PhotoBanter.com

PhotoBanter.com (http://www.photobanter.com/index.php)
-   35mm Photo Equipment (http://www.photobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   $500 reward for identity of image thief (http://www.photobanter.com/showthread.php?t=59570)

D-Mac March 28th 06 11:15 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
A CASH REWARD IS OFFERED for information leading to the identity of an
Internet thief, proven liar and stalker.

A person posting with the credentials of:

and


Is engaged in theft of my photographs of my web site and defamation of
me and my family. He has conducted a 2 year long campaign against me of
lies, defamation and threats. I am now committed to pursuing and
silencing him through the court system, regardless of the cost.

My name is Douglas MacDonald.
I run a number of web sites the most significant is photosbydouglas.com
and canvasphotos.com.au I am a law abiding Australian business person
with deep involvement community activities. I pay my taxes, register
with all necessary Government departments and provide a legal and valid
warranty and refund procedure in my business activities.

No one should have to contend with lies and defamatory statements from
anyone when they run a legitimate business. I've had enough of this and
now intend to silence him legally.

I offer now a NO-QUESTIONS-ASKED $500 AUD cash reward for information of
the real identity and residential address of the person using these
identities.

The money will be paid by my lawyers at Eagle Street Brisbane on
successful service of summonses on this person. The payment will be cash
and you do not need to identify yourself, just wait until your
information is verified and the court papers served, to be paid.

Mal March 29th 06 02:39 AM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 

"D-Mac" wrote in message
...
A CASH REWARD IS OFFERED for information leading to the identity of an
Internet thief, proven liar and stalker.

A person posting with the credentials of:

and


Is engaged in theft of my photographs of my web site and defamation of me
and my family. He has conducted a 2 year long campaign against me of lies,
defamation and threats. I am now committed to pursuing and silencing him
through the court system, regardless of the cost.

My name is Douglas MacDonald.
I run a number of web sites the most significant is photosbydouglas.com
and canvasphotos.com.au I am a law abiding Australian business person with
deep involvement community activities. I pay my taxes, register with all
necessary Government departments and provide a legal and valid warranty
and refund procedure in my business activities.

No one should have to contend with lies and defamatory statements from
anyone when they run a legitimate business. I've had enough of this and
now intend to silence him legally.

I offer now a NO-QUESTIONS-ASKED $500 AUD cash reward for information of
the real identity and residential address of the person using these
identities.

The money will be paid by my lawyers at Eagle Street Brisbane on
successful service of summonses on this person. The payment will be cash
and you do not need to identify yourself, just wait until your information
is verified and the court papers served, to be paid.


http://www.google.com.au/search?q=ma...es&sa=N&tab=iw

optusnet.com.au

Queensland

http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=e...Search& meta=




D-Mac March 29th 06 03:40 AM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
Mal wrote:
"D-Mac" wrote in message
...

A CASH REWARD IS OFFERED for information leading to the identity of an
Internet thief, proven liar and stalker.

A person posting with the credentials of:

and


Is engaged in theft of my photographs of my web site and defamation of me
and my family. He has conducted a 2 year long campaign against me of lies,
defamation and threats. I am now committed to pursuing and silencing him
through the court system, regardless of the cost.

My name is Douglas MacDonald.
I run a number of web sites the most significant is photosbydouglas.com
and canvasphotos.com.au I am a law abiding Australian business person with
deep involvement community activities. I pay my taxes, register with all
necessary Government departments and provide a legal and valid warranty
and refund procedure in my business activities.

No one should have to contend with lies and defamatory statements from
anyone when they run a legitimate business. I've had enough of this and
now intend to silence him legally.

I offer now a NO-QUESTIONS-ASKED $500 AUD cash reward for information of
the real identity and residential address of the person using these
identities.

The money will be paid by my lawyers at Eagle Street Brisbane on
successful service of summonses on this person. The payment will be cash
and you do not need to identify yourself, just wait until your information
is verified and the court papers served, to be paid.



http://www.google.com.au/search?q=ma...es&sa=N&tab=iw

optusnet.com.au

Queensland

http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=e...Search& meta=



So which is he? Faculty of law student (no) or;
Rugby League player (no too).

I doubt this fellow is even using his real name because when he was
posting glowing reviews about his (then) new car, he gave his location
as Port Lincoln in South Australia. This is a (relatively) small town
and I phoned every "Stevens" (Which was the name he used at that time)on
the Electoral roll and none had any knowledge of a Chrlz or Charles
Stevens who owned a daiwoo motor car.

The youth and employment centre he started stalking me from has no
knowledge of anyone by his name although they did give up some
information about the work station being used at the time.

Last year he moved to Brisbane claiming he was associated with the
Elders of The Aboriginal communities within close range of Cleveland
after I produced my commercial permits for restricted areas. He had
posted messages that I was a liar and didn't have them. There was also
mention of my access to tribal lands. That's when he said he was closely
associated with the community which it seems now was just another
figment of his imagination because no one in the community know him by
those names.

No Elder at Logan, Darra or Ipswich confessed to any knowledge of anyone
arriving from South Australia in a green Daiwoo motor car or anyone
arriving from Port Lincoln in the recent past.

He has been very careful to conceal his name and address while posting
totally false lies and defamation with relatively believable names. The
cost of a discovery warrant against Optus is a lot more than $500 and
they are know to be totally uncooperative in these matters but if no one
comes up with any real information soon, I'll pay that and whatever else
it costs to track the swine down.

Jeus March 29th 06 06:51 AM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 02:40:59 +0000, D-Mac proclaimed:

Mal wrote:


snip

So which is he? Faculty of law student (no) or; Rugby League player (no
too).

I doubt this fellow is even using his real name because when he was
posting glowing reviews about his (then) new car, he gave his location as
Port Lincoln in South Australia. This is a (relatively) small town and I
phoned every "Stevens" (Which was the name he used at that time)on the
Electoral roll and none had any knowledge of a Chrlz or Charles Stevens
who owned a daiwoo motor car.

The youth and employment centre he started stalking me from has no
knowledge of anyone by his name although they did give up some information
about the work station being used at the time.

Last year he moved to Brisbane claiming he was associated with the Elders
of The Aboriginal communities within close range of Cleveland after I
produced my commercial permits for restricted areas. He had posted
messages that I was a liar and didn't have them. There was also mention of
my access to tribal lands. That's when he said he was closely associated
with the community which it seems now was just another figment of his
imagination because no one in the community know him by those names.

No Elder at Logan, Darra or Ipswich confessed to any knowledge of anyone
arriving from South Australia in a green Daiwoo motor car or anyone
arriving from Port Lincoln in the recent past.

He has been very careful to conceal his name and address while posting
totally false lies and defamation with relatively believable names. The
cost of a discovery warrant against Optus is a lot more than $500 and they
are know to be totally uncooperative in these matters but if no one comes
up with any real information soon, I'll pay that and whatever else it
costs to track the swine down.


Just be careful you're not being misled right from the start.

If this person has an axe to grind with you /and/ they have half a brain,
combined with a basic understanding of how the internet works, they would
have set up a misleading identity, with what appears to be very
convincing tid-bits of information scattered here and there all over
the net that'll throw you way off their scent.

Despite what many people think, it's very possible to be literally
untraceable on the net these days (especially these days)regardless of
how much money, determination and legal backing you might have at your
disposal.
And until there is an entirely new version of the Internet
itself (which will happen eventually due to the current version being
uncontrollable - and big business/govt don't like that) it will remain
that way.

Of course, there's no accounting for carelessness or stupidity, and maybe
your nemesis fits one or both of these categories?

At this stage I don't know if you really have a legitimate complaint...
no offence, its just that I really don't know you or know exactly what
this other person has done to you - but what other info do you have on
this person - what names have they been posting under, any significant
posts made, etc?
I might find the time to have a sniff around and maybe I'll spot something
significant... My own interest in this is partially curiosity and partly
that I simply enjoy these kind of exercises. I or somebody else might just
come across some crucial info for you... good luck in your quest.

--
/J/
Cut the crap to email me...
Webcam: http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/glen1070/x.jpg


Pete D March 29th 06 09:13 AM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
And seriously who would admit to buying a new Daewoo?

"Jeus" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 02:40:59 +0000, D-Mac proclaimed:

Mal wrote:


snip

So which is he? Faculty of law student (no) or; Rugby League player (no
too).

I doubt this fellow is even using his real name because when he was
posting glowing reviews about his (then) new car, he gave his location as
Port Lincoln in South Australia. This is a (relatively) small town and I
phoned every "Stevens" (Which was the name he used at that time)on the
Electoral roll and none had any knowledge of a Chrlz or Charles Stevens
who owned a daiwoo motor car.

The youth and employment centre he started stalking me from has no
knowledge of anyone by his name although they did give up some
information
about the work station being used at the time.

Last year he moved to Brisbane claiming he was associated with the Elders
of The Aboriginal communities within close range of Cleveland after I
produced my commercial permits for restricted areas. He had posted
messages that I was a liar and didn't have them. There was also mention
of
my access to tribal lands. That's when he said he was closely associated
with the community which it seems now was just another figment of his
imagination because no one in the community know him by those names.

No Elder at Logan, Darra or Ipswich confessed to any knowledge of anyone
arriving from South Australia in a green Daiwoo motor car or anyone
arriving from Port Lincoln in the recent past.

He has been very careful to conceal his name and address while posting
totally false lies and defamation with relatively believable names. The
cost of a discovery warrant against Optus is a lot more than $500 and
they
are know to be totally uncooperative in these matters but if no one comes
up with any real information soon, I'll pay that and whatever else it
costs to track the swine down.


Just be careful you're not being misled right from the start.

If this person has an axe to grind with you /and/ they have half a brain,
combined with a basic understanding of how the internet works, they would
have set up a misleading identity, with what appears to be very
convincing tid-bits of information scattered here and there all over
the net that'll throw you way off their scent.

Despite what many people think, it's very possible to be literally
untraceable on the net these days (especially these days)regardless of
how much money, determination and legal backing you might have at your
disposal.
And until there is an entirely new version of the Internet
itself (which will happen eventually due to the current version being
uncontrollable - and big business/govt don't like that) it will remain
that way.

Of course, there's no accounting for carelessness or stupidity, and maybe
your nemesis fits one or both of these categories?

At this stage I don't know if you really have a legitimate complaint...
no offence, its just that I really don't know you or know exactly what
this other person has done to you - but what other info do you have on
this person - what names have they been posting under, any significant
posts made, etc?
I might find the time to have a sniff around and maybe I'll spot something
significant... My own interest in this is partially curiosity and partly
that I simply enjoy these kind of exercises. I or somebody else might just
come across some crucial info for you... good luck in your quest.

--
/J/
Cut the crap to email me...
Webcam: http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/glen1070/x.jpg




[email protected] March 29th 06 01:09 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
Offtopic, but the whole thread is, so who cares?

And seriously who would admit to buying a new Daewoo?


I resemble that statement!!!

For the record, I decided that just once in my life I'd buy a new car
(I'm not a new car sort of person..) I wanted to get a compact, and I
drove all the contenders... The Lanos impressed me, and was the only
one I was comfortable in (I have long legs - the Hyundai, Impresza and
Mirage sucked as far as seating comfort).

Plus it had a three year warranty, and I knew GM were taking over
Daewoo, so what the heck, I thought. In over three years, I drove the
thing into the ground, did over 140,000km and had not a single spot of
trouble with it, it was still humming sweetly when I sold it (to move
interstate). It was amazingly comfortable on long trips, cruised very
happily and safely at a genuine (gps tested) 130 kph and could still
overtake (grin).. (er not that I would ever actually travel that fast,
of course, officer..) I used it to travel from Port Lincoln to Surfers
and back (about 5400km IIRC) *six* times, so i got to know it pretty
well... (O:

Plus, with the addition of a small sub, tweeters and JVC sound system
(less than $700 all up), it was an extra pleasant experience...

So don't be too quick to knock the Woo. I don't have it now, but I
miss it and do not regret my purchase at all..

Now, what was this post about? Oh yes. See my reply below..


[email protected] March 29th 06 01:09 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
(Offtopic, like this entire posting. Just defending my name. I shall
not respond beyond this, except to Mr MacDonald's solicitors.(grin))

Firstly, it seems that Douglas is not quite getting the response he
wished. He is now recognised for the type of person he is.

A CASH REWARD IS OFFERED for information leading to the identity of an
Internet image thief, proven liar and stalker.


And good luck getting your money. Anyone who bites will have as much
hope as people like Avery, Annika, Rusty and others had, of ever
getting Douglas' free samples. And of course he has performed this
stunt before - a quick search will reveal very similar postings in the
past.

A person posting with the credentials of: and
Is engaged in theft of my photographs off my web site


'Theft' is stealing. I haven't stolen anything. Let me explain this
in words of less than two syl-lab-les.

1. Douglas posted images and text on the In-ter-net.
2. Douglas drew at-ten-tion to them in these groups.
3. People cri-tic-ised his images and in-fer-en-ces.
4. He (cow-ard-ly) withdrew the images and text.
5. People like me reposted the images and text so Douglas can't get
away with it.

That's not stealing. In fact, just about anyone with even a smattering
of legal training will look at that and laugh. 'Fair use', they will
chuckle.

and defamation of me and my family.


Nope. I've called him a liar, because he does lie. I've called him a
fraud, because he has used fraudulent means to try to promote his
business (although it seems his business is almost completely
non-existent - he certainly has no 'Techno Aussie Digital Print Centre'
franchise that he claimed in the laughable 'Graham Hunt' episode). The
difference here is that anyone can look up all those incidents. But
can Douglas post a nice clear simple link to where *I* have lied?
Defamation only applies if one utters untruths.

And of course I've called him a sockpuppet, because he has used many
identities (over 40 at last count) to pretend to be different people of
the same view, and to support his own posts.

I am now committed to pursuing and silencing him through the court
system, regardless of the cost.


So why doesn't he get off his arse and do it? What was this post
supposed to achieve? Make me tremble in my boots? Not gonna happen.

My name is Douglas MacDonald.
I run a number of web sites the most significant is photosbydouglas.com


Isn't that the one he pulled down and said he had completely abandoned
- along with digital photography - only a few months back? (refer to
"Digicams With MF Film Quality" in rec.photo.digital, which contains
more examples of his pulled webpages and ridiculous claims), and also
"Return to film... True!" in rec.photo.equipment.35mm

I offer now a NO-QUESTIONS-ASKED $500 AUD cash reward for information of
the real identity and residential address of the person using these
identities.


'No questions asked'? Let's read on...

The money will be paid by my lawyers at Eagle Street Brisbane on
successful service of summonses on this person.


Oh. So there are in fact quite a few 'questions' and conditions.
Here's a simple solution - if Douglas will post the name of his
lawyer/s, I will happily identify myself to them, and forward to them
every post I've ever made about him in full context. If he has a
problem with that (and he will!), I think we can say his bluff has now
officially been called.

The payment will be cash and you do not need to identify yourself


Hence my request. I'll give my details to an *unbiased* observer, but
I don't wish to be identified by Douglas because he is a *obsessed
borderline psychotic*. If you doubt that, from another post on this
topic, Douglas said, and I quote:

I'll find you soon enough...
Scum like you are the reason shopkeepers keep shotguns under
the counter.


Any questions, folks? That will be one of the first things I show his
lawyer...

just wait until your information is verified and the court papers served, to be paid.


But what if Douglas decides he won't proceed? (Gee, not that it would
be likely, I'm sure that any lawyer would *jump* at the chance to
represent someone like him..) But of course by then he would have my
address... Anyone else feel like giving him their address, after that
shotgun remark??

Anyway, these silly threats might work on someone with little
intelligence, and maybe Douglas thinks everyone thinks just like him.
But they ain't working on me. If he continues to post rubbish and then
withdraw it, I will continue to *repost* it for posterity, and to
ensure he doesn't get away with his ridiculous claims.

To prove that he won't stop me keeping him honest, here's another of
the Douglas classic posts, which deserves another showing:

http://www.geocities.com/chrlzs/flinders-20D

Herein Douglas tried to show how badly a Canon performs with shadow
detail. But take a careful look at the EXIF data which shows the
exposure mode he used (partial, which is similar to spot), and then
look at the histogram. Remembering, this is a sunlit beach scene, and
he effectively used spot metering off the guy's sunlit white pants,
shirt and beach sand, with no compensation...!!! Does anyone here
think the problem is the camera, or is it the photographer? I can post
more - is Douglas going to summons the Wayback Machine too? There are
many other ways to get cached data, so no-one can escape their history.
I'm happy for any of *my* work to be reposted, by the way - I'll be
flattered! And my old stuff is actually not that hard to find...

(O:

So remember - these are his *publicly posted webpages*, complete with
all copyright messages, reposted for educational purposes.

Contact me through my web sites.


Any takers yet? I hope no-one beats me to my $500.

(O:

I'm waiting for your lawyer's name, Douglas.


[email protected] March 29th 06 01:24 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 

Sam wrote:

i think hywel jenkins might be mark thomas :)


I think Sam might be Hywel Jenkins :)

--
Hywel


[email protected] March 29th 06 01:43 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
I think Sam might be Hywel Jenkins :)

Doesn't anyone want to be Douglas?

(O:

I shouldn't be flippant - I get the impression that the poor man's
sense of humour has run out completely. For me anyway.

Why *would* he get so upset about his webpages being reposted for
posterity? I'm only doing it to keep him honest, and to help out
latecomers to his famous threads. For instance, I think it is required
reading for anyone to visit the classic "Enlarged digital images with
more detail than the original" thread (yes, I'm serious, that was his
title):

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....dff1d6c6425889


Before taking Douglas too seriously, and believing all that he doth
accuseth me of, I strongly suggest readers do a little homework. Then
make up your own mind.

And to cover all his posts, you will have to search on the following
identities:

ryadia, technoaussie, auspics, big guy, ormiston, sebastian po, doug,
douglas, douglas macdonald, stool pigeon, duncan donald, an interested
bystander, one million pics, one million pictures, alan jones,
alienjones, alienjones himself, alvie, the yowie, bigpix, pix on
canvas, the administrator, pixby, henretta, joe bailey, graham hunt,
healthypcs, random user 12987, MoioM, go go dancer, maddy, huey fong,
wilder and wilder, tekoaussie, justintyme, snaps, kakadu, HPC, deciple
of EOS, child of EOS, call me any name, keep_it_simple, notsimple,
not_just_Simple, tropical treat, d-mac, wraped in canvas...

Sadly I'm NOT kidding. They (and others) are all Douglas MacDonald.


Sam March 29th 06 02:12 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
i think hywel jenkins might be mark thomas :)

www.promineo.blogspot.com

wrote in message
oups.com...

D-Mac wrote:

A CASH REWARD IS OFFERED for information leading to the identity of an
Internet thief, proven liar and stalker.


I have the information you need, but I need you to prove those
statements.


Is engaged in theft of my photographs of my web site and defamation of
me and my family. He has conducted a 2 year long campaign against me of
lies, defamation and threats. I am now committed to pursuing and
silencing him through the court system, regardless of the cost.


I very much doubt that you're really going to do "this regardless of
the cost". Do you really have 100,000 to waste on this? I doubt it.
Which jurisdiction are you intending to sue under?


My name is Douglas MacDonald.
I run a number of web sites the most significant is photosbydouglas.com
and canvasphotos.com.au I am a law abiding Australian business person
with deep involvement community activities. I pay my taxes, register
with all necessary Government departments and provide a legal and valid
warranty and refund procedure in my business activities.


Irrelevant.


No one should have to contend with lies and defamatory statements from
anyone when they run a legitimate business. I've had enough of this and
now intend to silence him legally.


I'll wager the people you're after a worried sick now. I know I would
be, especially as you've gone to so much trouble to find them. Usenet
is such a great place to track people down.

Douglas, give it up. You just don't have the resources to do this.
Unless you're the RIAA, that is.

--
Hywel



alx March 29th 06 03:23 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
Well that was easy to identify him. Prepare a cheque for Mark ehehe


wrote in message
oups.com...
(Offtopic, like this entire posting. Just defending my name. I shall
not respond beyond this, except to Mr MacDonald's solicitors.(grin))

Firstly, it seems that Douglas is not quite getting the response he


etc etc.



Poxy March 29th 06 03:41 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 

"D-Mac" wrote in message
...
Mal wrote:
"D-Mac" wrote in message
...

A CASH REWARD IS OFFERED for information leading to the identity of an
Internet thief, proven liar and stalker.

A person posting with the credentials of:

and


Is engaged in theft of my photographs of my web site and defamation of

me
and my family. He has conducted a 2 year long campaign against me of

lies,
defamation and threats. I am now committed to pursuing and silencing him
through the court system, regardless of the cost.

My name is Douglas MacDonald.
I run a number of web sites the most significant is photosbydouglas.com
and canvasphotos.com.au I am a law abiding Australian business person

with
deep involvement community activities. I pay my taxes, register with all
necessary Government departments and provide a legal and valid warranty
and refund procedure in my business activities.

No one should have to contend with lies and defamatory statements from
anyone when they run a legitimate business. I've had enough of this and
now intend to silence him legally.

I offer now a NO-QUESTIONS-ASKED $500 AUD cash reward for information of
the real identity and residential address of the person using these
identities.

The money will be paid by my lawyers at Eagle Street Brisbane on
successful service of summonses on this person. The payment will be cash
and you do not need to identify yourself, just wait until your

information
is verified and the court papers served, to be paid.




http://www.google.com.au/search?q=ma...es&sa=N&tab=iw

optusnet.com.au

Queensland


http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=e...Search& meta=



So which is he? Faculty of law student (no) or;
Rugby League player (no too).

I doubt this fellow is even using his real name because when he was
posting glowing reviews about his (then) new car, he gave his location
as Port Lincoln in South Australia. This is a (relatively) small town
and I phoned every "Stevens" (Which was the name he used at that time)on
the Electoral roll and none had any knowledge of a Chrlz or Charles
Stevens who owned a daiwoo motor car.

The youth and employment centre he started stalking me from has no
knowledge of anyone by his name although they did give up some
information about the work station being used at the time.

Last year he moved to Brisbane claiming he was associated with the
Elders of The Aboriginal communities within close range of Cleveland
after I produced my commercial permits for restricted areas. He had
posted messages that I was a liar and didn't have them. There was also
mention of my access to tribal lands. That's when he said he was closely
associated with the community which it seems now was just another
figment of his imagination because no one in the community know him by
those names.

No Elder at Logan, Darra or Ipswich confessed to any knowledge of anyone
arriving from South Australia in a green Daiwoo motor car or anyone
arriving from Port Lincoln in the recent past.

He has been very careful to conceal his name and address while posting
totally false lies and defamation with relatively believable names. The
cost of a discovery warrant against Optus is a lot more than $500 and
they are know to be totally uncooperative in these matters but if no one
comes up with any real information soon, I'll pay that and whatever else
it costs to track the swine down.


I'm surprised you balked at paying the legal costs for a warrant against
Optus - surely your reputation is far more valuable than what, for you,
would surely be a paltry sum in order to exact retribution for these
scurrulous attacks on your good name?

If the legal profession can't smoke out the blighter, might I suggest you
engage a private detective of skill, discretion and repute to track down
this scoundrel and occupy yourself more productively in building your
fortune and sharing your expertise and knowledge.

Let us hear only of the inspired, impartial wisdom you generously impart to
these forums, and leave the chasing of ingrates to those professionaly
predisposed to the task.










hyperoglyphe March 29th 06 04:08 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 

wrote in message
oups.com...
I think Sam might be Hywel Jenkins :)


Doesn't anyone want to be Douglas?

(O:

I shouldn't be flippant - I get the impression that the poor man's
sense of humour has run out completely. For me anyway.

Why *would* he get so upset about his webpages being reposted for
posterity? I'm only doing it to keep him honest, and to help out
latecomers to his famous threads. For instance, I think it is required
reading for anyone to visit the classic "Enlarged digital images with
more detail than the original" thread (yes, I'm serious, that was his
title):

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....dff1d6c6425889


Before taking Douglas too seriously, and believing all that he doth
accuseth me of, I strongly suggest readers do a little homework. Then
make up your own mind.

And to cover all his posts, you will have to search on the following
identities:

ryadia, technoaussie, auspics, big guy, ormiston, sebastian po, doug,
douglas, douglas macdonald, stool pigeon, duncan donald, an interested
bystander, one million pics, one million pictures, alan jones,
alienjones, alienjones himself, alvie, the yowie, bigpix, pix on
canvas, the administrator, pixby, henretta, joe bailey, graham hunt,
healthypcs, random user 12987, MoioM, go go dancer, maddy, huey fong,
wilder and wilder, tekoaussie, justintyme, snaps, kakadu, HPC, deciple
of EOS, child of EOS, call me any name, keep_it_simple, notsimple,
not_just_Simple, tropical treat, d-mac, wraped in canvas...

Sadly I'm NOT kidding. They (and others) are all Douglas MacDonald.


If that sock collection is all true I find it astounding he recently had the
gall to accuse me of being a sock.

Dave



D-Mac March 29th 06 09:11 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
Poxy wrote:
"D-Mac" wrote in message
...

Mal wrote:

"D-Mac" wrote in message
...


A CASH REWARD IS OFFERED for information leading to the identity of an
Internet thief, proven liar and stalker.

A person posting with the credentials of:

and


Is engaged in theft of my photographs of my web site and defamation of


me

and my family. He has conducted a 2 year long campaign against me of


lies,

defamation and threats. I am now committed to pursuing and silencing him
through the court system, regardless of the cost.

My name is Douglas MacDonald.
I run a number of web sites the most significant is photosbydouglas.com
and canvasphotos.com.au I am a law abiding Australian business person


with

deep involvement community activities. I pay my taxes, register with all
necessary Government departments and provide a legal and valid warranty
and refund procedure in my business activities.

No one should have to contend with lies and defamatory statements from
anyone when they run a legitimate business. I've had enough of this and
now intend to silence him legally.

I offer now a NO-QUESTIONS-ASKED $500 AUD cash reward for information of
the real identity and residential address of the person using these
identities.

The money will be paid by my lawyers at Eagle Street Brisbane on
successful service of summonses on this person. The payment will be cash
and you do not need to identify yourself, just wait until your


information

is verified and the court papers served, to be paid.



http://www.google.com.au/search?q=ma...es&sa=N&tab=iw

optusnet.com.au

Queensland



http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=e...Search& meta=



So which is he? Faculty of law student (no) or;
Rugby League player (no too).

I doubt this fellow is even using his real name because when he was
posting glowing reviews about his (then) new car, he gave his location
as Port Lincoln in South Australia. This is a (relatively) small town
and I phoned every "Stevens" (Which was the name he used at that time)on
the Electoral roll and none had any knowledge of a Chrlz or Charles
Stevens who owned a daiwoo motor car.

The youth and employment centre he started stalking me from has no
knowledge of anyone by his name although they did give up some
information about the work station being used at the time.

Last year he moved to Brisbane claiming he was associated with the
Elders of The Aboriginal communities within close range of Cleveland
after I produced my commercial permits for restricted areas. He had
posted messages that I was a liar and didn't have them. There was also
mention of my access to tribal lands. That's when he said he was closely
associated with the community which it seems now was just another
figment of his imagination because no one in the community know him by
those names.

No Elder at Logan, Darra or Ipswich confessed to any knowledge of anyone
arriving from South Australia in a green Daiwoo motor car or anyone
arriving from Port Lincoln in the recent past.

He has been very careful to conceal his name and address while posting
totally false lies and defamation with relatively believable names. The
cost of a discovery warrant against Optus is a lot more than $500 and
they are know to be totally uncooperative in these matters but if no one
comes up with any real information soon, I'll pay that and whatever else
it costs to track the swine down.



I'm surprised you balked at paying the legal costs for a warrant against
Optus - surely your reputation is far more valuable than what, for you,
would surely be a paltry sum in order to exact retribution for these
scurrulous attacks on your good name?

If the legal profession can't smoke out the blighter, might I suggest you
engage a private detective of skill, discretion and repute to track down
this scoundrel and occupy yourself more productively in building your
fortune and sharing your expertise and knowledge.

Let us hear only of the inspired, impartial wisdom you generously impart to
these forums, and leave the chasing of ingrates to those professionaly
predisposed to the task.



Good advise Poxy.
Today, I'll take it.

Scott W March 29th 06 09:15 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
Poxy wrote:
"D-Mac" wrote in message
...
Mal wrote:
"D-Mac" wrote in message
...

A CASH REWARD IS OFFERED for information leading to the identity of an
Internet thief, proven liar and stalker.

A person posting with the credentials of:

and


Is engaged in theft of my photographs of my web site and defamation of

me
and my family. He has conducted a 2 year long campaign against me of

lies,
defamation and threats. I am now committed to pursuing and silencing him
through the court system, regardless of the cost.

My name is Douglas MacDonald.
I run a number of web sites the most significant is photosbydouglas.com
and canvasphotos.com.au I am a law abiding Australian business person

with
deep involvement community activities. I pay my taxes, register with all
necessary Government departments and provide a legal and valid warranty
and refund procedure in my business activities.

No one should have to contend with lies and defamatory statements from
anyone when they run a legitimate business. I've had enough of this and
now intend to silence him legally.

I offer now a NO-QUESTIONS-ASKED $500 AUD cash reward for information of
the real identity and residential address of the person using these
identities.

The money will be paid by my lawyers at Eagle Street Brisbane on
successful service of summonses on this person. The payment will be cash
and you do not need to identify yourself, just wait until your

information
is verified and the court papers served, to be paid.



http://www.google.com.au/search?q=ma...es&sa=N&tab=iw

optusnet.com.au

Queensland


http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=e...Search& meta=



So which is he? Faculty of law student (no) or;
Rugby League player (no too).

I doubt this fellow is even using his real name because when he was
posting glowing reviews about his (then) new car, he gave his location
as Port Lincoln in South Australia. This is a (relatively) small town
and I phoned every "Stevens" (Which was the name he used at that time)on
the Electoral roll and none had any knowledge of a Chrlz or Charles
Stevens who owned a daiwoo motor car.

The youth and employment centre he started stalking me from has no
knowledge of anyone by his name although they did give up some
information about the work station being used at the time.

Last year he moved to Brisbane claiming he was associated with the
Elders of The Aboriginal communities within close range of Cleveland
after I produced my commercial permits for restricted areas. He had
posted messages that I was a liar and didn't have them. There was also
mention of my access to tribal lands. That's when he said he was closely
associated with the community which it seems now was just another
figment of his imagination because no one in the community know him by
those names.

No Elder at Logan, Darra or Ipswich confessed to any knowledge of anyone
arriving from South Australia in a green Daiwoo motor car or anyone
arriving from Port Lincoln in the recent past.

He has been very careful to conceal his name and address while posting
totally false lies and defamation with relatively believable names. The
cost of a discovery warrant against Optus is a lot more than $500 and
they are know to be totally uncooperative in these matters but if no one
comes up with any real information soon, I'll pay that and whatever else
it costs to track the swine down.


I'm surprised you balked at paying the legal costs for a warrant against
Optus - surely your reputation is far more valuable than what, for you,
would surely be a paltry sum in order to exact retribution for these
scurrulous attacks on your good name?

If the legal profession can't smoke out the blighter, might I suggest you
engage a private detective of skill, discretion and repute to track down
this scoundrel and occupy yourself more productively in building your
fortune and sharing your expertise and knowledge.

Let us hear only of the inspired, impartial wisdom you generously impart to
these forums, and leave the chasing of ingrates to those professionaly
predisposed to the task.


I can only assume that you are joking here, right?

Scott W


D-Mac March 29th 06 09:17 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
Scott W wrote:


It is all too true, he changes identity on about a weekly bases.
He went on a rant about digital cameras and how he was giving up on
digital and going back to film, right after changing identities and
then a few weeks later did a post about how film could never match the
quality of digital, with photos to prove it.


Scott W

I do in fact change my Internet identity on a regular basis. That's not
illegal and recommended by many in the security industry. There's a few
he missed and some which are not mine, incidentally.

Post in this as if it were a crime is just a smoke screen. I'll go the
lawyers route from here on. I'd thought someone might have know him but
he conceals his identity to all, it would seem.

D-Mac March 29th 06 09:21 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
wrote:


Hence my request. I'll give my details to an *unbiased* observer, but
I don't wish to be identified by Douglas because he is a *obsessed
borderline psychotic*. If you doubt that, from another post on this
topic, Douglas said, and I quote:



That's easy. Post your name and address. I'll have him serve the papers
on you tomorrow. No, that's not your style, is it just make a smoke
screen to try and hide your thieving slanderous activities.

Your time is coming.

Tony Polson March 29th 06 11:08 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
D-Mac wrote:


Good advise Poxy.
Today, I'll take it.



You will take your own advice? No surprise there!


(To those who cannot work it out for themselves, "Poxy" is yet another
one of Doug's many aliases.)


Tony Polson March 29th 06 11:11 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
"hyperoglyphe" wrote:

If that sock collection is all true I find it astounding he recently had the
gall to accuse me of being a sock.



He's added yet another one today - "Poxy".

Strangely appropriate? Appropriately strange!

;-)

Mike Warren March 29th 06 11:45 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
D-Mac wrote:
wrote:


Hence my request. I'll give my details to an *unbiased* observer,
but I don't wish to be identified by Douglas because he is a
*obsessed borderline psychotic*. If you doubt that, from another
post on this topic, Douglas said, and I quote:



That's easy. Post your name and address. I'll have him serve the
papers on you tomorrow. No, that's not your style, is it just make a
smoke screen to try and hide your thieving slanderous activities.

Your time is coming.


Doug,

Why don't you just post the name of your lawyers as he requested?
That will do no harm to anyone and may even help you.

-Mike



Poxy March 30th 06 12:44 AM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
Scott W wrote:
Poxy wrote:
"D-Mac" wrote in message
...
Mal wrote:
"D-Mac" wrote in message
...

A CASH REWARD IS OFFERED for information leading to the identity
of an Internet thief, proven liar and stalker.

A person posting with the credentials of:

and


Is engaged in theft of my photographs of my web site and
defamation of me and my family. He has conducted a 2 year long
campaign against me of lies, defamation and threats. I am now
committed to pursuing and silencing him through the court system,
regardless of the cost.

My name is Douglas MacDonald.
I run a number of web sites the most significant is
photosbydouglas.com and canvasphotos.com.au I am a law abiding
Australian business person with deep involvement community
activities. I pay my taxes, register with all necessary
Government departments and provide a legal and valid warranty and
refund procedure in my business activities.

No one should have to contend with lies and defamatory statements
from anyone when they run a legitimate business. I've had enough
of this and now intend to silence him legally.

I offer now a NO-QUESTIONS-ASKED $500 AUD cash reward for
information of the real identity and residential address of the
person using these identities.

The money will be paid by my lawyers at Eagle Street Brisbane on
successful service of summonses on this person. The payment will
be cash and you do not need to identify yourself, just wait until
your information is verified and the court papers served, to be
paid.




http://www.google.com.au/search?q=ma...es&sa=N&tab=iw

optusnet.com.au

Queensland



http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=e...Search& meta=



So which is he? Faculty of law student (no) or;
Rugby League player (no too).

I doubt this fellow is even using his real name because when he was
posting glowing reviews about his (then) new car, he gave his
location as Port Lincoln in South Australia. This is a (relatively)
small town and I phoned every "Stevens" (Which was the name he used
at that time)on the Electoral roll and none had any knowledge of a
Chrlz or Charles Stevens who owned a daiwoo motor car.

The youth and employment centre he started stalking me from has no
knowledge of anyone by his name although they did give up some
information about the work station being used at the time.

Last year he moved to Brisbane claiming he was associated with the
Elders of The Aboriginal communities within close range of Cleveland
after I produced my commercial permits for restricted areas. He had
posted messages that I was a liar and didn't have them. There was
also mention of my access to tribal lands. That's when he said he
was closely associated with the community which it seems now was
just another figment of his imagination because no one in the
community know him by those names.

No Elder at Logan, Darra or Ipswich confessed to any knowledge of
anyone arriving from South Australia in a green Daiwoo motor car or
anyone arriving from Port Lincoln in the recent past.

He has been very careful to conceal his name and address while
posting totally false lies and defamation with relatively
believable names. The cost of a discovery warrant against Optus is
a lot more than $500 and they are know to be totally uncooperative
in these matters but if no one comes up with any real information
soon, I'll pay that and whatever else it costs to track the swine
down.


I'm surprised you balked at paying the legal costs for a warrant
against Optus - surely your reputation is far more valuable than
what, for you, would surely be a paltry sum in order to exact
retribution for these scurrulous attacks on your good name?

If the legal profession can't smoke out the blighter, might I
suggest you engage a private detective of skill, discretion and
repute to track down this scoundrel and occupy yourself more
productively in building your fortune and sharing your expertise and
knowledge.

Let us hear only of the inspired, impartial wisdom you generously
impart to these forums, and leave the chasing of ingrates to those
professionaly predisposed to the task.


I can only assume that you are joking here, right?


I think the correct expression is: "well, duh".








Poxy March 30th 06 12:48 AM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
Tony Polson wrote:
D-Mac wrote:


Good advise Poxy.
Today, I'll take it.



You will take your own advice? No surprise there!


(To those who cannot work it out for themselves, "Poxy" is yet another
one of Doug's many aliases.)


Let me guess, you don't find TV programs funny unless there's a laugh track?
And you can't identify sarcasm in a post unless there's a smiley face? Am I
right?





Poxy March 30th 06 12:50 AM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
D-Mac wrote:
Poxy wrote:
"D-Mac" wrote in message
...

Mal wrote:

"D-Mac" wrote in message
...


A CASH REWARD IS OFFERED for information leading to the identity
of an Internet thief, proven liar and stalker.

A person posting with the credentials of:

and


Is engaged in theft of my photographs of my web site and
defamation of


me

and my family. He has conducted a 2 year long campaign against me
of


lies,

defamation and threats. I am now committed to pursuing and
silencing him through the court system, regardless of the cost.

My name is Douglas MacDonald.
I run a number of web sites the most significant is
photosbydouglas.com and canvasphotos.com.au I am a law abiding
Australian business person


with

deep involvement community activities. I pay my taxes, register
with all necessary Government departments and provide a legal and
valid warranty and refund procedure in my business activities.

No one should have to contend with lies and defamatory statements
from anyone when they run a legitimate business. I've had enough
of this and now intend to silence him legally.

I offer now a NO-QUESTIONS-ASKED $500 AUD cash reward for
information of the real identity and residential address of the
person using these identities.

The money will be paid by my lawyers at Eagle Street Brisbane on
successful service of summonses on this person. The payment will
be cash and you do not need to identify yourself, just wait until
your


information

is verified and the court papers served, to be paid.




http://www.google.com.au/search?q=ma...es&sa=N&tab=iw

optusnet.com.au

Queensland




http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=e...Search& meta=



So which is he? Faculty of law student (no) or;
Rugby League player (no too).

I doubt this fellow is even using his real name because when he was
posting glowing reviews about his (then) new car, he gave his
location as Port Lincoln in South Australia. This is a (relatively)
small town and I phoned every "Stevens" (Which was the name he used
at that time)on the Electoral roll and none had any knowledge of a
Chrlz or Charles Stevens who owned a daiwoo motor car.

The youth and employment centre he started stalking me from has no
knowledge of anyone by his name although they did give up some
information about the work station being used at the time.

Last year he moved to Brisbane claiming he was associated with the
Elders of The Aboriginal communities within close range of Cleveland
after I produced my commercial permits for restricted areas. He had
posted messages that I was a liar and didn't have them. There was
also mention of my access to tribal lands. That's when he said he
was closely associated with the community which it seems now was
just another figment of his imagination because no one in the
community know him by those names.

No Elder at Logan, Darra or Ipswich confessed to any knowledge of
anyone arriving from South Australia in a green Daiwoo motor car or
anyone arriving from Port Lincoln in the recent past.

He has been very careful to conceal his name and address while
posting totally false lies and defamation with relatively
believable names. The cost of a discovery warrant against Optus is
a lot more than $500 and they are know to be totally uncooperative
in these matters but if no one comes up with any real information
soon, I'll pay that and whatever else it costs to track the swine
down.



I'm surprised you balked at paying the legal costs for a warrant
against Optus - surely your reputation is far more valuable than
what, for you, would surely be a paltry sum in order to exact
retribution for these scurrulous attacks on your good name?

If the legal profession can't smoke out the blighter, might I
suggest you engage a private detective of skill, discretion and
repute to track down this scoundrel and occupy yourself more
productively in building your fortune and sharing your expertise and
knowledge.

Let us hear only of the inspired, impartial wisdom you generously
impart to these forums, and leave the chasing of ingrates to those
professionaly predisposed to the task.



Good advise Poxy.
Today, I'll take it.


Good for you!





Bob Harrington March 30th 06 04:13 AM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
D-Mac wrote in news:[email protected]
server.bigpond.net.au:

Scott W wrote:


It is all too true, he changes identity on about a weekly bases.
He went on a rant about digital cameras and how he was giving up on
digital and going back to film, right after changing identities and
then a few weeks later did a post about how film could never match the
quality of digital, with photos to prove it.


Scott W

I do in fact change my Internet identity on a regular basis. That's not
illegal and recommended by many in the security industry. There's a few
he missed and some which are not mine, incidentally.

Post in this as if it were a crime is just a smoke screen. I'll go the
lawyers route from here on. I'd thought someone might have know him but
he conceals his identity to all, it would seem.


Do you deny you threatened Douglas with violence, implied or otherwise?


[email protected] March 30th 06 12:32 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
Off topic. Please skip this post unless you enjoy playing childish
games with Douglas, or watching them unfold.

I'll have him serve the papers on you tomorrow.
Your time is coming.


Yep, I knew it. He won't do the one simple thing that will guarantee a
result. Like I said - bluff called, Douglas. You don't even have a
pair of deuces in that crappy poker hand.

As Mike and others have said, what possible reason could you have for
not namimg your lawyers? And you don't even have to name the actual
lawyer, just his/her firm will do, I can wander down at lunchtime
tomorrow and I'll go and sort it out for you. I GUARANTEE that if you
name your lawyers, I will go and talk to them and show them everything
that has transpired. I can't be fairer than that.

Why does that process scare you so much? Don't you like it when people
stand up to you? (O:

And while we are at it, what possible reason do you have for not
posting *examples* of my 'defamation', my 'slander', my 'threats', my
'lies'? You keep endlessly alleging these misdemeanours, yet can never
actually POST even one. Not even ONE?

After all, I and others have posted plenty of examples to show exactly
the reverse.

So what have you achieved with this silly post, Mr MacDonald? Have a
reflective look back at all the contributors to these threads. Then
note exactly how many supporters you got.

That would be... er... one. Poxy. Oh sorry, that's *you*. You're
batting zero.

So, to sumarise:

I'm still posting.
I'm not scared of you.
Your 'withdrawn' webpages are still up.
(where *did* those takedown orders go? Or was that a falsehood?)
And nobody has given you my address, despite at least two people here
(not including me (O;) knowing it.

In fact *nothing* you have said would happen, has.

You bore me now. I'm off to take some photos around town - it's a
lovely night!

I'll leave your webpages and images up, including copyright notices
(grin) for a week or two. But then I'll repost them if anyone asks, or
if they are needed - ie if you start lying and making stupid claims
again.

So whenever you pop up with more bull**** - under whatever nom-de-plume
you come up with - we'll be here. Clearly there is now not only me,
but plenty of others who will keep you honest.

Thanks for *your* help in ensuring that, with this lame post,
Douglas... Enjoy your fame.

By the way, to show there is never anything new under the sun, persons
who are interested in Mr MacDonald and his habits might also like to
peruse these items from his checkered past:

"Slander from Google" (author - Ryadia (Douglas MacDonald))
http://groups.google.com.au/group/re...705c56960cae9/

"$500 REWARD FOR IDENTITY OF TROLL" (author - anonymous?/Ryadia)
http://groups.google.com.au/group/re...619209406431e/

"CASH REWARD for George Preddy - $500" (sadly
http://www.technoaussie.com/ no longer has the Preddy reward posted,
but of course, it is Douglas *again*..)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.p...374e0e90d1726/

(In case you are wondering, his targets on those occasions were
demonstrably *not* me.. I'm just the latest fad.. Wonder who will be
next?)

Strangely, no-one seems to have *ever* taken up his offers, nor has
anyone seen any legal action.. (O:


Tony Polson March 30th 06 06:40 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
wrote:

As Mike and others have said, what possible reason could you have for
not namimg your lawyers? And you don't even have to name the actual
lawyer, just his/her firm will do, I can wander down at lunchtime
tomorrow and I'll go and sort it out for you. I GUARANTEE that if you
name your lawyers, I will go and talk to them and show them everything
that has transpired. I can't be fairer than that.

Why does that process scare you so much?




Because there is *no firm of lawyers* doing what Dougie has claimed.

Dougie's "lawyers", just like his "private investigators", and his
ability to add detail to images that wasn't there before, are all just
figments of his deranged imagination.

Well done, Mark, you called his bluff. For that's all it is, a bluff.

;-)

MMnospam March 30th 06 11:27 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
wrote in message
oups.com...
Off topic. Please skip this post unless you enjoy playing childish
games with Douglas, or watching them unfold.


Threads involving Douglas always have great entertainment value.




Sam March 31st 06 04:29 AM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
this has to be the funniest thread i have read for a long long time. Well i
think we should solve the matter right here in the forum where it all
started, both parties state their case, whch they have and the decision will
be made by other user, according to the number of votes. Doug voting for
your self with fake names automatically gets you disqualified.

so my vote goes for mark, who presented his case, without being deceitful
and backed up everything he said with proof and links.
mark, i suggest you dont give your details

www.promineo.blogspot.com


"MMnospam" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
oups.com...
Off topic. Please skip this post unless you enjoy playing childish
games with Douglas, or watching them unfold.


Threads involving Douglas always have great entertainment value.






Poxy March 31st 06 05:10 AM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
Sam wrote:
this has to be the funniest thread i have read for a long long time.
Well i think we should solve the matter right here in the forum where
it all started, both parties state their case, whch they have and the
decision will be made by other user, according to the number of
votes. Doug voting for your self with fake names automatically gets
you disqualified.

so my vote goes for mark, who presented his case, without being
deceitful and backed up everything he said with proof and links.
mark, i suggest you dont give your details

www.promineo.blogspot.com


You can't declare this thread won or lost until one of the warring parties
mentions Hitler.



"MMnospam" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
oups.com...
Off topic. Please skip this post unless you enjoy playing childish
games with Douglas, or watching them unfold.


Threads involving Douglas always have great entertainment value.




David Springthorpe March 31st 06 06:36 AM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 04:10:56 GMT, "Poxy" wrote:

You can't declare this thread won or lost until one of the warring parties
mentions Hitler.


Mention Hitler, but don't mention the war.....oh, hang on.....

Poxy March 31st 06 06:58 AM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
Pete D wrote:
You can't declare this thread won or lost until one of the warring
parties mentions Hitler.


You just did so you lose.


I didn't think I was a warring party tho - I thought this was handbags at
twenty paces between Mark somebody and someone called "D-Dog" or something
who may or may not have a lawyer and/or $500.

Of course, since I'm arguing with you now, I need to avoid mentioning it. Oh
the conflict!




Pete D March 31st 06 07:39 AM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 



You can't declare this thread won or lost until one of the warring parties
mentions Hitler.


You just did so you lose.



Pete D March 31st 06 08:39 AM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 

"Poxy" wrote in message
...
Pete D wrote:
You can't declare this thread won or lost until one of the warring
parties mentions Hitler.


You just did so you lose.


I didn't think I was a warring party tho - I thought this was handbags at
twenty paces between Mark somebody and someone called "D-Dog" or something
who may or may not have a lawyer and/or $500.

Of course, since I'm arguing with you now, I need to avoid mentioning it.
Oh
the conflict!



Get over it Doug!



Poxy March 31st 06 09:08 AM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
Pete D wrote:
"Poxy" wrote in message
...
Pete D wrote:
You can't declare this thread won or lost until one of the warring
parties mentions Hitler.

You just did so you lose.


I didn't think I was a warring party tho - I thought this was
handbags at twenty paces between Mark somebody and someone called
"D-Dog" or something who may or may not have a lawyer and/or $500.

Of course, since I'm arguing with you now, I need to avoid
mentioning it. Oh
the conflict!



Get over it Doug!


Nazi.




Matt March 31st 06 12:11 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 

"Poxy" wrote in message
...
Pete D wrote:
"Poxy" wrote in message
...
Pete D wrote:
You can't declare this thread won or lost until one of the warring
parties mentions Hitler.

You just did so you lose.

I didn't think I was a warring party tho - I thought this was
handbags at twenty paces between Mark somebody and someone called
"D-Dog" or something who may or may not have a lawyer and/or $500.

Of course, since I'm arguing with you now, I need to avoid
mentioning it. Oh
the conflict!



Get over it Doug!


Nazi.


Good one... not.
Get over it, take your toys and go home to your fantasy land.
Why be an oxygen burlgar all your life!



Poxy March 31st 06 12:54 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
Matt wrote:
"Poxy" wrote in message
...
Pete D wrote:
"Poxy" wrote in message
...
Pete D wrote:
You can't declare this thread won or lost until one of the
warring parties mentions Hitler.

You just did so you lose.

I didn't think I was a warring party tho - I thought this was
handbags at twenty paces between Mark somebody and someone called
"D-Dog" or something who may or may not have a lawyer and/or $500.

Of course, since I'm arguing with you now, I need to avoid
mentioning it. Oh
the conflict!



Get over it Doug!


Nazi.


Good one... not.
Get over it, take your toys and go home to your fantasy land.
Why be an oxygen burlgar all your life!


Sorry Doug.





Patrick L April 1st 06 09:08 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
After reading Doug's and Mark's posts, I can only conclude, based on the
information presented, I vote that Mark is the cool guy, and Doug is,
well, shall we say, exhibiting some foam around the mouth?

Patrick



[email protected] April 2nd 06 01:28 AM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 
I vote that Mark is the cool guy

Hehe! You can be my best fwiend, Patwick!

Thanks, to my supporters one and all! I think it was all just an early
April Fools joke, personally.

(There you go, Doug, I've given you an *out*, if you want it..)


Pete D April 2nd 06 08:26 AM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 

"Poxy" wrote in message
...
Matt wrote:
"Poxy" wrote in message
...
Pete D wrote:
"Poxy" wrote in message
...
Pete D wrote:
You can't declare this thread won or lost until one of the
warring parties mentions Hitler.

You just did so you lose.

I didn't think I was a warring party tho - I thought this was
handbags at twenty paces between Mark somebody and someone called
"D-Dog" or something who may or may not have a lawyer and/or $500.

Of course, since I'm arguing with you now, I need to avoid
mentioning it. Oh
the conflict!



Get over it Doug!

Nazi.


Good one... not.
Get over it, take your toys and go home to your fantasy land.
Why be an oxygen burlgar all your life!


Sorry Doug.


Actually I think I might be around to see you in the morning you useless
arse wipe.



Poxy April 2nd 06 12:34 PM

$500 reward for identity of image thief
 

"Pete D" wrote in message
...

"Poxy" wrote in message
...
Matt wrote:
"Poxy" wrote in message
...
Pete D wrote:
"Poxy" wrote in message
...
Pete D wrote:
You can't declare this thread won or lost until one of the
warring parties mentions Hitler.

You just did so you lose.

I didn't think I was a warring party tho - I thought this was
handbags at twenty paces between Mark somebody and someone called
"D-Dog" or something who may or may not have a lawyer and/or $500.

Of course, since I'm arguing with you now, I need to avoid
mentioning it. Oh
the conflict!



Get over it Doug!

Nazi.

Good one... not.
Get over it, take your toys and go home to your fantasy land.
Why be an oxygen burlgar all your life!


Sorry Doug.


Actually I think I might be around to see you in the morning you useless
arse wipe.


More threats now Douggie? Time to give it a rest I think.









All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PhotoBanter.com