Affinity Photo for iPad
I bought a new toy last week, a 10.5β iPad Pro, with 512 GB, the keyboard,
and Apple Pencil. My purpose was to update my old iPad2, and to see how well it would fit in as a replacement for a laptop for my photo travels. I already had the Adobe Mobile Apps, Lightroom Mobile, Photoshop Fix, and Photoshop Mix installed, and I had read good things regarding Affinity Photo for iPad. So, I stepped and bought it. The end result is, I am very impressed, it is so much more than the desktop edition, which I find to have an awkward workflow. It is built to integrate with the iCloud file, or any other app. For example I can save an edited image to my iCloud Drive, and/or Dropbox, and/or Lightroom Mobile, all of which can make the file accessible across all my devices, and sync with desktop/laptop LR. I can transfer image files RAW, and/or JPEG, to my iPad from my X-E2, or X-T2 via WiFi. So for any of you folks with an iPad I can highly recommend Affinity Photo for iPad. Quite frankly I believe that it is currently one of the best photo editing apps available for the iPad along with the Adobe Mobile set, and Pixelmator. https://affinity.serif.com/en-us/photo/ipad/ -- Regards, Savageduck |
Affinity Photo for iPad
In article .com,
Savageduck says... I bought a new toy last week, a 10.5? iPad Pro, with 512 GB, the keyboard, and Apple Pencil. My purpose was to update my old iPad2, and to see how well it would fit in as a replacement for a laptop for my photo travels. I already had the Adobe Mobile Apps, Lightroom Mobile, Photoshop Fix, and Photoshop Mix installed, and I had read good things regarding Affinity Photo for iPad. So, I stepped and bought it. The end result is, I am very impressed, it is so much more than the desktop edition, which I find to have an awkward workflow. It is built to integrate with the iCloud file, or any other app. For example I can save an edited image to my iCloud Drive, and/or Dropbox, and/or Lightroom Mobile, all of which can make the file accessible across all my devices, and sync with desktop/laptop LR. I can transfer image files RAW, and/or JPEG, to my iPad from my X-E2, or X-T2 via WiFi. So for any of you folks with an iPad I can highly recommend Affinity Photo for iPad. Quite frankly I believe that it is currently one of the best photo editing apps available for the iPad along with the Adobe Mobile set, and Pixelmator. https://affinity.serif.com/en-us/photo/ipad/ Just curious - why not a tablet with a 12" screen - or is that too big? Would make it easier to edit high res images. And well, a tablet for image editing, not sure how much sense that makes. Personally I need a fast processor, a screen as large/high res as possible and lots of storage (on a typical trip I take 100-150 GB of image files, and uploading these to a cloud is not really feasible). When I factor all that in, the ideal device is a notebook PC. By the way, I gave a try a while ago to the desktop version of Affinity and wasn't impressed. -- Alfred Molon Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
Affinity Photo for iPad
In article , Alfred Molon
wrote: I bought a new toy last week, a 10.5? iPad Pro, with 512 GB, the keyboard, and Apple Pencil. My purpose was to update my old iPad2, and to see how well it would fit in as a replacement for a laptop for my photo travels. I already had the Adobe Mobile Apps, Lightroom Mobile, Photoshop Fix, and Photoshop Mix installed, and I had read good things regarding Affinity Photo for iPad. So, I stepped and bought it. The end result is, I am very impressed, it is so much more than the desktop edition, which I find to have an awkward workflow. It is built to integrate with the iCloud file, or any other app. For example I can save an edited image to my iCloud Drive, and/or Dropbox, and/or Lightroom Mobile, all of which can make the file accessible across all my devices, and sync with desktop/laptop LR. I can transfer image files RAW, and/or JPEG, to my iPad from my X-E2, or X-T2 via WiFi. So for any of you folks with an iPad I can highly recommend Affinity Photo for iPad. Quite frankly I believe that it is currently one of the best photo editing apps available for the iPad along with the Adobe Mobile set, and Pixelmator. https://affinity.serif.com/en-us/photo/ipad/ Just curious - why not a tablet with a 12" screen - or is that too big? Would make it easier to edit high res images. would also make it less portable. And well, a tablet for image editing, not sure how much sense that makes. quite a bit, actually. Personally I need a fast processor, a screen as large/high res as possible and lots of storage (on a typical trip I take 100-150 GB of image files, and uploading these to a cloud is not really feasible). When I factor all that in, the ideal device is a notebook PC. for you, perhaps. keep in mind that an ipad pro tops out at 512 gb of flash storage. By the way, I gave a try a while ago to the desktop version of Affinity and wasn't impressed. that's because you tried the windows version. |
Affinity Photo for iPad
Alfred Molon:
And well, a tablet for image editing, not sure how much sense that makes. Try carrying your iMac around with you and you'll find out! Personally I need a fast processor, a screen as large/high res as possible and lots of storage (on a typical trip I take 100-150 GB of image files, and uploading these to a cloud is not really feasible). When I factor all that in, the ideal device is a notebook PC. The iPad has a fast processor. The iPad Pro display is large enough for its purpose, large enough for image processing. You don't have to upload the image files to a cloud; the software does it for you as you take the photos. It's for when you can't take your MacBook Pro. -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm |
Affinity Photo for iPad
In article , Davoud
wrote: Alfred Molon: And well, a tablet for image editing, not sure how much sense that makes. Try carrying your iMac around with you and you'll find out! the original imac had a handle... Personally I need a fast processor, a screen as large/high res as possible and lots of storage (on a typical trip I take 100-150 GB of image files, and uploading these to a cloud is not really feasible). When I factor all that in, the ideal device is a notebook PC. The iPad has a fast processor. one which benchmarks faster than most laptops. The iPad Pro display is large enough for its purpose, large enough for image processing. not only that, but the ipad pro has a wide gamut dci-p3 display, making it ideal for image processing, versus a typical non-apple laptop. You don't have to upload the image files to a cloud; the software does it for you as you take the photos. not if they're taken by a traditional camera. ipads have as much as 512 gig, plenty of space for even the most active shooters. It's for when you can't take your MacBook Pro. yep. |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On 2017-09-23 04:51, Alfred Molon wrote:
In article .com, Savageduck says... I bought a new toy last week, a 10.5? iPad Pro, with 512 GB, the keyboard, and Apple Pencil. My purpose was to update my old iPad2, and to see how well it would fit in as a replacement for a laptop for my photo travels. I already had the Adobe Mobile Apps, Lightroom Mobile, Photoshop Fix, and Photoshop Mix installed, and I had read good things regarding Affinity Photo for iPad. So, I stepped and bought it. The end result is, I am very impressed, it is so much more than the desktop edition, which I find to have an awkward workflow. It is built to integrate with the iCloud file, or any other app. For example I can save an edited image to my iCloud Drive, and/or Dropbox, and/or Lightroom Mobile, all of which can make the file accessible across all my devices, and sync with desktop/laptop LR. I can transfer image files RAW, and/or JPEG, to my iPad from my X-E2, or X-T2 via WiFi. So for any of you folks with an iPad I can highly recommend Affinity Photo for iPad. Quite frankly I believe that it is currently one of the best photo editing apps available for the iPad along with the Adobe Mobile set, and Pixelmator. https://affinity.serif.com/en-us/photo/ipad/ Just curious - why not a tablet with a 12" screen - or is that too big? Would make it easier to edit high res images. The difference between the 12 and 10.5" is not enough to matter when portability on a long trip is factored in. And well, a tablet for image editing, not sure how much sense that makes. Image editing on a tablet? Very natural interface. Personally I need a fast processor, a screen as large/high res as The ARM/GPU in the iPad's are very fast. Indeed it's a near certainty that ARM will begin to replace intel in the Apple Mac line in the coming years. possible and lots of storage (on a typical trip I take 100-150 GB of image files, and uploading these to a cloud is not really feasible). When I factor all that in, the ideal device is a notebook PC. Hmm. 512 GB is quite a lot then. No issue. No cloud needed. I can't speak about Affinity, but I can say that I will never buy an Adobe photo editing product again. |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On 9/23/2017 9:07 AM, Alan Browne wrote:
snip. Hmm.* 512 GB is quite a lot then.* No issue.* No cloud needed. When I was traveling I looked into the iPad. Because of my workflow, it didn't work for me. Remember, I use a high megapixel camera. I can't speak about Affinity, but I can say that I will never buy an Adobe photo editing product again. I recently asked Topaz if they had any tutorials that might solve an issue I was having with hair extraction using Re Mask, after they updated it. First they suggested Clarity, to increase contrast. When I pointed out that I had clarity and it did not work, they never answered my support question. I plan to bring that issue up at Photo Expo in NY, and continue looking on their forum. Meanwhile, Adobe is the best around, if only because of their available support. -- PeterN |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On 9/23/2017 8:38 AM, nospam wrote:
In article , Davoud wrote: Alfred Molon: And well, a tablet for image editing, not sure how much sense that makes. Try carrying your iMac around with you and you'll find out! the original imac had a handle... So did my old Compaq. So what is the relevance of your comment. -- PeterN |
Affinity Photo for iPad
In article , PeterN
wrote: Hmm.* 512 GB is quite a lot then.* No issue.* No cloud needed. When I was traveling I looked into the iPad. Because of my workflow, it didn't work for me. that's fine. Remember, I use a high megapixel camera. so what? |
Affinity Photo for iPad
In article , PeterN
wrote: Alfred Molon: And well, a tablet for image editing, not sure how much sense that makes. Try carrying your iMac around with you and you'll find out! the original imac had a handle... So did my old Compaq. So what is the relevance of your comment. whoooooooooooooooooooooosh. |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On Sep 23, 2017, Alfred Molon wrote
(in om): In iganews.com, Savageduck says... I bought a new toy last week, a 10.5? iPad Pro, with 512 GB, the keyboard, and Apple Pencil. My purpose was to update my old iPad2, and to see how well it would fit in as a replacement for a laptop for my photo travels. I already had the Adobe Mobile Apps, Lightroom Mobile, Photoshop Fix, and Photoshop Mix installed, and I had read good things regarding Affinity Photo for iPad. So, I stepped and bought it. The end result is, I am very impressed, it is so much more than the desktop edition, which I find to have an awkward workflow. It is built to integrate with the iCloud file, or any other app. For example I can save an edited image to my iCloud Drive, and/or Dropbox, and/or Lightroom Mobile, all of which can make the file accessible across all my devices, and sync with desktop/laptop LR. I can transfer image files RAW, and/or JPEG, to my iPad from my X-E2, or X-T2 via WiFi. So for any of you folks with an iPad I can highly recommend Affinity Photo for iPad. Quite frankly I believe that it is currently one of the best photo editing apps available for the iPad along with the Adobe Mobile set, and Pixelmator. https://affinity.serif.com/en-us/photo/ipad/ Just curious - why not a tablet with a 12" screen - or is that too big? Would make it easier to edit high res images. While there is a 12β iPad Pro available, the 10β is the better choice when it comes to portability. The resolution provided by the Retina display is superb. I can edit 6000 x 4000 images down to a pixel level if I need to. And well, a tablet for image editing, not sure how much sense that makes. It makes a lot of sense. It is actually a natural interface, and the Apple Pencil takes controlability to a level tough to obtain on a desktop/laptop environment, even with a Wacom Tablet. Personally I need a fast processor, a screen as large/high res as possible and lots of storage (on a typical trip I take 100-150 GB of image files, and uploading these to a cloud is not really feasible). When I factor all that in, the ideal device is a notebook PC. To start with, the Apple A10X with M10 coprocessor is as fast for my needs as most laptop/desktop machines, and in some cases faster. I bought my new iPad with the 512GB option, more than enough to handle 100-150 GB of image files. The manner with which the current generation of iPad /iOS 11 hardware/software integrates with the various cloud services is seamless, and very feasable. The battery gives me 10 hours of portability which slips easily into a camera bag, and provides me with all the function I need on the road, and then some, all with less weight and bulk than even a notebook PC. By the way, I gave a try a while ago to the desktop version of Affinity and wasn't impressed. As for the desltop version of Affinity Photo, it is very good, but for somebody who has the habit of a Lightroom/Photoshop workflow, it is for me a little awkward. Affinity Photo for iPad is a very different animal to work with, and is in many ways the best tablet editor I have yet encountered, and in many ways better than many desktop editors. As I said, I have all the free Adobe Mobile apps installed, along with Pixelmator, VSCO, and Snapseed, currently my choice for on-the-road image editing is Affinity Photo for iPad. -- Regards, Savageduck |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On Sep 23, 2017, Alan Browne wrote
(in ): On 2017-09-23 04:51, Alfred Molon wrote: In iganews.com, Savageduck says... I bought a new toy last week, a 10.5? iPad Pro, with 512 GB, the keyboard, and Apple Pencil. My purpose was to update my old iPad2, and to see how well it would fit in as a replacement for a laptop for my photo travels. I already had the Adobe Mobile Apps, Lightroom Mobile, Photoshop Fix, and Photoshop Mix installed, and I had read good things regarding Affinity Photo for iPad. So, I stepped and bought it. The end result is, I am very impressed, it is so much more than the desktop edition, which I find to have an awkward workflow. It is built to integrate with the iCloud file, or any other app. For example I can save an edited image to my iCloud Drive, and/or Dropbox, and/or Lightroom Mobile, all of which can make the file accessible across all my devices, and sync with desktop/laptop LR. I can transfer image files RAW, and/or JPEG, to my iPad from my X-E2, or X-T2 via WiFi. So for any of you folks with an iPad I can highly recommend Affinity Photo for iPad. Quite frankly I believe that it is currently one of the best photo editing apps available for the iPad along with the Adobe Mobile set, and Pixelmator. https://affinity.serif.com/en-us/photo/ipad/ Just curious - why not a tablet with a 12" screen - or is that too big? Would make it easier to edit high res images. The difference between the 12 and 10.5" is not enough to matter when portability on a long trip is factored in. I had considered the 12β, but after working with one in the Apple store, the portability factor kicked in, and I loose nothing but bulk and weight with the 10.5β. And well, a tablet for image editing, not sure how much sense that makes. Image editing on a tablet? Very natural interface. Very much so. Personally I need a fast processor, a screen as large/high res as The ARM/GPU in the iPad's are very fast. Indeed it's a near certainty that ARM will begin to replace intel in the Apple Mac line in the coming years. The A10X is amazingly fast. possible and lots of storage (on a typical trip I take 100-150 GB of image files, and uploading these to a cloud is not really feasible). When I factor all that in, the ideal device is a notebook PC. Hmm. 512 GB is quite a lot then. No issue. No cloud needed. 512 GB is as much as many laptops are provided with, and just incase I need a little bit of extra storage I have a 128 GB Sandisk iXpand Flash drive, and there is a 256 GB edition available. https://www.sandisk.com/home/mobile-device-storage/ixpand I can't speak about Affinity, but I can say that I will never buy an Adobe photo editing product again. In the 10 days I have been giving it a work out, I can say Affinity Photo for iPad lacks for nothing. -- Regards, Savageduck |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On Sep 23, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ): On 9/23/2017 9:07 AM, Alan Browne wrote: snip. Hmm. 512 GB is quite a lot then. No issue. No cloud needed. When I was traveling I looked into the iPad. Because of my workflow, it didn't work for me. Remember, I use a high megapixel camera. So far the iPad Pro is not choking on my 24.3 MP image files, and Affinity Photo handles my RAFs, NEFs, and SOOC JPEGs well. I can't speak about Affinity, but I can say that I will never buy an Adobe photo editing product again. I recently asked Topaz if they had any tutorials that might solve an issue I was having with hair extraction using Re Mask, after they updated it. First they suggested Clarity, to increase contrast. When I pointed out that I had clarity and it did not work, they never answered my support question. I plan to bring that issue up at Photo Expo in NY, and continue looking on their forum. Meanwhile, Adobe is the best around, if only because of their available support. I am not a fan of Topaz, or Clarity. -- Regards, Savageduck |
Affinity Photo for iPad
In article .com,
Savageduck wrote: When I was traveling I looked into the iPad. Because of my workflow, it didn't work for me. Remember, I use a high megapixel camera. So far the iPad Pro is not choking on my 24.3 MP image files, and Affinity Photo handles my RAFs, NEFs, and SOOC JPEGs well. no reason why it would choke at all. it's *very* capable. |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On Sep 23, 2017, nospam wrote
(in ) : In iganews.com, Savageduck wrote: When I was traveling I looked into the iPad. Because of my workflow, it didn't work for me. Remember, I use a high megapixel camera. So far the iPad Pro is not choking on my 24.3 MP image files, and Affinity Photo handles my RAFs, NEFs, and SOOC JPEGs well. no reason why it would choke at all. it's *very* capable. I know. Why, when I have it sitting in front of me after 10 days of exercising it, should I think otherwise? -- Regards, Savageduck |
Affinity Photo for iPad
In article , Davoud says...
? You don't have to upload the image files to a cloud; the software does it for you as you take the photos. The problem is the connectivity. Often connections are slow and if you have a 5GB package, you can't upload 100GB. But again, in many interesting countries the Internet connections (both mobile and fixed) are just too slow. Try doing a cloud upload in Papua for instance. -- Alfred Molon Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
Affinity Photo for iPad
In article .com,
Savageduck wrote: When I was traveling I looked into the iPad. Because of my workflow, it didn't work for me. Remember, I use a high megapixel camera. So far the iPad Pro is not choking on my 24.3 MP image files, and Affinity Photo handles my RAFs, NEFs, and SOOC JPEGs well. no reason why it would choke at all. it's *very* capable. I know. Why, when I have it sitting in front of me after 10 days of exercising it, should I think otherwise? you obviously know what it can do. many others do not, and consider the ipad to be somehow inferior and incapable. |
Affinity Photo for iPad
In article , Alfred Molon
wrote: ? You don't have to upload the image files to a cloud; the software does it for you as you take the photos. The problem is the connectivity. Often connections are slow and if you have a 5GB package, you can't upload 100GB. often connections are quite fast, but if not, use wifi. or just keep everything local. with 512 gig of space, 100 gig won't make much of a dent. But again, in many interesting countries the Internet connections (both mobile and fixed) are just too slow. Try doing a cloud upload in Papua for instance. how often are you in a location where there's no wifi or cellular, where you've completely filled all of the 512 gig of the device, and where you don't have any other local storage options, forcing you to upload content to free up space? likely never. |
Affinity Photo for iPad
In article .com,
Savageduck says... While there is a 12? iPad Pro available, the 10? is the better choice when it comes to portability. The resolution provided by the Retina display is superb. I can edit 6000 x 4000 images down to a pixel level if I need to. Maybe your eyesight is better than mine, but if I have to go through 200-300 images in the evening, a big screen helps a lot. For my purposes, a 10" screen is just too small. I cannot zoom in and out all the time. Actually even 12" is too small. I'd like to have at least 14". snip To start with, the Apple A10X with M10 coprocessor is as fast for my needs as most laptop/desktop machines, and in some cases faster. But tablets are optimised for battery life, not performance. When you quickly browse through hundreds of images, open RAWs for editing trying out different settings, use panorama software to stitch images - that all drains the battery quite a lot. By the way, RAM also matters. 10 or more GB are very helpful in my case, but I don't think there are tablets with that much RAM, are there? snip The battery gives me 10 hours of portability which slips easily into a camera bag, and provides me with all the function I need on the road, and then some, all with less weight and bulk than even a notebook PC. But there is no need to lug around the tablet the whole day, while you are taking pictures, right? Just leave it in the hotel, or why would you want to carry it around? Instead of the tablet you can bring along another lens, a flash or piece of photo equipment, which improves your photo capture capability in the field. -- Alfred Molon Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
Affinity Photo for iPad
In article , Alfred
Molon wrote: While there is a 12? iPad Pro available, the 10? is the better choice when it comes to portability. The resolution provided by the Retina display is superb. I can edit 6000 x 4000 images down to a pixel level if I need to. Maybe your eyesight is better than mine, but if I have to go through 200-300 images in the evening, a big screen helps a lot. For my purposes, a 10" screen is just too small. I cannot zoom in and out all the time. Actually even 12" is too small. I'd like to have at least 14". the bigger the display, the less portable it is. To start with, the Apple A10X with M10 coprocessor is as fast for my needs as most laptop/desktop machines, and in some cases faster. But tablets are optimised for battery life, not performance. nope. an ipad pro is faster than most laptops. When you quickly browse through hundreds of images, open RAWs for editing trying out different settings, use panorama software to stitch images - that all drains the battery quite a lot. nope. ipads get over 10 hours on battery when pushed hard and longer if the cpu is running on the efficiency cores (e.g., browsing images). that's *better* battery life than most laptops, even when the laptop is doing mundane tasks (i.e., minimal battery drain). it's also *extremely* likely that any photo editing would be done while plugged in and *not* on a battery, regardless of tablet or laptop, so it doesn't make one bit of difference what the battery life is. By the way, RAM also matters. 10 or more GB are very helpful in my case, but I don't think there are tablets with that much RAM, are there? ram doesn't matter anywhere near as much as you think it does, particularly for ipads (and iphones for that matter). in real world use scenarios, ipads do exceptionally well, and in some cases, faster than desktop systems. The battery gives me 10 hours of portability which slips easily into a camera bag, and provides me with all the function I need on the road, and then some, all with less weight and bulk than even a notebook PC. But there is no need to lug around the tablet the whole day, while you are taking pictures, right? Just leave it in the hotel, or why would you want to carry it around? lug??? an ipad weighs 1 pound and fits in a jacket pocket. an ipad mini weighs less and can fit in all but the smallest pockets. why *wouldn't* you want to carry it around? Instead of the tablet you can bring along another lens, a flash or piece of photo equipment, which improves your photo capture capability in the field. a lens is bulkier and likely heavier than an ipad, and serves an entirely different purpose. bring both. |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On Sep 23, 2017, Alfred Molon wrote
(in om): In , Davoud says... ? You don't have to upload the image files to a cloud; the software does it for you as you take the photos. The problem is the connectivity. Often connections are slow and if you have a 5GB package, you can't upload 100GB. Then donβt bother with the cloud, use local storage on the iPad, or supplemental storage with: https://www.sandisk.com/home/mobile-device-storage/ixpand ....or one of these which works just fine with an iPad. https://www.sandisk.com/home/mobile-device-storage/ixpand-base But again, in many interesting countries the Internet connections (both mobile and fixed) are just too slow. Try doing a cloud upload in Papua for instance. So what? Papua NG, or the Amazon Basin would be a very different road trip to one in Europe, North America, or South Africa, so you would plan, and provision differently. Different locations are going to have different requirements, so you plan for them. In December and January I spent a month away from home in the Netherlands and South Africa, where I travelled light with all my computing needs dealt with by a 256 GB iPhone 6S+, not an MBP, or notebook PC. If that iPhone could handle things, I know that I am not going to have problems with an iPad Pro with more memory, and a much more powerful processor. -- Regards, Savageduck |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On Sep 23, 2017, Alfred Molon wrote
(in . com): In iganews.com, Savageduck says... While there is a 12? iPad Pro available, the 10? is the better choice when it comes to portability. The resolution provided by the Retina display is superb. I can edit 6000 x 4000 images down to a pixel level if I need to. Maybe your eyesight is better than mine, but if I have to go through 200-300 images in the evening, a big screen helps a lot. For my purposes, a 10" screen is just too small. I cannot zoom in and out all the time. Actually even 12" is too small. I'd like to have at least 14". You are not going to know until you try. As much as I would love to have a 27β display on the road, I am not going to have that luxury. The 10.5β iPad is pretty good, very good actually, especially after having my cataract surgery. You donβt have to play the bad eyesight game with me. I have my old 17β MBP which for what I need these days is too bulky and too heavy, and is not able to run the latest MacOS. I will stick with my new iPad Pro. snip To start with, the Apple A10X with M10 coprocessor is as fast for my needs as most laptop/desktop machines, and in some cases faster. But tablets are optimised for battery life, not performance. Actually they are optimized for both battery life, and performance. When you quickly browse through hundreds of images, open RAWs for editing trying out different settings, use panorama software to stitch images - that all drains the battery quite a lot. Strangely enough, Lightroom Mobile makes browsing through hundreds of images a simple task, and it along with Affinity Photo for iPad are just two apps which handle panorama stitching quite efficiently and quickly. By the way, RAM also matters. 10 or more GB are very helpful in my case, but I don't think there are tablets with that much RAM, are there? On a desktop, or laptop certainly. However, tablets, especially the iPad manages things a little differently by optimizing what they have to work with. snip The battery gives me 10 hours of portability which slips easily into a camera bag, and provides me with all the function I need on the road, and then some, all with less weight and bulk than even a notebook PC. But there is no need to lug around the tablet the whole day, while you are taking pictures, right? Just leave it in the hotel, or why would you want to carry it around? There is no need to lug it around, but if you needed to the bit of added weight is negligible. Instead of the tablet you can bring along another lens, a flash or piece of photo equipment, which improves your photo capture capability in the field. With my Fujifilm set up, I have my camera, 4 lenses, extra batteries, some filters, and a few other goodies which all fit handily into my Domke bag. Moreover, I could if need be, slip the iPad into the back sleave of the bag. -- Regards, Savageduck |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On 2017-09-23 09:56, PeterN wrote:
On 9/23/2017 9:07 AM, Alan Browne wrote: snip. Hmm.* 512 GB is quite a lot then.* No issue.* No cloud needed. When I was traveling I looked into the iPad. Because of my workflow, it didn't work for me. Remember, I use a high megapixel camera. What's high? What size raw file? On an iPad one could easily allocate 400 GB to photography. Say 30 MB per image. That would be 13000+ images. Say you cut that in half so you can do lot's of roadshow editing. How long does it take to fill 6500 images that are probably worth keeping? In photography one tends to reduce stuff carried around that is not specific to photography. An iPad v. laptop is a no brainer. |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On 2017-09-23 11:16, Alfred Molon wrote:
In article .com, Savageduck says... While there is a 12? iPad Pro available, the 10? is the better choice when it comes to portability. The resolution provided by the Retina display is superb. I can edit 6000 x 4000 images down to a pixel level if I need to. Maybe your eyesight is better than mine, but if I have to go through 200-300 images in the evening, a big screen helps a lot. For my purposes, a 10" screen is just too small. I cannot zoom in and out all the time. Actually even 12" is too small. I'd like to have at least 14". Then get the iPad 12". Solved easily. Or reading glasses. But there is no need to lug around the tablet the whole day, while you are taking pictures, right? Just leave it in the hotel, or why would you want to carry it around? One wouldn't. You brought up the notion of traveling with an iPad or laptop. The lightest, least bulky solution is an iPad. (That said, a Macbook Air is hardly much larger). Instead of the tablet you can bring along another lens, a flash or piece of photo equipment, which improves your photo capture capability in the field. Of course. But you would not likely bring a laptop into the field either, so it's a non argument when comparing iPad to laptop. |
Affinity Photo for iPad
In article , Alan Browne
says... Of course. But you would not likely bring a laptop into the field either, so it's a non argument when comparing iPad to laptop. But then, if size and weight are not an issue, just travel with a 15.6" notebook PC and enjoy the much larger screen and the full power of a PC. -- Alfred Molon Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On 2017-09-23 14:44, Alfred Molon wrote:
In article , Alan Browne says... Of course. But you would not likely bring a laptop into the field either, so it's a non argument when comparing iPad to laptop. But then, if size and weight are not an issue, just travel with a 15.6" notebook PC and enjoy the much larger screen and the full power of a PC. And the size, weight and bulk of it and its power supply. Been through a two transfer intercontinental flight recently? TANSTAAFL. |
Affinity Photo for iPad
In article , Alfred Molon
wrote: Of course. But you would not likely bring a laptop into the field either, so it's a non argument when comparing iPad to laptop. But then, if size and weight are not an issue, just travel with a 15.6" notebook PC with less space in luggage for other stuff, possibly running into weight limits on some airlines. an ipad fits in a jacket pocket and they don't weigh jackets. try putting a 15" laptop in a jacket. good luck on that. and enjoy the much larger screen and the full power of a PC. ipad pros are more powerful than most laptops. |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On 23/09/2017 17:09, Savageduck wrote:
[] You are not going to know until you try. That's the essence of it! -- Cheers, David Web: http://www.satsignal.eu |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On Sep 23, 2017, Alfred Molon wrote
(in . com): In iganews.com, Savageduck says... While there is a 12? iPad Pro available, the 10? is the better choice when it comes to portability. The resolution provided by the Retina display is superb. I can edit 6000 x 4000 images down to a pixel level if I need to. Maybe your eyesight is better than mine, but if I have to go through 200-300 images in the evening, a big screen helps a lot. For my purposes, a 10" screen is just too small. I cannot zoom in and out all the time. Actually even 12" is too small. I'd like to have at least 14". snip To start with, the Apple A10X with M10 coprocessor is as fast for my needs as most laptop/desktop machines, and in some cases faster. But tablets are optimised for battery life, not performance. When you quickly browse through hundreds of images, open RAWs for editing trying out different settings, use panorama software to stitch images - that all drains the battery quite a lot. Just for the Hell of it, since I had yet to stitch a panorama with Affinity Photo on the iPad Pro I thought I should at least say I had done it. To start with I took this sequence of three shots from last year, and from my desktop, dropped them into an iCloud folder. I then went to the iPad and opened Affinity Photo - selected New Panorama, and selected the three shots for stitching. Created the uncropped pano. Cleaned up the crop so that the image is ready for any adjustments. Other than picking out the shots on my desktop, the entire iPad pano stitching operation took less than one minute. Here is how things happened on the iPad. https://www.dropbox.com/sh/lu9r03r0p97fbju/AAD4Y4UwhMROPrL3oJXs94Txa -- Regards, Savageduck |
Affinity Photo for iPad
In article .com,
Savageduck wrote: To start with, the Apple A10X with M10 coprocessor is as fast for my needs as most laptop/desktop machines, and in some cases faster. But tablets are optimised for battery life, not performance. When you quickly browse through hundreds of images, open RAWs for editing trying out different settings, use panorama software to stitch images - that all drains the battery quite a lot. Just for the Hell of it, since I had yet to stitch a panorama with Affinity Photo on the iPad Pro I thought I should at least say I had done it. how much battery did it use? |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On Sep 23, 2017, David Taylor wrote
(in article ): On 23/09/2017 17:09, Savageduck wrote: [] You are not going to know until you try. That's the essence of it! You are correct. That is the essence of it. I bought the iPad Pro, updated to iOS 11. Loaded it with software I have used, and software I am learning such as Affinity Photo. I am running all sorts of road tests, and I know it will do the job because I have tried it. -- Regards, Savageduck |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On Sep 23, 2017, nospam wrote
(in ) : In iganews.com, Savageduck wrote: To start with, the Apple A10X with M10 coprocessor is as fast for my needs as most laptop/desktop machines, and in some cases faster. But tablets are optimised for battery life, not performance. When you quickly browse through hundreds of images, open RAWs for editing trying out different settings, use panorama software to stitch images - that all drains the battery quite a lot. Just for the Hell of it, since I had yet to stitch a panorama with Affinity Photo on the iPad Pro I thought I should at least say I had done it. how much battery did it use? Zip! I started the pano with 100% and ended with 100%. I have been doing some other screwing around on the iPad with the Camera Roll and some iOS 11 features since doing that pano, and it is now at 98%. -- Regards, Savageduck |
Affinity Photo for iPad
In article .com,
Savageduck wrote: To start with, the Apple A10X with M10 coprocessor is as fast for my needs as most laptop/desktop machines, and in some cases faster. But tablets are optimised for battery life, not performance. When you quickly browse through hundreds of images, open RAWs for editing trying out different settings, use panorama software to stitch images - that all drains the battery quite a lot. Just for the Hell of it, since I had yet to stitch a panorama with Affinity Photo on the iPad Pro I thought I should at least say I had done it. how much battery did it use? Zip! I started the pano with 100% and ended with 100%. it's not zip. it just means it's less than 1%, possibly less than 0.5% depending whether it rounds off versus truncates. I have been doing some other screwing around on the iPad with the Camera Roll and some iOS 11 features since doing that pano, and it is now at 98%. yep. battery life is *not* an issue. |
Affinity Photo for iPad
In article , Alan Browne
says... And the size, weight and bulk of it and its power supply. Been through a two transfer intercontinental flight recently? Yes, just came back from Malaysia with a 15,6" notebook. The weight was 2kg - not a big deal. The power supply is a small thing. -- Alfred Molon Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
Affinity Photo for iPad
Alan Browne:
I can't speak about Affinity, but I can say that I will never buy an Adobe photo editing product again. Stop me if you've heard this one. If any of the following is true you are a professional you are an amateur your photographs are important to you you have a large number of photographs to manage you prefer doing things the easy way then you are cutting off your nose to spite your face if you are boycotting Adobe for some reason. Butit's your nose and your face. -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm |
Affinity Photo for iPad
In article , Alfred
Molon wrote: And the size, weight and bulk of it and its power supply. Been through a two transfer intercontinental flight recently? Yes, just came back from Malaysia with a 15,6" notebook. The weight was 2kg - not a big deal. The power supply is a small thing. now compare that with an ipad pro at 477g or an ipad mini at 304g. then compare which one fits in a jacket pocket. its power supply is any 5v usb adapter, such as the one you already have for your phone. in other words, nothing extra to bring. |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On 9/23/2017 12:14 PM, Alan Browne wrote:
On 2017-09-23 09:56, PeterN wrote: On 9/23/2017 9:07 AM, Alan Browne wrote: snip. Hmm.* 512 GB is quite a lot then.* No issue.* No cloud needed. When I was traveling I looked into the iPad. Because of my workflow, it didn't work for me. Remember, I use a high megapixel camera. What's high?* What size raw file? On an iPad one could easily allocate 400 GB to photography.* Say 30 MB per image.* That would be 13000+ images.* Say you cut that in half so you can do lot's of roadshow editing.* How long does it take to fill 6500 images that are probably worth keeping? In photography one tends to reduce stuff carried around that is not specific to photography.* An iPad v. laptop is a no brainer. RAW size for a D800 Image quality Image size File size*2 FX (36x24)*1 NEF (RAW), Lossless compressed, 12-bit - 32.4 MB NEF (RAW), Lossless compressed, 14-bit - 41.3 MB NEF (RAW), Compressed, 12-bit - 29.0 MB Also, there were times I wanted to do some procession. My laptop had a 17" screen. The iPad also belongs to my wife. Every day I took the days shooting, and downloaded it onto the Notebook, and backed up to 2 portable HDs. If I did any processing the file size increased. -- PeterN |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On Sep 23, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ): On 9/23/2017 12:14 PM, Alan Browne wrote: On 2017-09-23 09:56, PeterN wrote: On 9/23/2017 9:07 AM, Alan Browne wrote: snip. Hmm. 512 GB is quite a lot then. No issue. No cloud needed. When I was traveling I looked into the iPad. Because of my workflow, it didn't work for me. Remember, I use a high megapixel camera. What's high? What size raw file? On an iPad one could easily allocate 400 GB to photography. Say 30 MB per image. That would be 13000+ images. Say you cut that in half so you can do lot's of roadshow editing. How long does it take to fill 6500 images that are probably worth keeping? In photography one tends to reduce stuff carried around that is not specific to photography. An iPad v. laptop is a no brainer. RAW size for a D800 Image quality Image size File size*2 FX (36x24)*1 NEF (RAW), Lossless compressed, 12-bit - 32.4 MB NEF (RAW), Lossless compressed, 14-bit - 41.3 MB NEF (RAW), Compressed, 12-bit - 29.0 MB Also, there were times I wanted to do some procession. My laptop had a 17" screen. The iPad also belongs to my wife. Every day I took the days shooting, and downloaded it onto the Notebook, and backed up to 2 portable HDs. If I did any processing the file size increased. ....and you also have your D500. As for me and the iPad with the X-T2 APS-C, 6000 x 4000 files I have this: RAF (RAW) uncompressed 14-bit = 50.6 MB RAF (RAW) lossless compressed 14-bit = 21-25 MB JPEG, content dependant SOOC, = 10.1-15.6 MB The iPad Pro with 512 GB on board does just fine with those files. -- Regards, Savageduck |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On 23/09/2017 17:09, Savageduck wrote:
On Sep 23, 2017, Alfred Molon wrote snip The battery gives me 10 hours of portability which slips easily into a camera bag, and provides me with all the function I need on the road, and then some, all with less weight and bulk than even a notebook PC. But there is no need to lug around the tablet the whole day, while you are taking pictures, right? Just leave it in the hotel, or why would you want to carry it around? There is no need to lug it around, but if you needed to the bit of added weight is negligible. Instead of the tablet you can bring along another lens, a flash or piece of photo equipment, which improves your photo capture capability in the field. With my Fujifilm set up, I have my camera, 4 lenses, extra batteries, some filters, and a few other goodies which all fit handily into my Domke bag. Moreover, I could if need be, slip the iPad into the back sleave of the bag. JOOI, what sort of case do you use for the iPad? I've had a succession of iPads - wonderful things. But I've never found a case that protects the iPad without doubling the bulk and adding about half to the weight. Of course, we all have a different view of 'protect'. -- Cheers, Rob |
Affinity Photo for iPad
On 23/09/2017 20:53, Savageduck wrote:
On Sep 23, 2017, Alfred Molon wrote (in . com): In iganews.com, Savageduck says... While there is a 12? iPad Pro available, the 10? is the better choice when it comes to portability. The resolution provided by the Retina display is superb. I can edit 6000 x 4000 images down to a pixel level if I need to. Maybe your eyesight is better than mine, but if I have to go through 200-300 images in the evening, a big screen helps a lot. For my purposes, a 10" screen is just too small. I cannot zoom in and out all the time. Actually even 12" is too small. I'd like to have at least 14". snip To start with, the Apple A10X with M10 coprocessor is as fast for my needs as most laptop/desktop machines, and in some cases faster. But tablets are optimised for battery life, not performance. When you quickly browse through hundreds of images, open RAWs for editing trying out different settings, use panorama software to stitch images - that all drains the battery quite a lot. Just for the Hell of it, since I had yet to stitch a panorama with Affinity Photo on the iPad Pro I thought I should at least say I had done it. To start with I took this sequence of three shots from last year, and from my desktop, dropped them into an iCloud folder. I then went to the iPad and opened Affinity Photo - selected New Panorama, and selected the three shots for stitching. Created the uncropped pano. Cleaned up the crop so that the image is ready for any adjustments. Other than picking out the shots on my desktop, the entire iPad pano stitching operation took less than one minute. Here is how things happened on the iPad. https://www.dropbox.com/sh/lu9r03r0p97fbju/AAD4Y4UwhMROPrL3oJXs94Txa Impressive! But those are 1MB files - do things slow up a lot with 30MB RAW files? -- Cheers, Rob |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PhotoBanter.com