Time alters photo, makes Hillary look, well....
 

Time manipulated a photo of Hillary Clinton in order to make her look
slightly less than perfect.

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/016167.php

Geez, and I thought the media had a "liberal" bias!

Time alters photo, makes Hillary look, well....
 

Kinon O'Cann wrote:
Time manipulated a photo of Hillary Clinton in order to make her look
slightly less than perfect.

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/016167.php

Geez, and I thought the media had a "liberal" bias!


Does the paranoia extend to other areas of your life, Mulder?

Time alters photo, makes Hillary look, well....
 

Kinon O'Cann wrote:
Time manipulated a photo of Hillary Clinton in order to make her look
slightly less than perfect.

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/016167.php

Geez, and I thought the media had a "liberal" bias!

For love of Mike, she's 60. Doesn't look at all bad.

--
john mcwilliams

Time alters photo, makes Hillary look, well....
 

Kinon O'Cann wrote:
Time manipulated a photo of Hillary Clinton in order to make her look
slightly less than perfect.

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/016167.php

Geez, and I thought the media had a "liberal" bias!


Looks like they just caught her in a bad moment. The media makes a
hobby of getting such shots of Bush. Imagine if you could get a picture
of her before she gets ready to face the world.... Not all media is
biased toward liberals. Just 80%, by their own admission.

Time alters photo, makes Hillary look, well....
 

Ron Hunter wrote:
Kinon O'Cann wrote:
Time manipulated a photo of Hillary Clinton in order to make her look
slightly less than perfect.

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/016167.php

Geez, and I thought the media had a "liberal" bias!

Looks like they just caught her in a bad moment. The media makes a
hobby of getting such shots of Bush. Imagine if you could get a picture
of her before she gets ready to face the world.... Not all media is
biased toward liberals. Just 80%, by their own admission.

You're confusing "biased toward liberals" with "voted for Democrats."

In any event, it doesn't matter what reporters think, it matters what
editors think.

Time alters photo, makes Hillary look, well....
 

"Kinon O'Cann" wrote in message
news:eB1fh.2630$Et5.2388@trndny07...
Time manipulated a photo of Hillary Clinton in order to make her look
slightly less than perfect.

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/016167.php

Geez, and I thought the media had a "liberal" bias!


Her image has been doctored long before this particular photo was taken.

Ever seen pics of her from around the time Bill was just getting into
politics? In a word, Woof...

Jay Beckman
Chandler, AZ
www.pbase.com/flyingphotog

Time alters photo, makes Hillary look, well....
 

Kinon O'Cann wrote:
Time manipulated a photo of Hillary Clinton in order to make her look
slightly less than perfect.

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/016167.php

Geez, and I thought the media had a "liberal" bias!

We had the same reaction in Canada when a new coin dared to show the
Queen as a 75 year old tends to look. Sorry, but an un-soft-filtered
or non-"airbrushed" image of an important woman may not be normal, but
it is real, however unflattering.
But, want to see another photo, possibly manipulated? Take a look at
this Bush photo. How was it possible that one guys face could end up
so buried in shadow on an open stage?
Bush is on the left. If you normalize the histogram, all the detail is
there, so it was likely manipulated. Image credit is on it.
http://www.pbase.com/andersonrm/image/57989237

Time alters photo, makes Hillary look, well....
 

Rich wrote:
Kinon O'Cann wrote:
Time manipulated a photo of Hillary Clinton in order to make her look
slightly less than perfect.

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/016167.php

Geez, and I thought the media had a "liberal" bias!

We had the same reaction in Canada when a new coin dared to show the
Queen as a 75 year old tends to look. Sorry, but an un-soft-filtered
or non-"airbrushed" image of an important woman may not be normal, but
it is real, however unflattering.
But, want to see another photo, possibly manipulated? Take a look at
this Bush photo. How was it possible that one guys face could end up
so buried in shadow on an open stage?
Bush is on the left. If you normalize the histogram, all the detail is
there, so it was likely manipulated. Image credit is on it.
http://www.pbase.com/andersonrm/image/57989237


It's called 'de-emphasizing'. Photographers will often darken an area
to make another area stand out. I agree that some darkening has
probably been done. The much lighter background adds to the effect.

Time alters photo, makes Hillary look, well....
 

Jay Beckman wrote:
"Kinon O'Cann" wrote in message
news:eB1fh.2630$Et5.2388@trndny07...
Time manipulated a photo of Hillary Clinton in order to make her look
slightly less than perfect.

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/016167.php

Geez, and I thought the media had a "liberal" bias!


Her image has been doctored long before this particular photo was taken.

Ever seen pics of her from around the time Bill was just getting into
politics? In a word, Woof...

Jay Beckman
Chandler, AZ
www.pbase.com/flyingphotog

Find a pict of her at the Watergate Hearings.

She almost looks better in Time.

Time alters photo, makes Hillary look, well....
 

Hillary has always been a dog. Why do you think Bill finds his kicks
elsewhere?

"Kinon O'Cann" wrote in message
news:eB1fh.2630$Et5.2388@trndny07...
Time manipulated a photo of Hillary Clinton in order to make her look
slightly less than perfect.

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/016167.php

Geez, and I thought the media had a "liberal" bias!