com/products4X5.html

the cheaper ones have less resolution than modern slrs and their top of
the line model is about what a medium format camera can do. and then
there's that perfectly still subject problem.