PhotoBanter.com

PhotoBanter.com (http://www.photobanter.com/index.php)
-   Digital Photography (http://www.photobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   iPhone Photos? (http://www.photobanter.com/showthread.php?t=131882)

RJH December 17th 18 05:53 PM

iPhone Photos?
 
I see Samsung has been found out using non-phone photos to market their
phone cameras:

https://www.diyphotography.net/samsu...portrait-mode/

When I was in London a few months back I noticed some iPhone ads on the
underground - huge posters, maybe 4m x 6m - advertising 'selfie' photos
from what I assumed to be an iPhone camera. How does that work? They
couldn't possibly have come from the iPhone . . .

--
Cheers, Rob

nospam December 17th 18 06:09 PM

iPhone Photos?
 
In article , RJH wrote:

I see Samsung has been found out using non-phone photos to market their
phone cameras:

https://www.diyphotography.net/samsu...-their-phones-
portrait-mode/


not only did they use a non-phone photo, but they stole the image.

it ain't the first time they've been caught and it definitely won't be
their last. deception is fundamental to their corporate culture.

When I was in London a few months back I noticed some iPhone ads on the
underground - huge posters, maybe 4m x 6m - advertising 'selfie' photos
from what I assumed to be an iPhone camera. How does that work? They
couldn't possibly have come from the iPhone . . .


of course it could, and did.

Davoud December 17th 18 07:04 PM

iPhone Photos?
 
RJH:
When I was in London a few months back I noticed some iPhone ads on the
underground - huge posters, maybe 4m x 6m - advertising 'selfie' photos
from what I assumed to be an iPhone camera. How does that work? They
couldn't possibly have come from the iPhone . . .


Not so. With the kind of printing used for large ads a modern iPhone or
other phone could easily produce a 20 meters by nn meters. Check out
London, Paris, NYC (Times Square area), Tokyo...

--
I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that
you will say in your entire life.

usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm

ray carter December 17th 18 10:22 PM

iPhone Photos?
 
On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 17:53:39 +0000, RJH wrote:

I see Samsung has been found out using non-phone photos to market their
phone cameras:

https://www.diyphotography.net/samsu...to-fake-their-

phones-portrait-mode/

When I was in London a few months back I noticed some iPhone ads on the
underground - huge posters, maybe 4m x 6m - advertising 'selfie' photos
from what I assumed to be an iPhone camera. How does that work? They
couldn't possibly have come from the iPhone . . .


I thought that only apple could sell iphone.

nospam December 17th 18 10:34 PM

iPhone Photos?
 
In article , ray carter
wrote:


I see Samsung has been found out using non-phone photos to market their
phone cameras:

https://www.diyphotography.net/samsu...to-fake-their-

phones-portrait-mode/

When I was in London a few months back I noticed some iPhone ads on the
underground - huge posters, maybe 4m x 6m - advertising 'selfie' photos
from what I assumed to be an iPhone camera. How does that work? They
couldn't possibly have come from the iPhone . . .


I thought that only apple could sell iphone.


you thought wrong, and what does that have to do with samsung's
deceptive ads?

Tony Cooper[_2_] December 17th 18 11:15 PM

iPhone Photos?
 
On 17 Dec 2018 22:22:04 GMT, ray carter wrote:

On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 17:53:39 +0000, RJH wrote:

I see Samsung has been found out using non-phone photos to market their
phone cameras:

https://www.diyphotography.net/samsu...to-fake-their-

phones-portrait-mode/

When I was in London a few months back I noticed some iPhone ads on the
underground - huge posters, maybe 4m x 6m - advertising 'selfie' photos
from what I assumed to be an iPhone camera. How does that work? They
couldn't possibly have come from the iPhone . . .


I thought that only apple could sell iphone.


And US Congressman Steve King thinks Google makes iPhones.

--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

RJH December 20th 18 06:37 AM

iPhone Photos?
 
On 17/12/2018 18:09, nospam wrote:
In article , RJH wrote:

snip

When I was in London a few months back I noticed some iPhone ads on the
underground - huge posters, maybe 4m x 6m - advertising 'selfie' photos
from what I assumed to be an iPhone camera. How does that work? They
couldn't possibly have come from the iPhone . . .


of course it could, and did.


OK. But how does such a small photo get blown up on such a scale without
any apparent pixleation or loss of quality? This is a photo (admittedly
rubbish!) I took at the time:

https://www.icloud.com/sharedalbum/#B0z5qXGF10wysQ

Are you saying photos I take using the front camera on my iPhone (an XS)
is capable of the same?

--
Cheers, Rob

nospam December 20th 18 02:57 PM

iPhone Photos?
 
In article , RJH wrote:

When I was in London a few months back I noticed some iPhone ads on the
underground - huge posters, maybe 4m x 6m - advertising 'selfie' photos
from what I assumed to be an iPhone camera. How does that work? They
couldn't possibly have come from the iPhone . . .


of course it could, and did.


OK. But how does such a small photo get blown up on such a scale without
any apparent pixleation or loss of quality?


billboards and posters are not intended to be viewed from up close. any
loss in quality is not likely to be noticed.

This is a photo (admittedly
rubbish!) I took at the time:

https://www.icloud.com/sharedalbum/#B0z5qXGF10wysQ

Are you saying photos I take using the front camera on my iPhone (an XS)
is capable of the same?


theoretically, sure.

those are taken in ideal conditions by professional photographers.
normal selfies are not.

David B.[_5_] December 20th 18 03:31 PM

iPhone Photos?
 
On 20/12/2018 06:37, RJH wrote:
On 17/12/2018 18:09, nospam wrote:
In article , RJH wrote:

snip

When I was in London a few months back I noticed some iPhone ads on the
underground - huge posters, maybe 4m x 6m - advertisingÂ* 'selfie' photos
from what I assumed to be an iPhone camera. How does that work? They
couldn't possibly have come from the iPhone . . .


of course it could, and did.


OK. But how does such a small photo get blown up on such a scale without
any apparent pixleation or loss of quality? This is a photo (admittedly
rubbish!) I took at the time:

https://www.icloud.com/sharedalbum/#B0z5qXGF10wysQ


Hi Rob

I've tried to emulate posting a link similar to yours, but have not been
successful. Please will you give me some guidance?

TIA

--
David B.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PhotoBanter.com