|
|
Hey RichA! Don't you think that this is a scam too?
The Nikkor 200-500 that is. Same price as the splash sealed Sigma Sport
and have a look at what they give you! http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...e-Crops.aspx?L ens=1035&Camera=614&Sample=0&FLI=3&API=0&LensComp= 978&CameraComp=453&Samp leComp=0&FLIComp=6&APIComp=0 It's a Nikkor!!! Yeah right... -- teleportation kills |
Hey RichA! Don't you think that this is a scam too?
On 8/17/2016 8:30 AM, RichA wrote:
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...e-Crops.aspx?L ens=1035&Camera=614&Sample=0&FLI=3&API=0&LensComp =978&CameraComp=453&Samp leComp=0&FLIComp=6&APIComp=0 That copy of the Nikkor is soft and suffers from a lot of CA. |
Hey RichA! Don't you think that this is a scam too?
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:05:24 -0400, PAS wrote in
: On 8/17/2016 8:30 AM, RichA wrote: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...le-Crops.aspx? L ens=1035&Camera=614&Sample=0&FLI=3&API=0&LensComp =978&CameraComp=453&Samp leComp=0&FLIComp=6&APIComp=0 That copy of the Nikkor is soft and suffers from a lot of CA. It went through Nikon QC and Nikon should stand by that that they ship! -- teleportation kills |
Hey RichA! Don't you think that this is a scam too?
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 05:30:05 -0700, RichA wrote in
: On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 01:30:34 UTC-4, android wrote: The Nikkor 200-500 that is. Same price as the splash sealed Sigma Sport and have a look at what they give you! http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...-12233-Sample- Crops.aspx?L ens=1035&Camera=614&Sample=0&FLI=3&API=0&LensComp= 978&CameraComp=453&Samp leComp=0&FLIComp=6&APIComp=0 It's a Nikkor!!! Yeah right... -- teleportation kills I think the Canon 1DsMKIII is doing in-body colour correction compared to the old Nikon D3X. If you switch to the D810, it does more or less the same thing. In this comparison, the Sigma looks better though. But then that particular Sigma is also $600 more than the Nikon, so I'd expect better images. The camera can handle the expected resolution, other samples shows that. The problem is obviously the lens. http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...le-Crops.aspx? Lens=1035&Camera=614&Sample=0&FLI=2&API=0&LensComp =704&CameraComp=614&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=4&APIComp =0 Edit: http://tinyurl.com/hsyeado -- teleportation kills |
Hey RichA! Don't you think that this is a scam too?
On 8/17/2016 1:30 AM, android wrote:
The Nikkor 200-500 that is. Same price as the splash sealed Sigma Sport and have a look at what they give you! http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...e-Crops.aspx?L ens=1035&Camera=614&Sample=0&FLI=3&API=0&LensComp= 978&CameraComp=453&Samp leComp=0&FLIComp=6&APIComp=0 It's a Nikkor!!! Yeah right... I did my own testing with that lens. My go, no go results: Sharp , contrasty, with faster focus tracking on my D500 than either the Sigma, the expensive one, or the Tamron. Practical limitation for me. I gave it the ultimate test, which it failed. The lens was too heavy for me to carry for more than about an hour. -- PeterN |
Hey RichA! Don't you think that this is a scam too?
On 8/17/2016 9:05 AM, PAS wrote:
On 8/17/2016 8:30 AM, RichA wrote: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...e-Crops.aspx?L ens=1035&Camera=614&Sample=0&FLI=3&API=0&LensComp =978&CameraComp=453&Samp leComp=0&FLIComp=6&APIComp=0 That copy of the Nikkor is soft and suffers from a lot of CA. See my above posting. If no for the weight, I would now own it. -- PeterN |
Hey RichA! Don't you think that this is a scam too?
On 8/17/2016 11:10 AM, PeterN wrote:
On 8/17/2016 1:30 AM, android wrote: The Nikkor 200-500 that is. Same price as the splash sealed Sigma Sport and have a look at what they give you! http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...e-Crops.aspx?L ens=1035&Camera=614&Sample=0&FLI=3&API=0&LensComp= 978&CameraComp=453&Samp leComp=0&FLIComp=6&APIComp=0 It's a Nikkor!!! Yeah right... I did my own testing with that lens. My go, no go results: Sharp , contrasty, with faster focus tracking on my D500 than either the Sigma, the expensive one, or the Tamron. Practical limitation for me. I gave it the ultimate test, which it failed. The lens was too heavy for me to carry for more than about an hour. I get tired just carrying myself around for an hour. |
Hey RichA! Don't you think that this is a scam too?
On 8/17/2016 11:29 AM, PAS wrote:
On 8/17/2016 11:10 AM, PeterN wrote: On 8/17/2016 1:30 AM, android wrote: The Nikkor 200-500 that is. Same price as the splash sealed Sigma Sport and have a look at what they give you! http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...e-Crops.aspx?L ens=1035&Camera=614&Sample=0&FLI=3&API=0&LensComp= 978&CameraComp=453&Samp leComp=0&FLIComp=6&APIComp=0 It's a Nikkor!!! Yeah right... I did my own testing with that lens. My go, no go results: Sharp , contrasty, with faster focus tracking on my D500 than either the Sigma, the expensive one, or the Tamron. Practical limitation for me. I gave it the ultimate test, which it failed. The lens was too heavy for me to carry for more than about an hour. I get tired just carrying myself around for an hour. Went to Nickerson last week, without my chair and caret. It too me longer to get back to my car, than I spent shooting. ;-( It was a big mistake not taking a chair. BTW your comment about C/A: While I didn't test for that, here's what Thom Hogan has to say: http://www.dslrbodies.com/lenses/nikon-lens-reviews/nikon-200-500mm-f56-lens.html -- PeterN |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
PhotoBanter.com