PhotoBanter.com

PhotoBanter.com (http://www.photobanter.com/index.php)
-   In The Darkroom (http://www.photobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Question: how dark is dark enough? (http://www.photobanter.com/showthread.php?t=110475)

David Nebenzahl January 12th 10 06:14 AM

Question: how dark is dark enough?
 
I'm about to revive my darkroom, which has been sitting gathering dust
now for a couple years. (That dust is gonna be a big problem, I know.)
So I'm wondering if the place I have in mind for it is dark enough.

It's the bottom half of my live/work space which has no windows, at the
opposite end of the room which opens into the upstairs. I sat down there
for a while tonight to see how dark it was; after a few minutes, I could
just barely make out faint lightness at the other end of the room, but
could see nothing definite.

So I'm wondering if there's a rule of thumb about how dark is dark
enough. You know, something like the "sunny 16" rule about what can be
seen with the naked eye.

Yeah, yeah, I know I could make some test exposures with paper, but you
know what? I just don't want to. I'm not planning on making any
gallery-quality prints, just want to print the last couple of rolls of
film that I shot. So if you have any rough guidelines, I'm all ears.

My impression is that it's plenty dark enough, so long as I work fairly
efficiently and don't leave paper exposed to ambient light for too long.


--
You were wrong, and I'm man enough to admit it.

- a Usenet "apology"

Alvaro[_2_] January 12th 10 10:15 AM

Question: how dark is dark enough?
 
I agree with Javier, since your paper does not face to the white light
source, it could be suitable to ensure your paper is not going to be
exposed even when that white light is mixed with the safety darkroom
safety red/orange light. It's quite difficult to get a whole room in
dark because of windows and doors, this is not essential for paper as it
is for negative film.

Alvaro

JDA escribió:
David Nebenzahl wrote:
I'm about to revive my darkroom, which has been sitting gathering dust
now for a couple years. (That dust is gonna be a big problem, I know.)
So I'm wondering if the place I have in mind for it is dark enough.

It's the bottom half of my live/work space which has no windows, at
the opposite end of the room which opens into the upstairs. I sat down
there for a while tonight to see how dark it was; after a few minutes,
I could just barely make out faint lightness at the other end of the
room, but could see nothing definite.

So I'm wondering if there's a rule of thumb about how dark is dark
enough. You know, something like the "sunny 16" rule about what can be
seen with the naked eye.

Yeah, yeah, I know I could make some test exposures with paper, but
you know what? I just don't want to. I'm not planning on making any
gallery-quality prints, just want to print the last couple of rolls of
film that I shot. So if you have any rough guidelines, I'm all ears.

My impression is that it's plenty dark enough, so long as I work
fairly efficiently and don't leave paper exposed to ambient light for
too long.


I think it will be perfectly fine. In my (no so) darkroom I can see lots
of light under the door, and as far as the paper does not "see" it (I
don't know how express it, I just keep the sensible face of the paper
upwards: the light comes in from the floor) I never have had a problem.
Yes, I have made test exposures, no fogging.

Javier


Jean-David Beyer January 12th 10 03:31 PM

Question: how dark is dark enough?
 
David Nebenzahl wrote:
I'm about to revive my darkroom, which has been sitting gathering dust
now for a couple years. (That dust is gonna be a big problem, I know.)
So I'm wondering if the place I have in mind for it is dark enough.

It's the bottom half of my live/work space which has no windows, at the
opposite end of the room which opens into the upstairs. I sat down there
for a while tonight to see how dark it was; after a few minutes, I could
just barely make out faint lightness at the other end of the room, but
could see nothing definite.

So I'm wondering if there's a rule of thumb about how dark is dark
enough. You know, something like the "sunny 16" rule about what can be
seen with the naked eye.

Yeah, yeah, I know I could make some test exposures with paper, but you
know what? I just don't want to. I'm not planning on making any
gallery-quality prints, just want to print the last couple of rolls of
film that I shot. So if you have any rough guidelines, I'm all ears.

My impression is that it's plenty dark enough, so long as I work fairly
efficiently and don't leave paper exposed to ambient light for too long.


In my experience if it is a lot darker than the safelights, I am OK. If
what you mean and what I mean by "a lot darker" is about the same.

My darkroom leaks somewhat under the door. But my darkroom is L shaped
and the door is at the far end, away from the enlarger and sink. I
cannot see the leak until I have accommodated for 5 minutes or so. I
have tested exposures of paper (not the "quarter test" but the one Kodak
specify), and I get no fogging of paper even with the safelights on.

I have done less exacting tests with film. Basically, I do not get
fogging of 400 speed or slower films. I never use faster film than that,
so I do not know what happens with those.

I was once in the darkroom of an astronomical observatory. That was
DARK! It had no windows, an "air lock" type door setup. You could not
see anything, and 20 minutes later you could still not see anything. You
could leave film "exposed" in there I imagine.

Even the loading area for Kodachrome at their Fair Lawn plant had a dim
green safelight. It was not usually on, but they turned it on for
trainees. You could not see anything except the light, so you knew which
way you were facing, but that was about all.

You surely do not need anything like these last two examples.

--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org
^^-^^ 10:20:01 up 4 days, 12:15, 3 users, load average: 4.40, 4.44, 4.54

JDA January 12th 10 08:06 PM

Question: how dark is dark enough?
 
David Nebenzahl wrote:
I'm about to revive my darkroom, which has been sitting gathering dust
now for a couple years. (That dust is gonna be a big problem, I know.)
So I'm wondering if the place I have in mind for it is dark enough.

It's the bottom half of my live/work space which has no windows, at the
opposite end of the room which opens into the upstairs. I sat down there
for a while tonight to see how dark it was; after a few minutes, I could
just barely make out faint lightness at the other end of the room, but
could see nothing definite.

So I'm wondering if there's a rule of thumb about how dark is dark
enough. You know, something like the "sunny 16" rule about what can be
seen with the naked eye.

Yeah, yeah, I know I could make some test exposures with paper, but you
know what? I just don't want to. I'm not planning on making any
gallery-quality prints, just want to print the last couple of rolls of
film that I shot. So if you have any rough guidelines, I'm all ears.

My impression is that it's plenty dark enough, so long as I work fairly
efficiently and don't leave paper exposed to ambient light for too long.


I think it will be perfectly fine. In my (no so) darkroom I can see lots
of light under the door, and as far as the paper does not "see" it (I
don't know how express it, I just keep the sensible face of the paper
upwards: the light comes in from the floor) I never have had a problem.
Yes, I have made test exposures, no fogging.

Javier

Richard Knoppow January 15th 10 09:15 PM

Question: how dark is dark enough?
 

"David Nebenzahl" wrote in message
s.com...
I'm about to revive my darkroom, which has been sitting
gathering dust now for a couple years. (That dust is gonna
be a big problem, I know.) So I'm wondering if the place I
have in mind for it is dark enough.

It's the bottom half of my live/work space which has no
windows, at the opposite end of the room which opens into
the upstairs. I sat down there for a while tonight to see
how dark it was; after a few minutes, I could just barely
make out faint lightness at the other end of the room, but
could see nothing definite.

So I'm wondering if there's a rule of thumb about how dark
is dark enough. You know, something like the "sunny 16"
rule about what can be seen with the naked eye.

Yeah, yeah, I know I could make some test exposures with
paper, but you know what? I just don't want to. I'm not
planning on making any gallery-quality prints, just want
to print the last couple of rolls of film that I shot. So
if you have any rough guidelines, I'm all ears.

My impression is that it's plenty dark enough, so long as
I work fairly efficiently and don't leave paper exposed to
ambient light for too long.

Its an impossible question to answer without testing.
As a rule of thumb if you can see _any_ light once your eyes
become dark-adapted, its too much. It takes a minimum of
half an hour of darkness for eyes to reach maximum
senstivity. Often a room which appears to be completely dark
at first will prove to be surprizingly bright once your eyes
get used to it.
Since the sensitivity of film or paper is boosted by
exposure to low-level light even small amounts can cause
slight fogging.

--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA




David Nebenzahl January 17th 10 09:26 PM

Question: how dark is dark enough?
 
On 1/12/2010 7:31 AM Jean-David Beyer spake thus:

My darkroom leaks somewhat under the door. But my darkroom is L shaped
and the door is at the far end, away from the enlarger and sink. I
cannot see the leak until I have accommodated for 5 minutes or so. I
have tested exposures of paper (not the "quarter test" but the one Kodak
specify), and I get no fogging of paper even with the safelights on.


So what exactly is the test that Kodak specifies? Googling finds no info
on this (but a lot of results about "quarter test"). And why is it
better than the quarter test?

I suppose I'll do a test when I finally fire up the darkroom again.


--
You were wrong, and I'm man enough to admit it.

- a Usenet "apology"

Jean-David Beyer January 17th 10 11:59 PM

Question: how dark is dark enough?
 
David Nebenzahl wrote:
On 1/12/2010 7:31 AM Jean-David Beyer spake thus:

My darkroom leaks somewhat under the door. But my darkroom is L shaped
and the door is at the far end, away from the enlarger and sink. I
cannot see the leak until I have accommodated for 5 minutes or so. I
have tested exposures of paper (not the "quarter test" but the one Kodak
specify), and I get no fogging of paper even with the safelights on.


So what exactly is the test that Kodak specifies? Googling finds no info
on this (but a lot of results about "quarter test"). And why is it
better than the quarter test?

I suppose I'll do a test when I finally fire up the darkroom again.


http://www.kodak.com/global/en/consu...Contents.shtml

--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org
^^-^^ 18:55:01 up 9 days, 20:50, 5 users, load average: 4.64, 4.72, 4.81


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PhotoBanter.com