[SI] 1 week to go on Macro/Closeups
 

2012.05.18

This long weekend (Canada anyway) you have plenty of time for
"Macro/Closeup".

Since next weekend is a long weekend in the US the committee has
extended the due date by one day.

Mandate DUE DATES
------------ ----------
Macro/Closup 2012.05.28 - 10 days to go
Doors 2012.06.03 - 16
Food 2012.06.10 - 23

Rulz enforced for this SI:
///////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

300 kB max file size
1200 pixels wide (MAX)
800 pixels high (MAX)

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\////////////////////////

Rules: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/rulzpage

Send photos to: si daught moderator aht yahoo daught com
by evening New York Time on the dates above.

Please adhere to the following when YOU name YOUR photo.

NAME FORMATS: MACRO_Lisa_Horton_1.jpg
DOORS_Bret_Douglas_2.jpg
FOOD_Dudley_Hanks_3.jpg

Photos will be presented in three separate pages on the SI.

--
The Committee

[SI] 1 week to go on Macro/Closeups
 

On Fri, 18 May 2012 22:25:58 -0400, tony cooper
wrote:
: On Fri, 18 May 2012 17:43:30 -0400, SI Committee
: wrote:
:
:
: 2012.05.18
:
: This long weekend (Canada anyway) you have plenty of time for
: "Macro/Closeup".
:
: Since next weekend is a long weekend in the US the committee has
: extended the due date by one day.
:
: Mandate DUE DATES
: ------------ ----------
: Macro/Closup 2012.05.28 - 10 days to go
: Doors 2012.06.03 - 16
: Food 2012.06.10 - 23
:
: Rulz enforced for this SI:
: ///////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
:
: 300 kB max file size
: 1200 pixels wide (MAX)
: 800 pixels high (MAX)
:
: I assume you mean 1200 pixels x 800 pixels (max) or 800 pixels x 1200
: pixels (max). A portrait 800 x 1200 image (which I will be
: submitting) breaks your rule.

Your assumption implies that that a 1200 x 800 landscape image and an 800 x
1200 portrait image are equally convenient to view. But that often isn't true,
since most monitors are used in landscape mode. So it's not necessarily
unreasonable to limit the height of an entry without considering its width.

The flip side of the restriction is that you can submit an image of higher
JPEG quality without exceeding the 300KB file size limit.

Bob

[SI] 1 week to go on Macro/Closeups
 

On 2012-05-18 22:25 , tony cooper wrote:

300 kB max file size
1200 pixels wide (MAX)
800 pixels high (MAX)

I assume you mean 1200 pixels x 800 pixels (max) or 800 pixels x 1200
pixels (max). A portrait 800 x 1200 image (which I will be
submitting) breaks your rule.

The intent of the rule was not to provide 800x1200 in either
orientation, but that the photo fit the browser screen and so at 100%
sizing to avoid pbase's less than perfect re-sizing algorithm.

Most monitors are laid out at about 1000 - 1200 vertical pixels. Few
monitors are higher than 1200 pixels amongst most users - and that does
not account for the browser and bpase window which takes away more.

As with your past vertical 1200's I won't reject such an image,

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/142127910/original

but nor will I resize it. If it looks like crap on screen because it
can't be seen in entirety that's your problem.

I suggest you resize your 800x1200 to 533x800. It really doesn't
subtract from the image IMO:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/62816810/TonySmallerTest.jpg

--
"A person with a new idea is a crank until the idea succeeds."
-Samuel Clemens.

[SI] 1 week to go on Macro/Closeups
 

On 2012-05-19 10:28 , tony cooper wrote:
On Sat, 19 May 2012 10:20:33 -0400, Alan Browne
wrote:

On 2012-05-18 22:25 , tony cooper wrote:

300 kB max file size
1200 pixels wide (MAX)
800 pixels high (MAX)

I assume you mean 1200 pixels x 800 pixels (max) or 800 pixels x 1200
pixels (max). A portrait 800 x 1200 image (which I will be
submitting) breaks your rule.

The intent of the rule was not to provide 800x1200 in either
orientation, but that the photo fit the browser screen and so at 100%
sizing to avoid pbase's less than perfect re-sizing algorithm.

Most monitors are laid out at about 1000 - 1200 vertical pixels. Few
monitors are higher than 1200 pixels amongst most users - and that does
not account for the browser and bpase window which takes away more.

As with your past vertical 1200's I won't reject such an image,

http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/142127910/original

but nor will I resize it. If it looks like crap on screen because it
can't be seen in entirety that's your problem.

When my images look like crap on screen, it's not because they are
sized incorrectly. The crap effect enters somewhere between pushing
that silver button on the top of the camera and pushing the "enter"
key that sends the image flying away to you or the current host of SI.

Self-deprecating statements aside, you produce nice photos and it's a
shame if they're not optimally shown.

Robert Coe stated it most succinctly.

--
"A person with a new idea is a crank until the idea succeeds."
-Samuel Clemens.

1 week to go on Macro/Closeups
 

On 2012-05-20 22:09 , Annika1980 wrote:
How many pics can you submit?

3 photos as usual.

--
"A person with a new idea is a crank until the idea succeeds."
-Samuel Clemens.

1 week to go on Macro/Closeups
 

On 2012-05-21 06:43:42 -0700, Alan Browne
said:

On 2012-05-20 22:09 , Annika1980 wrote:
How many pics can you submit?

3 photos as usual.

You should have mine.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

1 week to go on Macro/Closeups
 

On 2012-05-21 10:45 , Savageduck wrote:
On 2012-05-21 06:43:42 -0700, Alan Browne
said:

On 2012-05-20 22:09 , Annika1980 wrote:
How many pics can you submit?

3 photos as usual.

You should have mine.

Could be - I don't normally look until the weekend of.

Just spent a few hours in the woods - not much to show for it.


--
"Civilization is the limitless multiplication of unnecessary necessities."
-Samuel Clemens.