Brit mag rates E-1 and 1DsMk 2 as best cameras
 

Amateur Photographer rated them according to various
things, but what it came down to was image quality
with the 1DsMk2 and E-1 coming closest to good film
compared to the other 10 DSLRs on test. Egonomics, etc,
also came into play.
-Rich


"Bittorrents are REFUNDS for all the BAD movie products Hollywood
never gave us refunds for in the past"

"RichA" wrote in message
...
Amateur Photographer rated them according to various
things, but what it came down to was image quality
with the 1DsMk2 and E-1 coming closest to good film
compared to the other 10 DSLRs on test. Egonomics, etc,
also came into play.
-Rich

....and British magazine Practical Photography Film & Digital Sept 2005 rated
Canon 20D Testers choice, Nikon D50 best buy.
350D, 20D & 1DSMkII got 5 stars whilst E-300, *ist DL & SD10 got 3 (lowest)

"dylan" wrote in message
...

"RichA" wrote in message
...
Amateur Photographer rated them according to various
things, but what it came down to was image quality
with the 1DsMk2 and E-1 coming closest to good film
compared to the other 10 DSLRs on test. Egonomics, etc,
also came into play.
-Rich

...and British magazine Practical Photography Film & Digital Sept 2005
rated Canon 20D Testers choice, Nikon D50 best buy.
350D, 20D & 1DSMkII got 5 stars whilst E-300, *ist DL & SD10 got 3
(lowest)

Which is really strange because if I was rating them I would drop the 350D
off alltogether because I think the ergonomics suck big time, but there you
go.

"Pete D" wrote in message
...

"dylan" wrote in message
...

"RichA" wrote in message
...
Amateur Photographer rated them according to various
things, but what it came down to was image quality
with the 1DsMk2 and E-1 coming closest to good film
compared to the other 10 DSLRs on test. Egonomics, etc,
also came into play.
-Rich

...and British magazine Practical Photography Film & Digital Sept 2005
rated Canon 20D Testers choice, Nikon D50 best buy.
350D, 20D & 1DSMkII got 5 stars whilst E-300, *ist DL & SD10 got 3
(lowest)

Which is really strange because if I was rating them I would drop the 350D
off alltogether because I think the ergonomics suck big time, but there
you go.

They did comment in the 'Cons' column :- " Small size can prove
uncomfortable for users with large hands ".
Perhaps thats why it didn't get Best Buy.

Size of the camera in this case would be a qualitative judgement, not
quantitative. Quality of the pics don't suffer, its just personal
preference...

/like my 350D and its size, and I'm 6'1, 200lbs.

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:02:04 GMT, "Pete D" wrote:

"dylan" wrote in message
...

"RichA" wrote in message
...

what it came down to was image quality
with the 1DsMk2 and E-1 coming closest to good film
compared to the other 10 DSLRs on test. Egonomics, etc,
also came into play.

...and British magazine Practical Photography Film & Digital Sept 2005
rated Canon 20D Testers choice, Nikon D50 best buy.
350D, 20D & 1DSMkII got 5 stars whilst E-300, *ist DL & SD10 got 3
(lowest)

Which is really strange because if I was rating them I would drop the 350D
off alltogether because I think the ergonomics suck big time, but there you
go.

This only goes to prove that the only accurate review is the one done
by the intended buyer/user. But then we already knew that..... ;-)

Al
--
[This space intentionally left blank]

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:58:50 +0100, Alan Bremner
wrote:

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:02:04 GMT, "Pete D" wrote:

"dylan" wrote in message
...

"RichA" wrote in message
...

what it came down to was image quality
with the 1DsMk2 and E-1 coming closest to good film
compared to the other 10 DSLRs on test. Egonomics, etc,
also came into play.

...and British magazine Practical Photography Film & Digital Sept 2005
rated Canon 20D Testers choice, Nikon D50 best buy.
350D, 20D & 1DSMkII got 5 stars whilst E-300, *ist DL & SD10 got 3
(lowest)

Which is really strange because if I was rating them I would drop the 350D
off alltogether because I think the ergonomics suck big time, but there you
go.

This only goes to prove that the only accurate review is the one done
by the intended buyer/user. But then we already knew that..... ;-)

Al

Only for ergonomics. Performance is performance and doesn't
vary from person to person if they follow the same rules.
-Rich


"Bittorrents are REFUNDS for all the BAD movie products Hollywood
never gave us refunds for in the past"

...and British magazine Practical Photography Film & Digital Sept 2005
rated Canon 20D Testers choice, Nikon D50 best buy.
350D, 20D & 1DSMkII got 5 stars whilst E-300, *ist DL & SD10 got 3
(lowest)

Which is really strange because if I was rating them I would drop the 350D
off alltogether because I think the ergonomics suck big time, but there
you
go.

The 350D works great for my girlfriend. She loves it. I can barely take a
photo with it because my hands are too big. More and more I am convinced
the 350D is the 20D for women - which is /not/ a bad thing.

--
Mark

Photos, Ideas & Opinions
http://www.marklauter.com

Beach Bum wrote:
...and British magazine Practical Photography Film & Digital Sept 2005
rated Canon 20D Testers choice, Nikon D50 best buy.
350D, 20D & 1DSMkII got 5 stars whilst E-300, *ist DL & SD10 got 3
(lowest)

Which is really strange because if I was rating them I would drop the 350D
off alltogether because I think the ergonomics suck big time, but there

you

go.


The 350D works great for my girlfriend. She loves it. I can barely take a
photo with it because my hands are too big. More and more I am convinced
the 350D is the 20D for women - which is /not/ a bad thing.


Hey, what are you saying, the 350D is a chick camera?
--
Slack - hands like a chick

wrote in message
oups.com...
Size of the camera in this case would be a qualitative judgement, not
quantitative. Quality of the pics don't suffer, its just personal
preference...

/like my 350D and its size, and I'm 6'1, 200lbs.

Just think how happy you would be with a decent sized hand grip.