Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF...
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08..._7_6.asp#specs -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
Alan Browne wrote:
Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF... http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08..._7_6.asp#specs Maximum image file size: 345MP. IIIeeeeeee! -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html |
Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
Blinky the Shark wrote:
Alan Browne wrote: Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF... http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08..._7_6.asp#specs Maximum image file size: 345MP. IIIeeeeeee! When I scan MF film I get near 500 Mpix per image. But I bet the digital cameras (Leaf or Blad) give cleaner images... -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
Alan Browne wrote:
Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF... http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08..._7_6.asp#specs What sorts of lenses do these cameras (As opposed to backs) use? I was unable to find good info on Google ... I did find mention of Schneider and 70 lp/mm. Doug McDonald |
Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
lid wrote:
Alan Browne wrote: Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF... http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08..._7_6.asp#specs What sorts of lenses do these cameras (As opposed to backs) use? I was unable to find good info on Google ... I did find mention of Schneider and 70 lp/mm. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leaf_Me...at_Photography notes that it uses a line of Schneider AF 'digital' lenses as well as Rollei 6008 lenses (of which there are more than Schneider... http://www.rollei.jp/e/pd/rl60_lens.html ) -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
Alan Browne wrote:
Blinky the Shark wrote: Alan Browne wrote: Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF... http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08..._7_6.asp#specs Maximum image file size: 345MP. IIIeeeeeee! When I scan MF film I get near 500 Mpix per image. But I bet the digital cameras (Leaf or Blad) give cleaner images... If not, your money back..... -- john mcwilliams |
Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
Blinky the Shark wrote,on my timestamp of 11/09/2008 6:36 AM:
Alan Browne wrote: Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF... http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08..._7_6.asp#specs Maximum image file size: 345MP. IIIeeeeeee! Pah! That's nothing! |
Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
Richard wrote:
"Alan Browne" wrote in message ... Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF... Good thing they have lots of "Leaf" lenses to do it with. Hah hah ahah ! As Alan has mentioned, this system can use the lenses designed for the 6008i series of cameras. So, there are a full range of lenses available. Neil |
Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
Scott W wrote:
On Sep 10, 10:57 am, Alan Browne wrote: Blinky the Shark wrote: Alan Browne wrote: Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF... http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08...tus_10_7_6.asp... Maximum image file size: 345MP. IIIeeeeeee! When I scan MF film I get near 500 Mpix per image. But I bet the digital cameras (Leaf or Blad) give cleaner images... You must mean 500 MBtyes, not MPix. a frame from a 6x9 camera scanned at 4000 ppi would give you about 125 MPix. You would have to be scanning at 8000 ppi to get to 500 MP. Quite correct, I meant Mbytes; However, 4000 dpi (56mm / 25.4 * 4000 = ~8800) @ 16 b/col So, 8800^2 pixels for about 460 Mbyte @ 48 bits/pixel. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
Leaf chasing 'blad - 50 Mpix MF DSLR announced
Alan Browne wrote:
Scott W wrote: On Sep 10, 10:57 am, Alan Browne wrote: Blinky the Shark wrote: Alan Browne wrote: Hasselblad are not alone with a 50 Mpix MF... http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08...tus_10_7_6.asp... Maximum image file size: 345MP. IIIeeeeeee! When I scan MF film I get near 500 Mpix per image. But I bet the digital cameras (Leaf or Blad) give cleaner images... You must mean 500 MBtyes, not MPix. a frame from a 6x9 camera scanned at 4000 ppi would give you about 125 MPix. You would have to be scanning at 8000 ppi to get to 500 MP. Quite correct, I meant Mbytes; However, 4000 dpi (56mm / 25.4 * 4000 = ~8800) @ 16 b/col So, 8800^2 pixels for about 460 Mbyte @ 48 bits/pixel. Last sentence: pixels. Previous one: dpi: Disconnect! Are you purposely using that misnomer to prove something, or do you still not get it that it can make a difference to others' understanding, no matter how perfectly you get it? -- john mcwilliams |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PhotoBanter.com